> R134a isn't as environmentally friendly as was supposed. That doesn't
> mean I'm blindly endorsing any alternatives, just that we shouldn't think
> that this particular problem is already solved.
And R134a was just recently found to be carcinogenic and apparently
will be replaced in the coming years. It's very hard to get any
refrigerants in Canada or Ontario at least. So Duracool appeared to me
to be the only solution. I will wait until this weekend to take a
gauge reading to see if any "gas" has escaped. When I left the dealer
I specifically asked to have the system evacuated so I am leary of the
"enough gas to detect a leak" explanation. Still working perfectly
today when it's 30 degrees and humid as hell. Toronto is in a fog....
Jordan B 1999 S70 Loaded!
> > R134a isn't as environmentally friendly as was supposed. That doesn't
> > mean I'm blindly endorsing any alternatives, just that we shouldn't think
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> refrigeration system. Same stuff, but if used as a refrigerant it falls
> under different regulations.
viktor - 01 Jun 2007 15:29 GMT
> And R134a was just recently found to be carcinogenic
Could you please cite the scientific source of that statement?
Regards
Viktor
The e-mail address in the header is never read
For private e-mail please use vikwei at gmx dot at
Aawara Chowdhury - 02 Jun 2007 14:21 GMT
> And R134a was just recently found to be carcinogenic
Rubbish, rubbish, and more rubbish.
Here's what the IARC, NTP, OSHA, and ACGIH have to say about R-134a.
"Carcinogenicity Information
None of the components present in this material at concentrations
equal to or greater than 0.1% are listed by IARC, NTP, OSHA or ACGIH
as a carcinogen."
Finally, to the best of my knowledge, here in the US, the EPA doesn't
permit the use of HC-12a or Duracool 12a for mobile applications.
AC

Signature
Email: echo 36434455860060025978157675027927670979097959886449930P | dc