Car Forum / Volvo Cars / January 2005
purchase new v50 or not?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
humblejohn@anonymous.to - 30 Jan 2005 02:36 GMT my wife wants to buy the v50. we have never owned a volvo. i am really worried because it is owned by the slimebags at Ford. Is this a car that the owner can service (brakes, oil changes, trans. fluid etc) or must it be brought to a dealer? I hope it is not a ford dealer. if anyone has experience with these cars please let me know. I have already seen some negative comments about servicing costs and dealers on this newsgroup. i think that the volvo shares the frame or body with mazda. in addition, is there enough serious saftey advantages on the volvo to make it worthwhile to overpay for it? i have looked at brochures and on the net but i can't find exactly what the supposed saftey features are. I mean features which are not on other cars but are worthwhile. thanks in advance.
hmm - 30 Jan 2005 03:26 GMT > my wife wants to buy the v50. we have never owned a volvo. i am really > worried [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > exactly what the supposed saftey features are. I mean features which > are not on other cars but are worthwhile. thanks in advance. I'd say no, save money and buy the Mazda version if you must have the car. IMO, Volvo died when the 900 series was put to rest. Damn you Ford, damn you!
Stewart Hargrave - 30 Jan 2005 04:13 GMT >IMO, Volvo died when the 900 series was put to rest. Damn you Ford, damn >you! Ford had nothing to do with Volvo when the 900 ceased production in the mid 90s. It wasn't until 1999 that the Ford buy-out occured. Meantime, there was the 850, 40, 70 and 90 series, all in production before Ford took over.
They bought Jaguar 10 years earlier, and seemed to have revived their lacklustre production rather well.
Personally, I think it is still too early to be able to say whether Ford have adversly affected Volvo. By about 15 years.
 Signature
Stewart Hargrave
For email, replace 'SpamOnlyToHere' with my name
hmm - 30 Jan 2005 04:08 GMT >>IMO, Volvo died when the 900 series was put to rest. Damn you Ford, damn >>you! [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Personally, I think it is still too early to be able to say whether > Ford have adversly affected Volvo. By about 15 years. I never cared for the FWD Volvos. As for Jags, well, they are really nice Fords...
Rob Guenther - 30 Jan 2005 20:37 GMT The Mazda is a nice car, and is definately the best value in the economy class... But the V50 is in a class above it, has more cargo room (V50 is a real wagon, the Mazda3 Sport is a cross between hatcback and small wagon), upgraded safety cage to Volvo's standards, bigger engine as standard than optional on the Mazda3 (and the Volvos engines are... Volvos own engines), you can also get optional AWD on the Volvo (a benefit in countries with winter) you can't on the Mazda. The Volvo also has an interior that has been designed with a more conservative clientel in mind, the Mazda's is more youthfull and sporty (Though as a 21 year old I prefer the Volvo's interior by quite a large margin. I don't really like a flashy car or interior, so the S40 appeals to me greatly. Understated timeless class and elegance is more appealing to me than this-minute styling and a flashy interior that will only impress for 5 minutes).
Other niceties are the Dolby II stereo system (optional) - why not include a similar system on the Mazda as an option? Younger people seem to like big rich sound, at the Mazda dealer I was shocked to learn it only had a 6 speaker stereo system driven from the headunit as the highest level audio system in the car... Ie only on the GT model, I don't think you could option out the better system on the more affordable models.
When I compared the S40 (V50 is the same, but I was looking at S40's at the dealer as they interest me more) to the V70 sitting next to it I noticed they were built in the same manner, structure looked as good as the V70, panel gaps were tight and even - It looked like a Volvo.
I can't wait to test drive one... I was impressed with the Mazda3 when I drove it in the summer... when the weather is warmer I will drive the S40.... As I have gone over the car as far as I can without driving it, so I am missing that one big point in determining if it is a good car.
>> my wife wants to buy the v50. we have never owned a volvo. i am really >> worried [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > IMO, Volvo died when the 900 series was put to rest. Damn you Ford, damn > you! Stephen Henning - 30 Jan 2005 06:11 GMT > if anyone has experience with these cars > please let me know. I have already seen some negative comments about [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > exactly what the supposed saftey features are. I mean features which > are not on other cars but are worthwhile. thanks in advance. The V50 was selected the car with the lowest cost of ownership in its class.
Netscape and Edmunds published a list of the most economical cars to own in a number of different classes. ?Their assumptions were that the car would be driven 75,000 miles in 5 years and then sold. ?It would be bought at the best dealer new price and sold at the Edmunds private party used sale price. ?Insurance, dealer maintenance costs and fuel costs are included. ?So the following are the true costs of vehicle ownership.
The report is at: http://netscape.edmunds.com/reviews/tco/2004/index.html
Wagons Wagon Under $15,000: Scion xB $0.35 per mile Wagon Under $25,000: Toyota Matrix $0.34 per mile Wagon Under $35,000: Volvo V40/V50 $0.48 per mile Wagon Under $45,000: Volvo XC70 $0.57 per mile Wagon Over $45,000: Audi S4 $0.78 per mile
The V40/V50 are also leaders in safety in their class.
 Signature Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '02 Volvos. The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '02 through European Delivery. http://home.earthlink.net/~rhodyman/volvo.html
|
|
|