Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Car Forum / Volkswagen / Water Cooled Volkswagen Cars / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Passat 1.8T timing belt

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Geoff Hammond - 18 Dec 2006 05:37 GMT
I was told that the timing belt on my Passat 1.8T "showed signs of wear" and
should be replaced.  I was surprised as the car has only 31K miles (48K
kilometers) on it -- is this unusual, or what?

Geoff Hammond
LeakiestWink - 18 Dec 2006 10:03 GMT
>I was told that the timing belt on my Passat 1.8T "showed signs
>of wear" and should be replaced.  I was surprised as the car has
>only 31K miles (48K kilometers) on it -- is this unusual, or
>what?

How old is the car?

If you read your maintenance schedule in your service book, you
will see timing belts need changing at "xxxxx" miles OR "y"
years, whichever comes first.  It would be very risky, IMHO, to
leave a timing belt for longer than 4 years, irrespective of the
mileage covered.  Don't forget, all rubber items will deteriorate
with age - tyres should be changed after six years too.

Rgds, Sean
No Spam Please - 18 Dec 2006 16:08 GMT
>>I was told that the timing belt on my Passat 1.8T "showed signs of wear"
>>and should be replaced.  I was surprised as the car has only 31K miles
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Rgds, Sean

The book probably tells him to inspect the belt at 80K miles and change it
at 105K miles.  There is a high probability that the timing belt on this
engine will not make either mileage.

Failure of the belt itself is less common than a tensioner or water pump
failure on this engine.
Lost In Space/Woodchuck - 19 Dec 2006 04:03 GMT
Failure of the belt itself is less common than a tensioner or water pump
failure on this engine.

depends on the year. early 1.8t's had a poor tensioner design which was
replaced. If the tensioner failed on the early years the engine would make
noise from the tensioner bouncing around and the belt slapping. If the owner
continued to drive the car then the belt would fail. Also early 1.8t's the
water pump ran off the front pullies and not the t-belt.
Iain Miller - 18 Dec 2006 11:19 GMT
>I was told that the timing belt on my Passat 1.8T "showed signs of wear"
>and should be replaced.  I was surprised as the car has only 31K miles (48K
>kilometers) on it -- is this unusual, or what?
>
> Geoff Hammond

VAG timing belts for 1.8Ts used to be 80K miles. Then they upped it to 100K
miles. Now, suddenly about 6 mnths ago, ALL VAG engines are on 60K miles or
4 years, whichever is sooner.

You can see if the belt is wearing by removing the top timing belt cover.
You'll need to remove the engine cover (3 fasteners) and then unclip the
t-belt cover. If you see signs of wear on the belt or its more than 4 yrs
old then change it. That said, most of the timing belt problems are normally
caused by failing tensioners rather than failing belts.

I have heard of some belts failing as early as 40 K miles - seems to be a
bit of luck involved generally.

I.
No Spam Please - 18 Dec 2006 16:06 GMT
>I was told that the timing belt on my Passat 1.8T "showed signs of wear"
>and should be replaced.  I was surprised as the car has only 31K miles (48K
>kilometers) on it -- is this unusual, or what?
>
> Geoff Hammond

General rule of thumb for this engine (in spite of what VW recommends) is
60K miles.  31K seems very low, but I personally have never looked at one
short of a failure.

Was this a dealer or independent shop recommendation?  Given the cost
involved, I'd get a second opinion.
Lost In Space/Woodchuck - 19 Dec 2006 04:06 GMT
very odd at 30K miles but with age the belts rubber does get effected by
ozone/pollution in some cities. Maybe you need a second opinion concerning
the belt.

>I was told that the timing belt on my Passat 1.8T "showed signs of wear"
>and should be replaced.  I was surprised as the car has only 31K miles (48K
>kilometers) on it -- is this unusual, or what?
>
> Geoff Hammond
tnkgrl7 - 19 Dec 2006 08:30 GMT
On my passat, I should have followed the book as well, but on my way to
toronto, the belt decided to go. I had to buy a new belt, tensioner,
timing gear, all new exhaust valves from Germany, and a head gasket.
Now I change my timing belt every 30,000km or so. Don't take the
chance, trust me, it's damn expensive with the thought that, ahh,
she'll hold out for another 20,000km. Some good advice from the other
guys but preventitive maintence saves you ALOT of money and headaches.
dave AKA vwdoc1 - 19 Dec 2006 13:44 GMT
I agree with tnkgrl7, it is better to be safe and replace earlier than
needed.  I replace 16V timing belts at 40K miles since I have seen them
break at 45K miles.

> On my passat, I should have followed the book as well, but on my way to
> toronto, the belt decided to go. I had to buy a new belt, tensioner,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> she'll hold out for another 20,000km. Some good advice from the other
> guys but preventitive maintence saves you ALOT of money and headaches.
No Spam Please - 19 Dec 2006 16:19 GMT
Perhaps, but tnkgrl7 says she is now changing about every 18,000 miles
(30,000km).  An $800-1200 "preventive maintenance" bill every year and a
half or so is pretty hard to swallow for most owners.

From now on, "Just say 'no' to timing belts!"

>I agree with tnkgrl7, it is better to be safe and replace earlier than
>needed.  I replace 16V timing belts at 40K miles since I have seen them
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> she'll hold out for another 20,000km. Some good advice from the other
>> guys but preventitive maintence saves you ALOT of money and headaches.
dave AKA vwdoc1 - 20 Dec 2006 01:45 GMT
lol
Geez DO NOT change it TOO early like at every oil change!  lol
Just go by what is agreed upon by the group, 60K miles or 80K miles or ???
At least before the mileage interval when they usually break.

> Perhaps, but tnkgrl7 says she is now changing about every 18,000 miles
> (30,000km).  An $800-1200 "preventive maintenance" bill every year and a
> half or so is pretty hard to swallow for most owners.
>
> From now on, "Just say 'no' to timing belts!"
Geoff Hammond - 19 Dec 2006 22:49 GMT
The car is 4.5 years old (mid-2002 delivery), so maybe it's the age that's
got to it, not the use.

Geoff

> very odd at 30K miles but with age the belts rubber does get effected by
> ozone/pollution in some cities. Maybe you need a second opinion concerning
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
>> Geoff Hammond
tnkgrl7 - 19 Dec 2006 23:36 GMT
I agree with the "just say no to timing belts", lol. When I changed
mine, it didn't cost near to what you posted.  I bought the belt from
VW and did it myself, took mabey an hour. Even if you went to the
dealership, for people who don't have the time or the "know how", or
just dont want to, it would probably only cost $150.00-$175.00. That
being that shop rate doesnt go through the roof again, currently here
its $89.00/hr, and for technical, $96.00/hr. Also, there are some
really good EXCLUSIVE VW repair shops that dont charge out the nose.
BUT, don't be cheap to your VW, they know and get jealous. I've found
it to be wise to stick with someone who only does VW's simply because
other things don't get broken in the process and because they know what
they are doing which also cuts down on labour cost.
Mandie @k@ Zepherous - 25 Dec 2006 02:49 GMT
> I agree with the "just say no to timing belts", lol. When I changed
> mine, it didn't cost near to what you posted.  I bought the belt from
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> other things don't get broken in the process and because they know what
> they are doing which also cuts down on labour cost.

I recently bought a 98 golf cl tdi, changed the timing belt 'just in case'
the old belt looked pretty new but the tentioner
was in really bad condition, looked like the belt had been changed but not
the tentioner, cost £14 for the belt and £23 for the tentioner.
Took me around 2 hours as I'm more used to peugeots, but found it alot
easier than doing the belts on the peugeot,
only difficulty I found was getting the new fan belt on, guess I didn't have
the strength to pull the alternator back and put the belt on at the same
time...
any tips for next time?
Stefani Bowers - 25 Dec 2006 16:50 GMT
>> I agree with the "just say no to timing belts", lol. When I changed
>> mine, it didn't cost near to what you posted.  I bought the belt from
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> other things don't get broken in the process and because they know what
>> they are doing which also cuts down on labour cost.

snip------
> only difficulty I found was getting the new fan belt on, guess I didn't have
> the strength to pull the alternator back and put the belt on at the same
> time...
> any tips for next time?

A gorilla sized friend and a couple of beers always works for me :)
Mandie @k@ Zepherous - 29 Dec 2006 02:45 GMT
> snip------
>> only difficulty I found was getting the new fan belt on, guess I didn't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> A gorilla sized friend and a couple of beers always works for me :)

LOL, that's a much better solution than a large lever , sore knuckles and
jumping about swearing in the pouring rain :-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.