Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Volvo Cars / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PCV Box, performance, and root cause of sludge?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Hollywood - 25 Aug 2006 14:47 GMT
I have a 99 Volvo s-80 2.9L non-turbo. I have been through a lot with
the car that I won't get into but the latest is that the dealer's
service people say that the car needs a new PCV box because it is
sludged closed, they think. I am a little skeptical, especially when
they quoted me an $800 fix including a $150 price tag for the part. I
looked at the service bulletin and it said "get to it, clean it and
retest... 55 steps or so." I also found the part online, at the second
site I looked at costing $33.42. Unless my dealership is getting the
part directly from Sweeden in a lacquered wood box on a velvet pillow,
I don't see $120 in markup on the part being justified, even at the
dealer. Additionally, my car is popping a code for something completely
different.

So, the first question is this: In driving the car, would I notice a
problem with the PCV box in the performance of the car? If so, what
would that be?

The second question is: Is replacing the PCV box something that I
should have expected in 95K miles of driving the car? If not, what
might be causing the sludge that may or may not be there and is this
something that might need addressing (likely more expensive
addressing)? If so, who the Hell designs a car with something that is
definitely going to go wrong that takes four hours of labor to get to
and put back? I love driving the car, but  hate fixing it. Next car
will likely be Toyota or Honda at this rate.
Mike F - 25 Aug 2006 21:15 GMT
> I have a 99 Volvo s-80 2.9L non-turbo. I have been through a lot with
> the car that I won't get into but the latest is that the dealer's
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> and put back? I love driving the car, but  hate fixing it. Next car
> will likely be Toyota or Honda at this rate.

What sludges up the PCV box is not changing oil often enough.  The lower
quality the oil is, the worse the sludging.  I've seen sludged up
engines with less that 30k miles.  As it clogs up, it loses
effectiveness in pulling the oil vapours out of the blow by gases, thus
increasing oil consumption.  As the box clogs further, there is not
enough flow area for these gases, and pressure builds up.  This will
cause oil leaks, and as increased amounts of oil end up in the intake
manifold, coating throttle bodies, oxygen sensors and catalytic
converters.  

740s and 240s have this same problem, symptoms just aren't as
noticeable.  Their oil traps aren't as complex, so they stay functional
longer.

I would imagine the dealer's $150 includes hoses and clamps, which
should all be changed at the same time and gaskets to put everything
back together.

Nice how Volvo doesn't take ownership of this problem, instead hitting
owners for "maintenance".

Signature

Mike F.
Thornhill (near Toronto), Ont.

Replace tt with t (twice!) and remove parentheses to email me directly.
(But I check the newsgroup more often than this email address.)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.