Car Forum / Volvo Cars / June 2005
My 89 740 GL saga: J Sweet
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Geronimo - 18 Jun 2005 01:08 GMT Well, this is a continuation of the post from yesterday, it wasn't a fuse problem or loss of power to ECU at all. It has the B230 (or 2330?) 4-cylinder FI engine, BTW. To describe a little better what the car is doing, it seems to be getting around 2 miles to the gallon. Even before the acelleration problem developed, it had started to eat gas. it will run fine when in park or neutral,has normal acceleration. When you drive the car, it will take off with normal pwer from a stop, but right after it shifts into third, the engine just shuts itself down to idle speed, even though you continue pressing the gas pedal. You kind of get thrown forward in teh seat! To get going again, you have to let off the gas completely, then you have control of the engine speed again. I was told it was a bad AMM sensor. However, it doesn't look like that is the problem. HOwever, like I said, the check engine light is NOT on...and when I read the codes for both 2 and 6 (its the Bosch LH2.4 system) I got 1-1-1 on both. No codes are being set, even though it has this severe drivability problem. To test if the ECU was picking up faults from the AMM sensor, I disconnected it. Sure enough I then got a 1-2-1 code. SO the ECU is telling me that the sensors are good. I noticed that the big flex duct between the air intake and the AMM has gotten almost kinked off....I thought Aha! Its getting starved for air! but when I shortened up the duct and repositioned it so it is not kinked anymore, I still have same problem. I checked the air filter, it looks fine. So what could it be.... fuel pressure? fuel pump? The oil and tranny fluid are fine.
James Sweet - 18 Jun 2005 02:24 GMT > Well, this is a continuation of the post from yesterday, it wasn't > a fuse problem or loss of power to ECU at all. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > So what could it be.... fuel pressure? fuel pump? The oil and > tranny fluid are fine. Unplug the AMM and see if it runs any better.
Geronimo - 18 Jun 2005 10:55 GMT No.....it runs MUCH worse. With AMM connected, it will idle perfect, and does not run rough/erratic. Disconnected, it will not idle at all, and at lower RPMs it runs rough. Looking through the grate, the filament is intact. Thanks, Jim
>> Well, this is a continuation of the post from yesterday, it wasn't >> a fuse problem or loss of power to ECU at all. [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > >Unplug the AMM and see if it runs any better. Michael Pardee - 18 Jun 2005 17:47 GMT > No.....it runs MUCH worse. With AMM connected, it will idle perfect, > and does not run rough/erratic. Disconnected, it will not idle at > all, and at lower RPMs it runs rough. Looking through the grate, the > filament is intact. Thanks, Jim That makes me really wonder about the fuel pressure. The O2 sensor can't put the mixture off that much, and the limp-home setting isn't right either. There isn't much left besides fuel pressure being too high. Time to get serious about measuring that.
I assume *all* the plugs are sooted up?
Mike
Russ - 18 Jun 2005 02:42 GMT I had an 89 740 that exhibited similar behavior and it was the wiring harness. The wiring was shorting out right at the connector by the passenger side headlight. I forget what it is called but there is a big square connector over by the passenger headlight. I know that electrical problems usually cause the car to buck and fuel problems casue the car to die slowly. Mine was electrical that was shutting off the gas flow and starving the engine of fuel.
Regards Russ
Michael Pardee - 18 Jun 2005 03:09 GMT > Well, this is a continuation of the post from yesterday, it wasn't > a fuse problem or loss of power to ECU at all. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > So what could it be.... fuel pressure? fuel pump? The oil and > tranny fluid are fine. Fuel pressure regulators have been known to go bad - a quick (and not positive) test is to pull the vacuum hose off the regulator and see if there is gas inside the hose. If so, you can be sure the regulator is bad. If not, you still don't know for sure.
Mike
Geronimo - 19 Jun 2005 03:55 GMT Well, I will go get a fuel pressure gauge. It doesn't sound easy to tee into the fuel rail somewhere...and then I have to run the gauge line through the firewall somewhere so I can watch the gauge while driving. What a pain! I don't quite understand why an extremely rich mixture isn't turning the chk engine lite on, as it seems like the o2 sensor would trip an "o2 level out of range situation" for the ECU.
BTW, I am not sure my Haynes gives the normal fuel rail pressure. Do you know what it is? Is the regulator suposed to keep it the same whether driving or in park? thanks for the help.
>> Well, this is a continuation of the post from yesterday, it wasn't >> a fuse problem or loss of power to ECU at all. [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > >Mike James Sweet - 19 Jun 2005 04:54 GMT > Well, I will go get a fuel pressure gauge. It doesn't sound easy to > tee into the fuel rail somewhere...and then I have to run the gauge [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > turning the chk engine lite on, as it seems like the o2 sensor would > trip an "o2 level out of range situation" for the ECU. Is there a junkyard near you? I've always just kept a spare around to swap in if there's a problem, it's easier than trying to test the pressure.
Michael Pardee - 19 Jun 2005 05:29 GMT > Well, I will go get a fuel pressure gauge. It doesn't sound easy to > tee into the fuel rail somewhere...and then I have to run the gauge [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > whether driving or in park? > thanks for the help. I cut the fuel supply hose about 1 1/2 inches from the fuel rail fitting and inserted the tee there, then removed the short piece and connected the hose back to the fitting when I was through. With the vacuum hose removed from the fuel pressure regulator (and the hose plugged) the corect reading is 36 psi, or 42 psi for the turbo model. Reconnecting the hose should drop the reading by the amount of manifold "vacuum" - about 10 psi less fuel pressure at idle. What you are looking for is a big deviation, like double the fuel pressure.
In the '89 I don't know if the check engine light would come on with the rich mixture, but it would make sense that it would. Just a wild thought - when the battery failed in my Nissan 300ZX the mixture went way rich (so the top speed was about 40 mph and there was a black cloud following me) because the ECU was constantly being reset by the noise from the alternator; no check engine light. Oddly, the engine still cranked okay but replacing the battery fixed the problem. If you have a DVM around a check for AC voltage across the battery terminals would ward off a few evil spirits - it should be below 0.1 VAC. In addition, there should be less than 0.1 volt DC between the engine block and the chassis - more than that means the engine ground strap is bad.
Mike
Geronimo - 19 Jun 2005 14:56 GMT Autozone doesn't have a fuel pressure tester, so I am shopping for one on eBay. This one is available (at a very good price),
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=43989&item=455 7331361&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW
it has an adapter which actually is made to fit GM, but it is metric. F itting size: M16 x 1.5 I don't have a clue what the fuel rail fitting size is on my 740, so can't tell whether this one will work. Then I have the problem of extending the gauge hose, as 3 ft isn't going to get the gauge located inside the car to be read while driving. I think it is best to buy a guage rather than shotogun a new fuel press regulator, as my brother has a 740 GL also, and I am probably going to buy another one myself. I haven't had good experiences with parts from salvage yards, so I would have to pay $52 for a new regulator, posibly only to find it wasn't needed.
I gather that since fuel consumption has gone way up, then the fuel rail presure might be too high at low speed or idle, and then way too low when punching the accelerator? I checked the oil for signs of gas in it...it is okay. I pulled the vacuum line off of the fuel press. regulalor while running (immediately closing off the open end of hose), and there did seem to be a slight difference in the sound of the engine (possibly indicationg a change in fuel rail pressure/fuel delivery)....but it was very slight.
I checked the spark plugs, and they have a light coating of blackish stuff, but not jet-black soot...and there is not any smoke coming from the tailpipe. They all looked identical.
Thanks, Jim
>> Well, I will go get a fuel pressure gauge. It doesn't sound easy to >> tee into the fuel rail somewhere...and then I have to run the gauge [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > >Mike Gomer Einstein - 19 Jun 2005 18:41 GMT Since it's got a malfunction of that magnitude but no codes are being set, I'd suspect the ECU itself. I had a similar problem with no codes and it was the computer itself, hence no codes. I would, however, test the fuel pressure/fuel system.
Geronimo - 20 Jun 2005 17:53 GMT I figured it out!!! That 3 in. black plastic duct running between the AMM and dthe intake manifold was the problem. It has gotten very weak, flexible, and so even though the air filter didn't look very dirty at all, there was enough of a vacuum in the duct when you punched the accelerator that the duct was collapsing right near the intake end. And it was collapsing on the BOTTOM side so couldn't be seen readily. The duct finally "popped" inward and stayed that way after shutdown, so I spotted it. Now the problem is getting a replacement. Autozone doesn't have one, and there isn't a Volvo dealer where I am. A generic duct won't work because the AMM end is about 3 in., and the intake end is about 3.5 in. ID. So all I could do for now is wrap it with metal mending tape to help it hold a circular shape. Regards, Jim
> Since it's got a malfunction of that magnitude but no codes are being >set, I'd suspect the ECU itself. I had a similar problem with no codes >and it was the computer itself, hence no codes. > I would, however, test the fuel pressure/fuel system. James Sweet - 21 Jun 2005 03:41 GMT > I figured it out!!! That 3 in. black plastic duct running between the > AMM and dthe intake manifold was the problem. It has gotten very weak, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > is about 3.5 in. ID. So all I could do for now is wrap it with metal > mending tape to help it hold a circular shape. Regards, Jim Isn't there a junkyard nearby you could get one from? The tape should hold up for now, you might also be able to mail order one.
|
|
|