Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Volvo Cars / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

850 Wagon, Check engine light?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Atif - 26 Oct 2006 19:23 GMT
Can a bad muffler cause the check engine light in my '96 850 wagon to
come on?

I had noticed the car was getting a little louder and then the check
engine light came on.  When I took the car for an oil change my Volvo
garage said that there were two codes for the o2 sensor.

They quoted me about $250 for the muffler and about $200 for the sensor.

What I'm wondering is if there is a hole/crack in the muffler, could
that create a back draft or something that made the computer say that
the o2 sensor was bad?

-Atif
John Horner - 26 Oct 2006 21:02 GMT
> Can a bad muffler cause the check engine light in my '96 850 wagon to
> come on?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> -Atif

It is probably coincidental that the muffler and O2 sensor are going bad
at about the same time.

John
Atif - 27 Oct 2006 01:03 GMT
> It is probably coincidental that the muffler and O2 sensor are going bad
> at about the same time.
>
> John

O.K. thanks the input.
Michael Pardee - 27 Oct 2006 02:10 GMT
> Can a bad muffler cause the check engine light in my '96 850 wagon to
> come on?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> -Atif

It is certainly possible, especially if the sensor identified is the #2
sensor, the one after the converter. It makes sense to me to have the
muffler work done and then see if the O2 sensor codes go away. My hunch is
that they will, but that's only a hunch. If the codes point to the #1
sensor, the one before the converter, it is less likely.

Mike
Atif - 28 Oct 2006 00:29 GMT
> It is certainly possible, especially if the sensor identified is the #2
> sensor, the one after the converter. It makes sense to me to have the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mike

Mike, on the receipt under comments it said something like "error code
o2 #2"

I didn't know there were two o2 sensors.  It has been a few days and the
check engine light has NOT come back on yet... I think I'll follow your
advice, have the muffler done before having the sensor done, especially
if the check engine light doesn't come on right away.  I assume if the
sensor was really really bad, then it would come on pretty quickly.

Thanks,
-Atif
Michael Pardee - 28 Oct 2006 05:54 GMT
>> It is certainly possible, especially if the sensor identified is the #2
>> sensor, the one after the converter. It makes sense to me to have the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thanks,
> -Atif

Sounds good to me. The front O2 sensor provides the feedback to adjust the
mixture, while the rear one just monitors the output of the catalytic
converter to see if the whole system is working right - particularly the
converter. It doesn't take much air on that one to convince it something is
wrong. The second sensors were mandated by the US OBDII standard in 1996,
but I imagine other countries required them earlier than that.

Mike
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.