> We bought it
> because it's the format we like (3-door) looks great, is well appointed,
> drives well and is (for the moment) a little more exclusive on the
> Australian roads.
The 3-door format may look good but the doors are much larger and much
more difficult to use when parked next to other cars. Of course some
people are more concerned about looks than practical matters.

Signature
Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '01 Volvos.
The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '01 through European Delivery.
http://rhodyman.net/homevo.html
Mal from Oz. - 26 Sep 2007 02:14 GMT
Concur, you do need to be careful when opening the doors. This is my 3rd
hatch so I'm quite used to squeezing out through the small gap - it also
helps that my wife and are are not endowed with the 'tall' gene!
Mind you the worst one we had was a Mitsubishi Lancer my wife had a few
years back, the doors were bloody huge
It's just a pity other people are not as careful when they open their's.
Cheers
Mal
Oz
>> We bought it
>> because it's the format we like (3-door) looks great, is well appointed,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> more difficult to use when parked next to other cars. Of course some
> people are more concerned about looks than practical matters.
Espressopithecus (Java Man) <Espressopithecus - 29 Sep 2007 01:41 GMT
> > We bought it
> > because it's the format we like (3-door) looks great, is well appointed,
> > drives well and is (for the moment) a little more exclusive on the
> > Australian roads.
Added to that, the
Espressopithecus (Java Man) <Espressopithecus - 29 Sep 2007 01:44 GMT
> > We bought it
> > because it's the format we like (3-door) looks great, is well appointed,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> more difficult to use when parked next to other cars. Of course some
> people are more concerned about looks than practical matters.
On top of that, the rear hatch is so darned small that the C30 is less
useful than a 1990 Honda Civic hatchback! You'd have a hard time
squeezing a boxed full-size microwave oven into the back. Too bad - I
really like the styling.
~^ beancounter ~^ - 29 Sep 2007 02:28 GMT
to me, volvo is still all about safety...how will the c30
do in a blunt/fast collision w/a gmc yukon ?
On Sep 28, 6:44 pm, Espressopithecus (Java Man)
<Espressopithecus<java...@espresso.org>> wrote:
> In article <pighash-2CFEBC.11125025092...@news.isp.giganews.com>,
> pigh...@aol.com says...> "Mal from Oz." <her...@am.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> squeezing a boxed full-size microwave oven into the back. Too bad - I
> really like the styling.
Mal from Oz - 29 Sep 2007 07:39 GMT
Not very well I'd suggest.
Then I'm not one to go through life wondering 'what if?'

Signature
Cheers
Mal
Oz
http://maloz.bigblog.com.au/index.do
> to me, volvo is still all about safety...how will the c30
> do in a blunt/fast collision w/a gmc yukon ?
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> squeezing a boxed full-size microwave oven into the back. Too bad - I
>> really like the styling.
Mal from Oz - 29 Sep 2007 07:36 GMT
If you want to regularly move big stuff, don't but the bloody C30 then !
or pay the microwave shop to deliver the darn thing !

Signature
Cheers
Mal
Oz
http://maloz.bigblog.com.au/index.do
"Espressopithecus (Java Man) >" <Espressopithecus<javaman@espresso.org>
wrote in message
news:MPG.21673fb55fee33469898cb@shawnews.vc.shawcable.net...
>>
>> > We bought it
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> squeezing a boxed full-size microwave oven into the back. Too bad - I
> really like the styling.
Espressopithecus (Java Man) <Espressopithecus - 30 Sep 2007 23:56 GMT
> If you want to regularly move big stuff, don't but the bloody C30 then !
I don't consider a microwave oven to be "big stuff". Most 2-door
hatches will handle a microwave with ease -- including a 1990 Honda
Civic.
Java