Boy, Volvo sure has gone backwards. My 850 is a joy to do an oil change
on. The fill cap is on the top of the engine, large and level. The oil
drain plug is right where you would want it. The spin on filter is
threads up and very near to the oil drain plug. One thing I really like
about the car is that it is obvious that the engineers really thought
about these making these routine service tasks easy.
Sounds like they got a whole different engineering team to do the V50!
John
> Boy, Volvo sure has gone backwards. My 850 is a joy to do an oil change
> on. The fill cap is on the top of the engine, large and level. The oil
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Sounds like they got a whole different engineering team to do the V50!
Actually, I thought the S70 (850 may be better in some ways) was a
big step down from the 240, and that a whole new crop of people
designed the fwd car.
I'll give you the engine oil change, it is very easy. The fuel
filter with the quick disconnects, and the serpentine belt are also
well designed. But in many ways the S70 threw away decades of
mechanical design evolution. For example-
The manual transaxle needs a socket with u-joint to remove the filler
plug, and a box wrench to remove the drain plug- but you can't use a
box wrench to remove the filler and you can't get a socket to fit on
the drain. Admittedly this is a rare job, but what was the designer
thinking? (Answer- he obviously never worked on a car before.)
S70 timing belt took me 4 hours (my 240 took me 1 hour, on my first
try). Yes, a front wheel drive will be inherently more difficult,
but still... At least they partly straightened out by redesigning
the tensioner in mid 1998. Either version is still inferior in
simplicity and cost to the tensioner on the old four cylinders.
I once changed a 240 lower front ball joint in less than an hour with
two wrenches and didn't even have to lift up the car. The S70
requires some special tools and the entire lower control arm is
replaced... I'm not looking forward to this job when the time comes.
The front sway bar end links are made of fragile plastic... woops.
The dual-triangular brakes that were a selling point on the 240 are
gone. The S70 quietly reverted to a very conventional front/rear
split (the cheapest possible configuration).
Combined power door lock and latch, the whole part is replaced when
part of it goes bad.
Front hubs are a "maintenance free" design- you can't regrease or
repack the wheel bearings.
That's just off the top of my head. There are a lot of surprises on
these cars for DIYers. It aggravates me and I hesitate to work on my
own car sometimes.
Tim.. - 17 Sep 2005 11:20 GMT
> > Boy, Volvo sure has gone backwards. My 850 is a joy to do an oil change
> > on. The fill cap is on the top of the engine, large and level. The oil
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> big step down from the 240, and that a whole new crop of people
> designed the fwd car.
Yes it is. The 300 / 200 / 700 / 900 series are all 1/2" spanner and crowbar
to service in 5 mins, everything seems to have built-in instructions on how
to dis-assemble / repair with the minimum of fuss.
The S70 is much more fit and forget, when something breaks or reaches the
end of its life you replace it. That said, non of the 800 / 70series cars
we've had have ever needed much more than fuel, oil and filters.
The lower ball joint on the 70 series can be replace on its own, whereas
like you say 90% of 800's need the lower arm replaced, however in nearly
200k miles i've never needed to.
Anti roll bar plasitc links were very weak on the early 800's and scarcely
lasted longer than 25k, whereas seeminly the same thing never wears on the
70 series until a high mileage.
The build quality is far advanced on the 800 series cars, which in some
areas have a 'thrown together in time for launch' aura about them. IMHO
Volvo were about went out the window the moment they started building cars
out of Sweden.
>snip>>
> S70 timing belt took me 4 hours (my 240 took me 1 hour, on my first
> try). Yes, a front wheel drive will be inherently more difficult,
> but still... At least they partly straightened out by redesigning
> the tensioner in mid 1998. Either version is still inferior in
> simplicity and cost to the tensioner on the old four cylinders.
Once you have done one, the next will take you almost no time at all. It is
fiddly, but the trick is to strip everything out of the way first. Having to
remove the plug cover and fuel lines to get the belt cover off is silly I
admit but there is actually plenty of room and more over you can easily see
the timing marks.
The other annoying thing with 97/98 cars is the uncertainty of a hydraulic
tensioner or mechanical one until you have got the cover off which
necessitates a different belt.
Ford taking control is a whole new can of worms, but in some ways it's done
Ford a good turn. After all nothing is going to touch new Focus ST with the
Volvo 5 pot turbo, Volvo 6 speed box and Volvo AWD in it when it arrives!
Ford's moto always has been 'if you cant make something work, buy something
in that does, and sell something back' i.e. Drivetrain from Volvo for the
Focus, suspension / handling package back for the S40.
And my god have you seen the new C70?!!?!?
Tim..
AB - 21 Sep 2005 01:28 GMT
4 Hours to do a timing belt???!!!
Love to know what you were doing as I did my last one in 1 hour, including
new water pump, idler and tensioner...(after 170,000 miles I figured it was
time).
As for removing fuel lines - why? I only found it necessary to remove the
cam cover top, middle and lower sections, serpentine belt and there it all
was in all its glory... Easiest belt change I've ever done!
Alastair
-----------------------------------------------
A hitman is way cheaper than a divorce lawyer
-----------------------------------------------
>> Boy, Volvo sure has gone backwards. My 850 is a joy to do an oil change
>> on. The fill cap is on the top of the engine, large and level. The oil
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> cars for DIYers. It aggravates me and I hesitate to work on my own car
> sometimes.
~^ beancounter ~^ - 22 Sep 2005 18:17 GMT
AB >> 170,000 miles on a s80? what are your thought of the car after
this many miles?...thanx...