> Dopn't think anywhere elese but north America would really want a big gas
> guzzling V8.
> Notice that the V8 is available only in left hand drive version so only
> Europe and America can have it, but not UK, Australia and most of Asia.
> So the 5 and 6 cylinders gotta stay.
Where else but north america would the xc-90 sell? What country located
between Canada and Mexico, the atlantic and the pacific oceans provides most
of the operational profit that Volvo cars earns, a lot due to the people who
gotta have a SUV?
I dislike SUV's but if you look at a XC-90 you have a tasteful, safe, and
well thought out SUV, the best of a bad bunch, save, perhaps the BMW, VW,
and Porsche--but my sporting side shows!
A XC-90 is not all that quick with the turbo 6, fill one up with people and
the V* will provide a nice boast in power over the turbo 6.
As far as MPG's (KPL's) the V8 often does better then a 6 and especially a
turbo 6 because the V8 is just loafing along while the 6 is using most of
it's power, and the turbos, if so equipped, are called upon often for fuel
robbing boast.
Real world the V8 will not be as big a difference as you might think, but if
you think why not rethink and buy a s-80?
> > Just read on
> > http://www.swedespeed.com/news/publish/Volvo_News/article_329.html
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> > soon - also it's a 60 degree Vee which means it's at the better angle to
> > make a V6 out of - think Volvo is going to abandon the inline engines?