Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: K&N Panel Air Filter - better performance?

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: K&N Panel Air Filter - better performance?

admin24 Oct 2007 19:55
> The deformed seal argument is BS.  Their seals are just as good or
> better than the OE filter seals.  They do not deform when they get hot.
>  Those guys are on crack.

If so - so am I. I've had the K&N seal deform on a BMW motorcycle. The
filter seal was too big, when the airbox was clamped closed the seal
extruded from the seal area.

> The rest of the K&N "claims" is also BS.  You will get no improvement in
> horsepower or mileage.  You will get a filter that you have to clean and
> reinstall rather than just replace.

Fred W23 Oct 2007 22:21
>>Just wondering if replacing the stock filter with the above would noticeably
>>improve performance or sound.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I'm skipping them and staying with the standard OEM type filters in my
> 530.

The deformed seal argument is BS.  Their seals are just as good or
better than the OE filter seals.  They do not deform when they get hot.
 Those guys are on crack.

The rest of the K&N "claims" is also BS.  You will get no improvement in
horsepower or mileage.  You will get a filter that you have to clean and
reinstall rather than just replace.

Signature

-Fred W


Karl Winkler22 Oct 2007 19:58
> Just wondering if replacing the stock filter with the above would noticeably
> improve performance or sound.
>
> Any comments?

I realize this is an old thread but as it happens, I was discussing
this very thing with my mechanic today. I've read about these filters
on the forums and was curious. The people backing K&N claim a 3-4 MPG
gain in normal driving, and a HP or two gain in more spirited driving.
I was also intrigued by the "clean & re-use" aspect of these filters.

My mechanic (Wittler Auto here in Albuquerque) told me that in theory,
these filters might be a good idea, but actually, they have a fairly
serious drawback. The seal is made of a silicone material, and
according to the Wittler, they've seen lots of these filters with
deformed seals. Seems that the seals deform when they get hot, i.e.
the silicone gets too soft. Thus, when the seal is deformed,
unfiltered air gets through to the engine. Thus, they aren't too fond
of these things. He did say that *if they were made better* they might
be OK. But, they would cost a lot more, too. So, for the time being,
I'm skipping them and staying with the standard OEM type filters in my
530.

Karl Winkler
http://www.sandiastrings.com

Hurst23 Sep 2007 18:42
Just wondering if replacing the stock filter with the above would noticeably
improve performance or sound.

Any comments?

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.