Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Volvo Cars / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Studding tires

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gerry - 11 Dec 2004 23:50 GMT
Can anyone tell me if you can insert the studs into a studdable tire (with
or without a tool?

I'me thinking particularly of  Nokian, probably Hakkapeliitta 2 or Nordman
1.

If a tool is required, is there a tool that can be purchased at the consumer
level?

Thanks

Gerry
Franz Bestuchev - 13 Dec 2004 04:43 GMT
> Can anyone tell me if you can insert the studs into a studdable tire (with
> or without a tool?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gerry

I've only ever heard of tires being studded at the tire shop, they also
won't do it to used tires for safety reasons or some such.
Timo Kiravuo - 13 Dec 2004 15:12 GMT
> I've only ever heard of tires being studded at the tire shop, they also
> won't do it to used tires for safety reasons or some such.

DIY stud kits exist for boots, I don't know about tires, the forces are
a little bit different in size.

You should only stud new tires. Sand and dirt collects into the holes
and the studs don't stay very well in old tires.

kiravuo
blurp - 14 Dec 2004 16:54 GMT
I wanted to stud my tires but I only have mares on my tire farm.

<drum break>
blurp

>> I've only ever heard of tires being studded at the tire shop, they also
>> won't do it to used tires for safety reasons or some such.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>kiravuo
Michael Pardee - 14 Dec 2004 18:00 GMT
>I wanted to stud my tires but I only have mares on my tire farm.
>
> <drum break>
> blurp

Ow! My brain hurts from trying to picture that.

Mike

>>> I've only ever heard of tires being studded at the tire shop, they also
>>> won't do it to used tires for safety reasons or some such.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
>>kiravuo
Stephen Henning - 14 Dec 2004 17:19 GMT
> Can anyone tell me if you can insert the studs into a studdable tire (with
> or without a tool?

Yes, on new tires.  The tool came with the studs I bought.  I think I
got everything from J.C. Whitney.  The tool was a very simple tube
shaped gadget.  I remember loosing 90% of the skin on the heel of my
right  hand.  It is best to take your time and wear gloves.  Not a
trivial task.  It is strictly a brute force physical task.  Studs are
illegal in PA and many other states.  They tear up the road but work
great on ice.  Are no help at all on snow.

Signature

Pardon my spam deterrent; send email to rhodyman@earthlink.net
Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA USA
http://home.earthlink.net/~rhodyman

~^ beancounter ~^ - 17 Dec 2004 20:53 GMT
does studding make a big difference? does it only work on a nice,
snowpac
road...or solid ice? will a volvo act "squirely" once you hit pavement
& get
up to speed (60-80mph)?......just wonderin' i have never used studded
tyres
on a car...richard / colorado
Stephen Henning - 18 Dec 2004 02:51 GMT
> does studding make a big difference? does it only work on a snowpac
> road...or solid ice? will a volvo act "squirely" on pavement & get
> up to speed (60-80mph)?......just wonderin' i have never used studded
> tyres on a car...richard / colorado

Basically, the studs only help on glare ice.  On dry pavement, the studs
don't degrade performance, but are very noisy.  They tear up the
pavement very quickly.  That is the reason they are banned in many
states.  On snow pack and packed snow, dedicated snow tires work the
best.  Studs don't help very much.
Signature

Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
   Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '02 Volvos.
   The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '02 through European Delivery.
 http://home.earthlink.net/~rhodyman/volvo.html

~^ beancounter ~^ - 18 Dec 2004 04:01 GMT
steve...out of all your volvos...what one
did you enjoy best (all around) and why?

"Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '02 Volvos.
The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '02 through European Delivery."
Stephen Henning - 18 Dec 2004 17:32 GMT
> steve...out of all your volvos...what one
> did you enjoy best (all around) and why?
>
> "Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
> Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '02 Volvos.
> The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '02 through European Delivery."

The '71 1800E.  The handling, acceleration, braking, great stereo
system, comfortable leather seats, gas mileage, and cool exhaust sound
were impressive.  After 10 years, I sold the 1800E in '81 for exactly
what I paid for it.  The depreciation was zero.  I sold it because it
required leaded gas which was hard to get and because it was worth so
much.  The couple that bought it already had one and wanted another.

The 1800E had two draw backs: 1) since it had a quick steering ratio and
didn't have power steering, it parallel parked like a truck and 2) the
high beam indicator light was hidden behind the steering wheel.  I
installed a new high beam indicator lamp off to one side.  Before I put
in the new light, I was constantly coming over a hill or around a curve
to an oncoming car and wasn't sure if my brights were on.

My second favorite was the '93 850.  It was a quantum jump forward for
Volvo.  The handling, acceleration, braking, winter handling, fuel
economy, and the great high-beams were a welcome improvement.  I sold it
in '01 because it had 180,000 miles on it and was still worth 30%  of
what I paid for it.  The '01 XC70 is even better, but not as big an
improvement.  I do love being able to speed away from stops in wet
weather with no wheel spin.

My third favorite was probably the first one, a '67 122 wagon.  It was
great to be able to buy a car in 1967 with good disc brakes that
wouldn't fade in wet weather, a legendary safety record, peerless
reliability, comfortable 3-point seat belts, superb handling and good
gas mileage.  I was coming off a '58 Mercury that was like driving a
boat and its brakes were useless if they got wet.  It had something fail
on every major trip we went on and couldn't pass a gas station.
Signature

Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
   Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '02 Volvos.
   The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '02 through European Delivery.
 http://home.earthlink.net/~rhodyman/volvo.html

~^ beancounter ~^ - 18 Dec 2004 21:59 GMT
nice Steve...thanx for the tips and insight...i am
thinkin' bout my next volvo....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.