>On Jun 15, 4:29 pm, c.fied...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:19:16 -0700, byrocat
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>originating posters name was possibly the same the same or very
>similar to Stephen Horrillo.
Apparently the poor bastard was lost without alt.autos.jaguar and had
to spam the entire alt.autos domain. IMNSHO, you buy a Jaguar, you get
what you deserve.
Again, my *on topic* Volvo came from CarMax and, now that it's ten
years old (five years after purchase from CarMax), I am still quite
pleased.
Roadie - 18 Jun 2007 16:52 GMT
On Jun 18, 11:36 am, c.fied...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> >On Jun 15, 4:29 pm, c.fied...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
> >> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:19:16 -0700, byrocat
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> to spam the entire alt.autos domain. IMNSHO, you buy a Jaguar, you get
> what you deserve.
Yes, Jaguar has a reputation for producing cars that were unreliable
although I understand that quality improved in a relative sense. The
cars themselves are decidedly less fun and more generic looking than
was once the case.
> Again, my *on topic* Volvo came from CarMax and, now that it's ten
> years old (five years after purchase from CarMax), I am still quite
> pleased.- Hide quoted text -
Agreed. My exeriences at Carmax have been the same. Low pressure
sales of cars that are in really good condition.
> - Show quoted text -