> I was thinking about removing the flame trap from my '92 240. Anyone
> is running its Volvo (any models) without the flame trap?
>
> Feedback appreciated.
>> I was thinking about removing the flame trap from my '92 240. Anyone
>> is running its Volvo (any models) without the flame trap?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>the crankcase [think *BOOM*]. Older Rovers have a reputation for this
>form of engine self destruction (since they did not have a flame trap)
Didn't they call it the "Automatic Rear Seal Replacement Feature"?
;-)
from Randy & Valerie
__ __
\ \ / /
\ \/ /
\__/olvo
1993 960
Stuart Gray - 15 May 2004 19:33 GMT
> >> I was thinking about removing the flame trap from my '92 240. Anyone
> >> is running its Volvo (any models) without the flame trap?
Every 240/740 non turbo I've owned has one, except for my present 740 2.0
auto. Apparently Volvo now don't insist on them. The "new" car has the
extended tube to make flame trap replacement easier and the fittings are the
same, but no flame trap "pepperpot" is included.