You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: REMOTE CAR STARTERS
| Jeff Strickland | 27 Oct 2006 00:02 |
The decision to drive or let it sit is driven by the cost of fuel.
Why let a car sit and run at 1500 rpm for several minutes when one can use the same rpm's to get out of the neighborhood and half way to the freeway?
The idea that one MUST let a car sit is an old wive's tale. A car rolling down the street taching along at 1500 is getting the same wear and tear as the one sitting motionless in the driveway at the same tach reading.
The advantage of remote starting is that the car's heater can be switched on when one exits the vehicle, then with remote start the heater comes on and warms the cabin while you have toast and coffee.
>I recently heard a discussion on remote car starters. One view is that > when a car is started in cold weather, it should be driven within a > minute or so. The opposing view is that you should let it sit for 5 > minutes to warm up. Any views/insights out there? |
| alg | 26 Oct 2006 21:27 |
I recently heard a discussion on remote car starters. One view is that when a car is started in cold weather, it should be driven within a minute or so. The opposing view is that you should let it sit for 5 minutes to warm up. Any views/insights out there?
|
Quick links: