V50 AWD

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Dana Rohleder - 23 Oct 2004 00:44 GMT

I test drove a V50 AWD today and WOW! A touch small for my needs (cargo
area) but what a ride! I thought it drove better than a Jag X-type (AWD) I
also tested this weekend. Not as cushy over bumps, but better acceleration
and handling.

Signature

Dana
--
"Secondly, the tactics of our-as you know, we don't have relationships with
Iran. I mean, that's-ever since the late '70s, we have no contacts with
them, and we've totally sanctioned them. In other words, there's no
sanctions-you can't-we're out of sanctions."

G.W. Bush - Annandale, Va., Aug. 9, 2004

Reply to this Message

Andrew Potter - 24 Oct 2004 07:56 GMT

I have tested a FWD version (I think the AWD version is available for
the first time in UK about now). I found it ok but I thought the V70 feels
like a better chassis & the extra room is invaluable if you use these
vehicles as intended. I thought also compared to V70 the brakes were
particularly 'wooden'. Overall there was too much 'Focus C-max' feel to the
chassis, which is what it is based on. Have you tried the V70?

>I test drove a V50 AWD today and WOW! A touch small for my needs (cargo
>area) but what a ride! I thought it drove better than a Jag X-type (AWD) I
>also tested this weekend. Not as cushy over bumps, but better acceleration
>and handling.

Reply to this Message

Dana Rohleder - 24 Oct 2004 14:39 GMT

Yes, and I absolutely agree - the V70 is much more car - and much more $$.
Comparably equipped, the XC70 runs about $15k more. It's worth it if you can
afford it, but if you can't, the V50 AWD seems to be a good value. I am
probably going to buy a used XC70 for the same amount as the V50.

Signature

Dana C. Rohleder
Port Kent, NY

> I have tested a FWD version (I think the AWD version is available for
> the first time in UK about now). I found it ok but I thought the V70
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>also tested this weekend. Not as cushy over bumps, but better acceleration
>>and handling.

Reply to this Message

Tim Hobbs - 24 Oct 2004 15:12 GMT

>Yes, and I absolutely agree - the V70 is much more car - and much more $$.
>Comparably equipped, the XC70 runs about $15k more. It's worth it if you can
>afford it, but if you can't, the V50 AWD seems to be a good value. I am
>probably going to buy a used XC70 for the same amount as the V50.

In the UK V70's depreciate quite heavily. I chose between a new V50
and an 11 month old V70. The V70 was cheaper and much more car for
the money. The list price of the V70 new would have been £28K - I
paid £19K for an 11000 mile car.

Isn't the V50 AWD built more for speed than bad weather driving? The
XC70 has raised suspension and without the right tyres a 4x4 car won't
do much better in snow than a 2WD.

Signature

Tim Hobbs

'58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
'77 101FC Ambulance aka "Burrt"
'03 Volvo V70

My Landies? http://www.seriesii.co.uk
Barcoding? http://www.bartec-systems.com
Tony Luckwill web archive at http://www.luckwill.com

Reply to this Message

Dana Rohleder - 24 Oct 2004 15:50 GMT

Yes, the V50 AWD is a performance wagon - possibly overpowered for winter
driving. Torque and HP are no advantage on ice!!

Signature

Dana C. Rohleder
Port Kent, NY

>
>>Yes, and I absolutely agree - the V70 is much more car - and much more $$.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> XC70 has raised suspension and without the right tyres a 4x4 car won't
> do much better in snow than a 2WD.

Reply to this Message