Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
Needs redesign for cam drive through gears or roller chain.
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Well I guess every manufacturer out there is turning out engines with a
fatal flaw. Many modern engines, including both diesel and gasoline from
every? manufacturer are "Interference" type and when that belt breaks so
goes the engine.
Every one of them comes with a maintenance schedule and on that schedule
is a recommended timing belt change, usually 60,000 to 120,000 miles or X
number of months which ever comes first.
I take it your timing belt broke? If so how many miles on the car? how
long since the last timing belt change?
It is not a flaw, it is just one choice of designs for an engine were
there are tradeoffs.
The list of manufacturers turning out those defective engines include
Yugo, Porsche, Lexus, Alpha Romao, Ford, GM and the list goes on. Check
out: http://www.theautoshop.com/timing.html
> Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
> https://www.mixmaster.it

Signature
Joseph Meehan
Dia 's Muire duit
The only flaw is the idiot not changing the belt on time. LOL
> Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
> https://www.mixmaster.it
Matt B. - 14 May 2008 04:52 GMT
> The only flaw is the idiot not changing the belt on time. LOL
x2. Due to diesel's high compression ratios, I'd be surprised if any diesel
engine out there was non-interference if the belt breaks.
none2u - 14 May 2008 14:10 GMT
>> The only flaw is the idiot not changing the belt on time. LOL
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>customers and diming them to VW to void warranties later. Just bad service
>in general. I didn't want to rant today. So Bye.
Chicago Paddling-Fishing - 14 May 2008 21:59 GMT
>The only flaw is the idiot not changing the belt on time. LOL
Unfortunately, that's not true... My GTI was fine, but on my Porsche, roughly
3k miles before the 60k interval, the belt broke. We had been thru a series
of bad belts where they kept replacing the belt at the adjustment time (either
the 2k or 15k interval), and they thought this belt was good, but it wasn't as
good as thought...
Now days I'm a belt wussie and I have it checked every 10k miles instead of
using 15k intervals as it was a very expensive repair...
I don't let it get close anymore...

Signature
John Nelson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page
http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org
(A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell)
Joseph Meehan - 14 May 2008 23:37 GMT
I would not put much faith into that visual check. Timing belts
generally look like new the day before they break.
>>The only flaw is the idiot not changing the belt on time. LOL
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> I don't let it get close anymore...

Signature
Joseph Meehan
Dia 's Muire duit
Lost In Space/Woodchuck - 15 May 2008 22:38 GMT
yep
> I would not put much faith into that visual check. Timing belts
> generally look like new the day before they break.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>>
>> I don't let it get close anymore...
Chicago Paddling-Fishing - 02 Jun 2008 08:49 GMT
> I would not put much faith into that visual check. Timing belts
>generally look like new the day before they break.
Well, in every case when they were replacing what they felt were bad belts
they were fraying before hitting 2k miles (I think they replaced 1 at the
15k mark but most were 2k and out).

Signature
John Nelson
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page
http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org
(A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell)
dave AKA vwdoc1 - 02 Jun 2008 19:56 GMT
I noticed that too with only the interference engines, new looking then
snap! Well maybe the early diesels would show signs of wear (cracking) on
the outside. I have not had to repair a diesel engine with a snapped belt.
;-)
Not sure about the TDIs, but I would also change their belts after XXK miles
The 16V timing belts should be changed at 40K miles IMHO. They may look
great and then snap. Only twice have I changed them and there was no engine
damage.
I have not seen many new looking 8V gas timing belts that just snap. Well
there was one that lost some of it's teeth, but it was getting up there in
mileage, like 160,000 miles. 8^)

Signature
later,
dave
(One out of many daves)
>> I would not put much faith into that visual check. Timing belts
>>generally look like new the day before they break.
>
> Well, in every case when they were replacing what they felt were bad belts
> they were fraying before hitting 2k miles (I think they replaced 1 at the
> 15k mark but most were 2k and out).
laura halliday - 05 Jun 2008 22:08 GMT
My 1986 Jetta was a non-interference engine, but I was always
religious belt inspection/replacement.
The Jetta's replacement is a (non-VW - sorry!) diesel, and
requires the usual religious checks and replacements. One
saving grace is that while the Mitsubishi 4D56T (a '92 L300
Delica, in this case) is very much an interference engine,
the valves are vertical in the head, and the usual consequence
of a broken timing belt is broken rocker arms. No bent valves
or anything.
Laura Halliday VE7LDH "Non sequitur. Your ACKS are
Grid: CN89mg uncoordinated."
ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - Nomad the Network Engineer
> Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
> https://www.mixmaster.it
Well...
There is a truism in about any industry: You can have it cheap, you
can have it good, you can have it fast. Pick any two.
In the case of diesel engines - inherently more expensive than
equivalent-displacement gasoline engines - the choice is only between
cheap and good. Mercedes uses chains, even in their present generation
of TDI engines. They ain't nohow cheap either. Most other larger
diesels use chains or gears. Not all, however.
VW uses belts. That cuts a *BIG CHUNK* out of the cost of the engine -
short-run savings. And a big chunk out of the weight of the engine -
long-run savings. You, the owner, are required to subsidize those
savings by paying for belt replacements at regular and specified
intervals - and keeping a record of said changes for warranty
purposes. You got it cheap, so qwitcherbitchin and suck it up.
VW has a fatal flaw - If the oil is never changed or checked, their
engines sieze. They need to design an engine that does not require
oil...
GAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
Craig - 16 May 2008 12:08 GMT
Even a chain is not a guarantee. I worked at an MB dealer for 7 years &
changed PLENTY of chains & chain guides on diesels because they were worn
out & in danger of breaking. It was a gravy job though if you just needed to
change the chain.
On May 13, 8:45 pm, George Orwell <nob...@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
> https://www.mixmaster.it
Well...
There is a truism in about any industry: You can have it cheap, you
can have it good, you can have it fast. Pick any two.
In the case of diesel engines - inherently more expensive than
equivalent-displacement gasoline engines - the choice is only between
cheap and good. Mercedes uses chains, even in their present generation
of TDI engines. They ain't nohow cheap either. Most other larger
diesels use chains or gears. Not all, however.
VW uses belts. That cuts a *BIG CHUNK* out of the cost of the engine -
short-run savings. And a big chunk out of the weight of the engine -
long-run savings. You, the owner, are required to subsidize those
savings by paying for belt replacements at regular and specified
intervals - and keeping a record of said changes for warranty
purposes. You got it cheap, so qwitcherbitchin and suck it up.
VW has a fatal flaw - If the oil is never changed or checked, their
engines sieze. They need to design an engine that does not require
oil...
GAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!
Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
> Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
> https://www.mixmaster.it
A flaw in many modern high HP engines, which is a terrible problem if
they are of the interference type. Inadequate maintenance leads to
inadequate engine life.
What does the next chapter of your Cars for Dummies say?
Sean - 01 Jun 2008 05:26 GMT
>> Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
>>
> A flaw in many modern high HP engines, which is a terrible problem if
> they are of the interference type. Inadequate maintenance leads to
> inadequate engine life.
So, since the spark timing is all computerized, why isn't the valve timing?
Why can't they use spring-return solenoids and eliminate the whole mess?
...Sean.
Jim Behning - 01 Jun 2008 10:46 GMT
>>> Timing belt. When it skips or breaks your engine's toast.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>...Sean.
Cost.