>> I don't get how BMW can be stupid enough to use the high beams as DRLs. >> Turn signals, fog lights or low beams at a reduced voltage would have >> been much better... > >Actually, no. The high beams at reduced intensity are the best option >for two reasons. The best option is a set of lights specifically designed to be used as running lights, i.e., with the appropriate intensity and beam pattern.
>One: They are more apt to get the attention of other drivers as they >are fairly bright, even at reduced intensity. Yes, they are fairly bright, and annoyingly distractive in my rear view mirror. I don't consider either of those attributes to be a feature.
>Two: If you burn one of >them out (due to them being constantly on) you will not lose any of the >more important light functions: This is not a justification to use the high beams as running lights, this is a reason to have a separate set of running lights.
If I remember correctly, GM made the same foolish engineering decision regarding running lights. I thought BMW knew better....
|