Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Volvo Cars / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I've finally figured out what's wrong with today's Volvo!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jamie - 01 Aug 2006 04:24 GMT
[A Diatribe]

Men, hear this. I am not a sexist, but I am a man and by the grace of
testosterone and gear oil, I believe I finally understand.

Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name of
a ball-bearing company turned auto legend. Volvo - it's icon the symbol
of Mars, God of war.

Volvo -- a car whose origin spawned into legend after creating a
strong, simple, safe machine whose reputation for protecting it's
passengers evolved into legend. Until one day...

Volvo was the car every man loved to turn a wrench on. We wouldn't be
caught holding hands with one, but women around the world held them
with pride and honor -- like their "man."

Volvo was a what we didn't brag about driving, but we rested soundly
each night our wife, mother or loved one drove home in one. To soccer
practice, to the movies or dinner -- we'd think, "they're boxy, but
they're safe."  When caught driving our Volvo - we'd say, "it's mom's
or the wife's car."  We hid our machismo, but we were confident we were
safe.

Then one fateful day our God of war was purchased by Ford. Everything
changed. Ford needed sales. Volvo needed sales. Ford needed the
purchasing power of men to boost the bottom line like a man needs the
boost of a turbo to bring him to redline.

Friends, I don't know if what happened next was Volvo becoming a
Metrosexual or a homosexual -- but somewhere along the assembly line
manhood was lost!

Volvos became more like our female counterparts -- complicated, tricky,
incomprehensible. Suddenly raw power and strength became complex
anatomy. The body parts seemed to have a mind of their own.

There were hot flashes, breakdowns, highway menopauses. What once was a
sturdy corpse suddenly became an intricate, delicate, psychological
nightmare.

Men drove their machines to the mechanic doctors. "What's wrong with my
car," we asked. The response, "your car?" Why there's nothing wrong
with your car -- it must be you!"

That's when we knew we'd lost our Volvo.

Our machines became "pretty" and "ergonomical". Studly physique was
exchanged for smoother curves and softer body lines.

Well, men of the world hear me well. Volvo, the ball-bearing ancestor
of us men has lost its balls.

I say, give us back our manly machine that we once understood. Forget
the glitz and glamour, forget the polish and perfume. I want my
machine!

Ford/Volvo -- we may not have bragged about owning or driving you, but
you know when your ball bearings itched we men scratched them! When
your lug nuts were loose we tightened them. When you broke down, you
didn't cry. You were a non-interference engine who simply stopped until
we put another belt around your waist and we drove on!

So, either change the name from Volvo to Avon, or give us back what we
once were proud of.

Jamie
Michael Pardee - 01 Aug 2006 04:33 GMT
So... does Volvo need another symbol? A fleur-de-lis perhaps?
Paul_B - 01 Aug 2006 08:34 GMT
> Then one fateful day our God of war was purchased by Ford. Everything
> changed.

but the drive-by-wire S60 was designed before Ford bought in.

p.
zencraps@comcast.net - 01 Aug 2006 16:05 GMT
An encouraging note on old vs. new technology...

Mercedes introduced a "brake by wire" non-hydraulic braking system a
few years ago.

Consensus is: it sucked.

Grabby, can't modulate.

The newest E series dropped it, and reverted back to good old hydraulic
brakes.
Johan Plane - 01 Aug 2006 16:17 GMT
> An encouraging note on old vs. new technology...
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The newest E series dropped it, and reverted back to good old hydraulic
> brakes.

Hear, Hear! Well said!!

Johan Plane
Uppsala, Sweden
Robert - 01 Aug 2006 16:33 GMT
Volvos have always been a higher-priced brand (they're not exactly
economy cars) but that was due to build quality, their safety
reputation, and reliablity. Now Ford has ruined the build quality and
reliability of the cars not through "female-ization," though it is a
nice metaphor, but by simple cost-cutting.

Why was the six-cylinder engine introduced when more horsepower could
have been squeezed out of the reliable five? Simple -- this way "Volvo"
engineers can design the engine and slap it into a Ford Freestyle,
allowing Ford to charge more for its own crappy cars. Then, because
five-cylinders aren't mainstream, Ford decides to phase them out of
Volvos and put in all six-cylinders. They've just taken their prize
goose out to the backyard and shot it right there.

Ford also has begun to use cheaper materials in the cars themselves,
introduce new technology that no one really uses (do you REALLY need
parking assistance in a C70 convertible, or a back-up camera on an
S80?), and charge more for cars that are now worth much less.

If you ask me, Volvo might as well be Oldsmobile. I'd go for a nice,
reliable, quality Honda, Acura, Toyota, or Lexus instead now. Volvo
gave up my loyalty when the execs saw dollars instead of people -- and
cashed in.
zencraps@comcast.net - 01 Aug 2006 16:38 GMT
> If you ask me, Volvo might as well be Oldsmobile.

The Volvo 740 is the Buick that GM wishes it could have built.
Johan Plane - 02 Aug 2006 00:41 GMT
> Volvos have always been a higher-priced brand (they're not exactly
> economy cars) but that was due to build quality, their safety
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> gave up my loyalty when the execs saw dollars instead of people -- and
> cashed in.

>Why was the six-cylinder engine introduced when more horsepower could
>have been squeezed out of the reliable five?

Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no
engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but
that was a technique Volvo either didn't master, didn't trust or didn't
think there could be a market for. Oh - yes there was a five-cylinder
engine Volvo used in their 240-series. A diesel built by VW.

>Ford also has begun to use cheaper materials in the cars themselves,
>introduce new technology that no one really uses (do you REALLY need
>parking assistance in a C70 convertible, or a back-up camera on an
>S80?)

Yes you need this techique when you have made a plastic puzzle of rear and
front bumper and use thin crap sheet metal in body and chassis. Praise the
days when the Volvo was a Tank in disguise, with shockabsorbing
rubbercovered bumpers.

Furthermore, then even a low- to middle income family could still afford to
travel safely. Todays Volvo has moved from middle- to upper segment.

Johan
~^ beancounter ~^ - 02 Aug 2006 01:22 GMT
"Yes you need this techique when you have made a plastic puzzle of rear
and
front bumper and use thin crap sheet metal in body and chassis. Praise
the
days when the Volvo was a Tank in disguise, with shockabsorbing
rubbercovered bumpers."

its all about weight & miles per gallon now....

> > Volvos have always been a higher-priced brand (they're not exactly
> > economy cars) but that was due to build quality, their safety
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
>
> Johan
James Sweet - 02 Aug 2006 01:31 GMT
> Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no
> engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but
> that was a technique Volvo either didn't master, didn't trust or didn't
> think there could be a market for. Oh - yes there was a five-cylinder
> engine Volvo used in their 240-series. A diesel built by VW.

That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's
until the 850 series.
Johan Plane - 02 Aug 2006 12:09 GMT
> > Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no
> > engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's
> until the 850 series.

You're right and I'm wrong. Must have been tired, I even owned one of them
:-).

Johan
Mike F - 02 Aug 2006 13:03 GMT
> > That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's
> > until the 850 series.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Johan

There was a 5 cylinder version of the VW inline 6 diesel used in the 240
in certain, limited markets.

Signature

Mike F.
Thornhill (near Toronto), Ont.

Replace tt with t (twice!) and remove parentheses to email me directly.
(But I check the newsgroup more often than this email address.)

John Horner - 02 Aug 2006 22:12 GMT
>> Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no
>> engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's
> until the 850 series.

That was a VW/Audi unit Volvo purchased from them.

John
Joerg Lorenz - 03 Aug 2006 02:22 GMT
Am Wed, 02 Aug 2006 21:12:26 GMT schrieb John Horner:

>>> Simple. The five-cylinder motor didn't exist in 1977/78 so there was no
>>> engine to squeeze anything from. Saab had just testing turboengines, but
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> That was a 6 cylinder inline Diesel, I'm not aware of any Volvo 5's
>> until the 850 series.

The 850 had the Audi 5 cylinder TDI (an inline-design) with 140hp in the
90s until Volvo developped its own 5 cylinder (a joint design between
Volvo and Porsche) as Diesel. The current Diesel-engines are an
offspring of the gasoline version and are sold as 163hp and 185hp
versions in Europe (I don't know about other regions).

> That was a VW/Audi unit Volvo purchased from them.
>
> John
Joerg

Signature

De gustibus non est disputandum

John Horner - 02 Aug 2006 22:11 GMT
>>Why was the six-cylinder engine introduced when more horsepower could
>>have been squeezed out of the reliable five?

Just to set the record straight:  In the early 1990s Volvo introduced an
entirely new family of modern overhead cam engines to replace the aged
"red-block" family.  This new family is often called the "white-block"
engines by Volvo enthusiasts as the blocks are plain cast aluminium.

This new family of engines shares many common components and features
while being made in 4, 5 and 6 cylinder in-line versions.  The 6 was
introduced in the 960, the 5 in the 850 and I believe the 4 was first
used in the S40.   There are also two valve per cylinder and four valve
per cylinder versions of at least the 5 cylinder and perhaps others as
well.  Turbocharging is also an optional feature.

Many parts are interchangeable between the various family members.

I don't believe any Ford branded vehicles have ever used any of these
designs, but Volvo continues to use updated versions of the 5 and 6.

I'm not as sure about the 4 cylinder variations as they were not big in
the US.  Now that the S40 is Ford Focus based perhaps it is using Ford
base engine designs, I really do not know.

The latest twist in the engine story is the V-8 introduced as an option
for the XC90.  This is actually a Yamaha produced motor and is an
outgrowth of the Ford/Yamaha deal which once produced the engines for
the Taurus SHO.  I think Ford is also now considering selective use of
this engine in other vehicles.  Ford's V-8 product line consists of a
home-grown series (Modular V-8), a Jaguar designed variation also used
in the Lincoln LS and this Yamaha/Ford/Volvo beast.  Sort of convoluted,
and a situation which will probably be simplified as part of Ford's new
"strategic realignment", aka Way Forward 2.0.

John
Jamie - 02 Aug 2006 01:48 GMT
"Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name
of
a ball-bearing company turned auto legend. Volvo - it's icon the symbol
of Mars, God of war. "

I still go back to ball-bearings. No balls and no bearing is a recipe
for disaster.

F.O.R.D.
Finance Or Refinance Daily

F.O.R.D.
Forgot Our Real Dreams

F.O.R.D.
Failure Of Real Design

etc, etc, etc
Johan Plane - 02 Aug 2006 12:34 GMT
> "Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name
> of
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> etc, etc, etc

>...Volvo - it's icon the symbol of Mars, God of war. "

Ah, now I've got it. That's why they were built sturdy as Tanks.

I like the ball-bearing thing, since Volvo really was a company (not
operative) owned by SKF.

The F.O.R.D. thingie:
We have them in Sweden too but they would loose in translation. One
survives:
Flunk Or Repair Daily.

Johan Plane
Uppsala Sweden
Stephen Henning - 02 Aug 2006 13:37 GMT
> "Volvo -- a Latin term whose meaning is "I Roll"; founded on the name
> of
> a ball-bearing company turned auto legend. Volvo - it's icon the symbol
> of Mars, God of war. "

Close, but no cigar.

Yes, Volvo is Latin and means "I roll" since it was named after a
previous ball bearing operation of SKF.

But the Volvo circle-and-arrow trademark was created to represent
strength, taking its graphic shape from the traditional alchemist's
symbol for iron ore.  It originally represented the shield and spear of
Mars, but was popularized as the alchemical symbol for iron.  Needless
to say it is also an astronomical symbol and gender symbol.

see:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchemical_symbol
Signature

Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
   Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '01 Volvos.
   The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '01 through European Delivery.
 http://home.earthlink.net/~rotarians/volvo.html

Duke W - 05 Aug 2006 09:08 GMT
Lost their rocks, eh?  Have you driven the new V8?  Heh....

> [A Diatribe]
>
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
>
> Jamie
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.