Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: REJECTING CAR as NOT of SATISFACTORY QUALITY?

Willy23 Oct 2006 08:42
> Not to put too fine a point on it but that is complete and utter rubbish.
> Audi almost certainly have an in house legal team that could deal with it
> for a fraction of the cost you suggest.

agreed

> The OP would
> have to take action in the High Court and employ a solicitor who would
> probably instruct a barrister just to get the action started.

Why the HC?

Peter Crosland17 Oct 2006 14:15
>> Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
>> "Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Going to court will almost certainly be more than you're asking them
> to pay. Doing this the Right Way is the best course of action.

Not to put too fine a point on it but that is complete and utter rubbish.
Audi almost certainly have an in house legal team that could deal with it
for a fraction of the cost you suggest. Even if they did not any high street
solicitor would be able to advise them for a tenth of that. The OP would
have to take action in the High Court and employ a solicitor who would
probably instruct a barrister just to get the action started. That is always
assuming the OP can find a solicitor to take the case on which is doubtful.

Peter Crosland

Av15 Oct 2006 00:24
> Hello
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle -
> copy of letter below.

[snip]

You almost certainly will want to retain a lawyer / soliciter and have
them send the letters and do all the communication through.
It will cost you, but you have a much higher chance of success.

For their legal department to simply *respond* to your lawyer will cost
upwards of UKP2500 I imagine, in time and resources.
Going to court will almost certainly be more than you're asking them to
pay. Doing this the Right Way is the best course of action.

mike1c@easy.com14 Oct 2006 16:53
Hello

Whilst I was really looking forward to being an Audi owner, the
"Vorsprung Durch Technik" expectation was never fulfilled and I now
find myself in the position of contacting the heads of Audi and the
dealer (with whom the contract of sale is with) to reject the vehicle -
copy of letter below.

The vehicle is approx 2.5 years old and has done 50,000 miles. I have
owned from new. From what I understand my "rejection" is pretty
exceptional, but do you think legally I have any chance of success?
Whilst a full refund would be fantastic, I am realistic and don't
really expect as I've had benefit from the vehicle (although not 100%
what I was expecting). What kind of compensation do you think is
realistic or should I expect Audi/the dealer to just refer to the
warranty that has covered the cost of fixing these problems?

Thanks for your thoughts!
MC

"Dear Sirs

After great deliberation and due diligence, I purchased an A4 Cabriolet
2.4 Sport Multitronic because of Audi's claim for quality, technical
perfection and safety. Unfortunately after spending in excess of
£29,000 my A4 Cabriolet experience has not been as described.

With lost confidence in the car's reliability and safety, plus a
catalogue of continuing problems (some of which took more than 6 months
for Audi to acknowledge), I must now claim my rights under the Sale of
Goods Act 1979.

Owning an A4 Cabriolet that is not of `satisfactory quality' or `fit
for purpose' has been a terrible and extremely stressful experience and
I now request refund compensation within 7 days.

A4 Cabriolet 2.4 Sport Multitronic
Chassis Number: removed
Registration: removed

- Steering Column Replaced
- Power Steering Reservoir Replaced
- Multitronic Gearbox Replaced
- Storage Hood Replaced
- Leaking Door Seal Repaired
- Air Conditioning Faulty
- Acoustic Parking System "Blind Spot" Faulty
- Airbag Wiring Replaced
- Automatic Hood Frame Fixings Replaced
- Peeling Audi Badge Replaced
- Windscreen Frame Faulty
- Ignition Coil Replaced

My telephone number is included and your prompt response in this matter
is appreciated.

Yours Sincerely"

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.