>I have a Polo 1.4 (1998) that has gradually become noisy at the top end.
> Sounds like a single noisy tappet, apparent on startup, then goes away for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Is anybody familiar with this problem?
> Could be a tapped. You could try thicker oil.
> If this doesn't help then check the tapped(s), they should have no
> more then 0,2mm clearance when pressed in.
Thanks for your reply. I forgot to mention that the engine has done
96,000 miles, so it's not particularly 'old'.
I have already changed the oil from 10/40 to 15/40 and the noise persists.
I'm used to the old "rocker box" type of tappets, where you can easily get
access, loosen the locking nut, turn the screw a quarter turn, and tighten
the locking nut. I have no idea how hydraulic tappets work, how difficult it
is to get at them, and how difficult it is to adjust them.
Any further advice at all would be most welcome.
Dave - 28 Mar 2009 17:28 GMT
> I have already changed the oil from 10/40 to 15/40 and the noise persists.
That oil change will make no difference to a warm engine. You'd need to go
to a 50 for any difference once the engine's hot.
> I'm used to the old "rocker box" type of tappets, where you can easily get
> access, loosen the locking nut, turn the screw a quarter turn, and tighten
> the locking nut. I have no idea how hydraulic tappets work, how difficult
> it
> is to get at them, and how difficult it is to adjust them.
You can't adjust a hydraulic tappet as they're self adjusting. The can fail
though so it might be worth getting them all done. Shouldn't be too
expensive especially on yours assuming it's an 8 valve engine.
David
andy-k - 28 Mar 2009 18:21 GMT
> You can't adjust a hydraulic tappet as they're self adjusting. The
> can fail though so it might be worth getting them all done. Shouldn't
> be too expensive especially on yours assuming it's an 8 valve engine.
Thanks Dave. I'll look into getting the tappets changed.
SFC - 28 Mar 2009 18:32 GMT
>> Could be a tapped. You could try thicker oil.
>> If this doesn't help then check the tapped(s), they should have no
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Any further advice at all would be most welcome.
You have to remove the cam to get at them. This also involves removing the
cambelt from the sprocket etc. Not something you do in a half an hour like
in the old days.....
SFC
andy-k - 28 Mar 2009 18:58 GMT
> Not something you do in a half an hour like in the old days.....
lol! And they call it 'progress' :-)
SFC - 29 Mar 2009 11:02 GMT
Well the progress is of course that you never have to adjust the valve play
which saves on maintenance.
SFC
>> Not something you do in a half an hour like in the old days.....
>
> lol! And they call it 'progress' :-)
andy-k - 29 Mar 2009 14:13 GMT
> Well the progress is of course that you never have to adjust the valve
> play which saves on maintenance.
Sure -- it was just my little joke.
Incidentally, I changed the oil a couple of days ago and added a can of
Wynn's "hydraulic valve lifter concentrate". It might be wishful thinking at
this early stage, but I feel sure that the engine is quieter today.
Chris Bartram - 29 Mar 2009 20:54 GMT
> You have to remove the cam to get at them. This also involves removing the
> cambelt from the sprocket etc. Not something you do in a half an hour like
> in the old days.....
>
> SFC
It's not much work over a cambelt change though: I did my MK2 Golf,
including the belt, in a few hours.
SFC - 30 Mar 2009 17:08 GMT
> It's not much work over a cambelt change though: I did my MK2 Golf,
> including the belt, in a few hours.
I agree, the golf mk2 has a very simple engine with good acces to all the
pulleys etc.
Maybe it's a good idea to also replace the belt at the same time.
SFC
Chris Bartram - 31 Mar 2009 14:23 GMT
> I agree, the golf mk2 has a very simple engine with good acces to all the
> pulleys etc.
> Maybe it's a good idea to also replace the belt at the same time.
>
> SFC
Access might be harder with a modern Polo of course, but It would still
be a good idea to replace the belt, as you say.