Re: headlights on all day
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: headlights on all day
| Fred W | 02 Oct 2006 00:54 |
> Yup, GM likes to equip Saturns with them. Fortunately a few new BMW's > have "angle eyes" DRLs. I assume this is mostly due to Audi's successful > LED DRLs. "Angle" (sic) eyes are not DRLs. I suppose that they they take the place of "city lights" in those obscure European places that still require such, but they are most certainly NOT DRLs.
DRLs are *supposed* to be obnoxious. If they aren't getting your attention, they aren't doing what they are intended to do...
 Signature -Fred W
|
| Ulf | 30 Sep 2006 22:39 |
>>> I don't get how BMW can be stupid enough to use the high beams as DRLs. >>> Turn signals, fog lights or low beams at a reduced voltage would have [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > The best option is a set of lights specifically designed to be used as > running lights, i.e., with the appropriate intensity and beam pattern. Exactly.
>> One: They are more apt to get the attention of other drivers as they >> are fairly bright, even at reduced intensity. > > Yes, they are fairly bright, and annoyingly distractive in my rear view > mirror. I don't consider either of those attributes to be a feature. They're more than fairly bright, they're way too bright to be used as DRLs.
>> Two: If you burn one of >> them out (due to them being constantly on) you will not lose any of the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > If I remember correctly, GM made the same foolish engineering decision > regarding running lights. I thought BMW knew better.... Yup, GM likes to equip Saturns with them. Fortunately a few new BMW's have "angle eyes" DRLs. I assume this is mostly due to Audi's successful LED DRLs.
Ulf
|
| bjn | 30 Sep 2006 14:12 |
>> I don't get how BMW can be stupid enough to use the high beams as DRLs. >> Turn signals, fog lights or low beams at a reduced voltage would have >> been much better... > >Actually, no. The high beams at reduced intensity are the best option >for two reasons. The best option is a set of lights specifically designed to be used as running lights, i.e., with the appropriate intensity and beam pattern.
>One: They are more apt to get the attention of other drivers as they >are fairly bright, even at reduced intensity. Yes, they are fairly bright, and annoyingly distractive in my rear view mirror. I don't consider either of those attributes to be a feature.
>Two: If you burn one of >them out (due to them being constantly on) you will not lose any of the >more important light functions: This is not a justification to use the high beams as running lights, this is a reason to have a separate set of running lights.
If I remember correctly, GM made the same foolish engineering decision regarding running lights. I thought BMW knew better....
|
| Fred W | 28 Sep 2006 14:04 |
> I don't get how BMW can be stupid enough to use the high beams as DRLs. > Turn signals, fog lights or low beams at a reduced voltage would have > been much better... Actually, no. The high beams at reduced intensity are the best option for two reasons.
One: They are more apt to get the attention of other drivers as they are fairly bright, even at reduced intensity. Two: If you burn one of them out (due to them being constantly on) you will not lose any of the more important light functions: signalling turns, or low beams. Don't forget, not all cars come equiped with fog lights. Having fog lights where I live is completely unnecesary as we seldom get real fog.
 Signature -Fred W
|
| Ulf | 25 Sep 2006 17:51 |
>> i have a 325is 95 and the high beams on on as soon as i turn on my car >> .. they are quite a bit dimmer then if i turn on my lights .. i know [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > This link should help you locate the module to remove. > http://www.unofficialbmw.com/e36/electrical/e36_daytime_running_lights.html I don't get how BMW can be stupid enough to use the high beams as DRLs. Turn signals, fog lights or low beams at a reduced voltage would have been much better...
Ulf
|
| Fred W | 25 Sep 2006 15:00 |
> i have a 325is 95 and the high beams on on as soon as i turn on my car > .. they are quite a bit dimmer then if i turn on my lights .. i know > there suposed to be like that but i want to know how make them not come > on untill i want them to. That is called "Daytime Running Lights" or DRLs for short.
This link should help you locate the module to remove. http://www.unofficialbmw.com/e36/electrical/e36_daytime_running_lights.html
 Signature -Fred W
|
| Kriznaft | 25 Sep 2006 01:03 |
i have a 325is 95 and the high beams on on as soon as i turn on my car .. they are quite a bit dimmer then if i turn on my lights .. i know there suposed to be like that but i want to know how make them not come on untill i want them to.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|