Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Volvo Cars / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

850 Wagon - General Comparison Specs?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
blurp - 16 Dec 2005 15:51 GMT
Hi all,

I'm having trouble finding specs I can use for comparison between
different models of Volvo wagons. I'm looking to make the move to a
wagon before the middle of January and, although the 850 seems like a
very nice car, I am not sure how it stacks up compared to, say, a 940
in terms of things like turning radius (because of FWD) and cargo
space. The sort of info you find in the last few pages of the owners
manuals rather than opinions. (BTW have you seen how many Volvo
entries there are on epinions.com?)

I've also noticed that a very frequent complaint with the 240 wagon is
the failure of wires in the tailgate, has this been addressed in other
models?

Of course, if anyone has dire warnings about the risks of any
particular year or model (eg. I read that 1994 960s needed timing
belts replaced every 30K due to a design error) feel free to weigh in.

Thanks,
blurp
blurp - 20 Dec 2005 16:46 GMT
Ok, I've driven the 850 Turbo, which seems peppy like I like it, and
an 850GLE which was pretty weak... a real A-to-B car with little in
between. I'm amazed at how similar the interior dimensions are to the
240, much roomier than the 760.

Is there reason to expect a 940 NA to perform any better than the NA
850, since it too has a 4-cylinder engine?

Thanks,
blurp

>Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>Thanks,
>blurp
James Sweet - 20 Dec 2005 19:20 GMT
> Ok, I've driven the 850 Turbo, which seems peppy like I like it, and
> an 850GLE which was pretty weak... a real A-to-B car with little in
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Is there reason to expect a 940 NA to perform any better than the NA
> 850, since it too has a 4-cylinder engine?

The 850 has a 5 cylinder engine, hence the 5 in the middle of the badge
number.

Yes I know, the 760 Turbo was an exception to this but for the most part
the middle number relates to the engine.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.