Car Forum / Volvo Cars / August 2006
I've finally figured out what's wrong with today's Volvo!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jamie - 01 Aug 2006 04:24 GMT [A Diatribe]
Men, hear this. I am not a sexist, but I am a man and by the grace of testosterone and gear oil, I believe I finally understand.
Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name of a ball-bearing company turned auto legend. Volvo - it's icon the symbol of Mars, God of war.
Volvo -- a car whose origin spawned into legend after creating a strong, simple, safe machine whose reputation for protecting it's passengers evolved into legend. Until one day...
Volvo was the car every man loved to turn a wrench on. We wouldn't be caught holding hands with one, but women around the world held them with pride and honor -- like their "man."
Volvo was a what we didn't brag about driving, but we rested soundly each night our wife, mother or loved one drove home in one. To soccer practice, to the movies or dinner -- we'd think, "they're boxy, but they're safe." When caught driving our Volvo - we'd say, "it's mom's or the wife's car." We hid our machismo, but we were confident we were safe.
Then one fateful day our God of war was purchased by Ford. Everything changed. Ford needed sales. Volvo needed sales. Ford needed the purchasing power of men to boost the bottom line like a man needs the boost of a turbo to bring him to redline.
Friends, I don't know if what happened next was Volvo becoming a Metrosexual or a homosexual -- but somewhere along the assembly line manhood was lost!
Volvos became more like our female counterparts -- complicated, tricky, incomprehensible. Suddenly raw power and strength became complex anatomy. The body parts seemed to have a mind of their own.
There were hot flashes, breakdowns, highway menopauses. What once was a sturdy corpse suddenly became an intricate, delicate, psychological nightmare.
Men drove their machines to the mechanic doctors. "What's wrong with my car," we asked. The response, "your car?" Why there's nothing wrong with your car -- it must be you!"
That's when we knew we'd lost our Volvo.
Our machines became "pretty" and "ergonomical". Studly physique was exchanged for smoother curves and softer body lines.
Well, men of the world hear me well. Volvo, the ball-bearing ancestor of us men has lost its balls.
I say, give us back our manly machine that we once understood. Forget the glitz and glamour, forget the polish and perfume. I want my machine!
Ford/Volvo -- we may not have bragged about owning or driving you, but you know when your ball bearings itched we men scratched them! When your lug nuts were loose we tightened them. When you broke down, you didn't cry. You were a non-interference engine who simply stopped until we put another belt around your waist and we drove on!
So, either change the name from Volvo to Avon, or give us back what we once were proud of.
Jamie
Michael Pardee - 01 Aug 2006 04:33 GMT So... does Volvo need another symbol? A fleur-de-lis perhaps?
Paul_B - 01 Aug 2006 08:34 GMT > Then one fateful day our God of war was purchased by Ford. Everything > changed. but the drive-by-wire S60 was designed before Ford bought in.
p.
zencraps@comcast.net - 01 Aug 2006 16:05 GMT An encouraging note on old vs. new technology...
Mercedes introduced a "brake by wire" non-hydraulic braking system a few years ago.
Consensus is: it sucked.
Grabby, can't modulate.
The newest E series dropped it, and reverted back to good old hydraulic brakes.
Johan Plane - 01 Aug 2006 16:17 GMT > An encouraging note on old vs. new technology... > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > The newest E series dropped it, and reverted back to good old hydraulic > brakes. Hear, Hear! Well said!!
Johan Plane Uppsala, Sweden
Robert - 01 Aug 2006 16:33 GMT Volvos have always been a higher-priced brand (they're not exactly economy cars) but that was due to build quality, their safety reputation, and reliablity. Now Ford has ruined the build quality and reliability of the cars not through "female-ization," though it is a nice metaphor, but by simple cost-cutting.
Why was the six-cylinder engine introduced when more horsepower could have been squeezed out of the reliable five? Simple -- this way "Volvo" engineers can design the engine and slap it into a Ford Freestyle, allowing Ford to charge more for its own crappy cars. Then, because five-cylinders aren't mainstream, Ford decides to phase them out of Volvos and put in all six-cylinders. They've just taken their prize goose out to the backyard and shot it right there.
Ford also has begun to use cheaper materials in the cars themselves, introduce new technology that no one really uses (do you REALLY need parking assistance in a C70 convertible, or a back-up camera on an S80?), and charge more for cars that are now worth much less.
If you ask me, Volvo might as well be Oldsmobile. I'd go for a nice, reliable, quality Honda, Acura, Toyota, or Lexus instead now. Volvo gave up my loyalty when the execs saw dollars instead of people -- and cashed in.
zencraps@comcast.net - 01 Aug 2006 16:38 GMT > If you ask me, Volvo might as well be Oldsmobile. The Volvo 740 is the Buick that GM wishes it could have built.
Johan Plane - 02 Aug 2006 00:41 GMT > Volvos have always been a higher-priced brand (they're not exactly > economy cars) but that was due to build quality, their safety [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > gave up my loyalty when the execs saw dollars instead of people -- and > cashed in.
>Why was the six-cylinder engine introduced when more horsepower could >have been squeezed out of the reliable five? Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but that was a technique Volvo either didn't master, didn't trust or didn't think there could be a market for. Oh - yes there was a five-cylinder engine Volvo used in their 240-series. A diesel built by VW.
>Ford also has begun to use cheaper materials in the cars themselves, >introduce new technology that no one really uses (do you REALLY need >parking assistance in a C70 convertible, or a back-up camera on an >S80?) Yes you need this techique when you have made a plastic puzzle of rear and front bumper and use thin crap sheet metal in body and chassis. Praise the days when the Volvo was a Tank in disguise, with shockabsorbing rubbercovered bumpers.
Furthermore, then even a low- to middle income family could still afford to travel safely. Todays Volvo has moved from middle- to upper segment.
Johan
~^ beancounter ~^ - 02 Aug 2006 01:22 GMT "Yes you need this techique when you have made a plastic puzzle of rear and front bumper and use thin crap sheet metal in body and chassis. Praise the days when the Volvo was a Tank in disguise, with shockabsorbing rubbercovered bumpers."
its all about weight & miles per gallon now....
> > Volvos have always been a higher-priced brand (they're not exactly > > economy cars) but that was due to build quality, their safety [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Johan James Sweet - 02 Aug 2006 01:31 GMT > Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no > engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but > that was a technique Volvo either didn't master, didn't trust or didn't > think there could be a market for. Oh - yes there was a five-cylinder > engine Volvo used in their 240-series. A diesel built by VW. That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's until the 850 series.
Johan Plane - 02 Aug 2006 12:09 GMT > > Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no > > engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's > until the 850 series. You're right and I'm wrong. Must have been tired, I even owned one of them
:-). Johan
Mike F - 02 Aug 2006 13:03 GMT > > That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's > > until the 850 series. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Johan There was a 5 cylinder version of the VW inline 6 diesel used in the 240 in certain, limited markets.
 Signature Mike F. Thornhill (near Toronto), Ont.
Replace tt with t (twice!) and remove parentheses to email me directly. (But I check the newsgroup more often than this email address.)
John Horner - 02 Aug 2006 22:12 GMT >> Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no >> engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's > until the 850 series. That was a VW/Audi unit Volvo purchased from them.
John
Joerg Lorenz - 03 Aug 2006 02:22 GMT Am Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:12:26 GMT schrieb John Horner:
>>> Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no >>> engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's >> until the 850 series. The 850 had the Audi 5 cylinder TDI (an inline-design) with 140hp in the 90s until Volvo developped its own 5 cylinder (a joint design between Volvo and Porsche) as Diesel. The current Diesel-engines are an offspring of the gasoline version and are sold as 163hp and 185hp versions in Europe (I don't know about other regions).
> That was a VW/Audi unit Volvo purchased from them. > > John Joerg
 Signature De gustibus non est disputandum
John Horner - 02 Aug 2006 22:11 GMT >>Why was the six-cylinder engine introduced when more horsepower could >>have been squeezed out of the reliable five? Just to set the record straight: In the early 1990s Volvo introduced an entirely new family of modern overhead cam engines to replace the aged "red-block" family. This new family is often called the "white-block" engines by Volvo enthusiasts as the blocks are plain cast aluminium.
This new family of engines shares many common components and features while being made in 4, 5 and 6 cylinder in-line versions. The 6 was introduced in the 960, the 5 in the 850 and I believe the 4 was first used in the S40. There are also two valve per cylinder and four valve per cylinder versions of at least the 5 cylinder and perhaps others as well. Turbocharging is also an optional feature.
Many parts are interchangeable between the various family members.
I don't believe any Ford branded vehicles have ever used any of these designs, but Volvo continues to use updated versions of the 5 and 6.
I'm not as sure about the 4 cylinder variations as they were not big in the US. Now that the S40 is Ford Focus based perhaps it is using Ford base engine designs, I really do not know.
The latest twist in the engine story is the V-8 introduced as an option for the XC90. This is actually a Yamaha produced motor and is an outgrowth of the Ford/Yamaha deal which once produced the engines for the Taurus SHO. I think Ford is also now considering selective use of this engine in other vehicles. Ford's V-8 product line consists of a home-grown series (Modular V-8), a Jaguar designed variation also used in the Lincoln LS and this Yamaha/Ford/Volvo beast. Sort of convoluted, and a situation which will probably be simplified as part of Ford's new "strategic realignment", aka Way Forward 2.0.
John
Jamie - 02 Aug 2006 01:48 GMT "Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name of a ball-bearing company turned auto legend. Volvo - it's icon the symbol of Mars, God of war. "
I still go back to ball-bearings. No balls and no bearing is a recipe for disaster.
F.O.R.D. Finance Or Refinance Daily
F.O.R.D. Forgot Our Real Dreams
F.O.R.D. Failure Of Real Design
etc, etc, etc
Johan Plane - 02 Aug 2006 12:34 GMT > "Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name > of [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > etc, etc, etc
>...Volvo - it's icon the symbol of Mars, God of war. " Ah, now I've got it. That's why they were built sturdy as Tanks.
I like the ball-bearing thing, since Volvo really was a company (not operative) owned by SKF.
The F.O.R.D. thingie: We have them in Sweden too but they would loose in translation. One survives: Flunk Or Repair Daily.
Johan Plane Uppsala Sweden
Stephen Henning - 02 Aug 2006 13:37 GMT > "Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name > of > a ball-bearing company turned auto legend. Volvo - it's icon the symbol > of Mars, God of war. " Close, but no cigar.
Yes, Volvo is Latin and means "I roll" since it was named after a previous ball bearing operation of SKF.
But the Volvo circle-and-arrow trademark was created to represent strength, taking its graphic shape from the traditional alchemist's symbol for iron ore. It originally represented the shield and spear of Mars, but was popularized as the alchemical symbol for iron. Needless to say it is also an astronomical symbol and gender symbol.
see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchemical_symbol
 Signature Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '01 Volvos. The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '01 through European Delivery. http://home.earthlink.net/~rotarians/volvo.html
Duke W - 05 Aug 2006 09:08 GMT Lost their rocks, eh? Have you driven the new V8? Heh....
> [A Diatribe] > [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > > Jamie
|
|
|