Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Alternative LED bulbs - ECU confusion?

DCA19 Oct 2007 12:13
>  
>>>> As for E marking - the lack of it doesn't mean they don't comply, it
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>  
I disagree - they appear better top me which is why I want to try them
Rear of lorries/motorcycles/school & public buses have them now too.
The E number is not of concern to me - but obviously poor functionality
is of concern. E numbers mean the bulb manufacturer has gone through an
expensive type approval routine. Non-E number means its compliance
cannot be verified NOT that it does not comply with requirements!

Dave Plowman (News)16 Oct 2007 22:46
> >> As for E marking - the lack of it doesn't mean they don't comply, it
> >> merely means they haven't been type approved.
> >
> > Which means that they are illegal to use on the road.

> Well not in the UK, which has [eventually] modified construction and use
> regulation to allow LED lights, but to certain criteria.

It allows purpose designed E marked LED lamp units - which is a *very*
different matter from using LED replacement bulbs in units designed for
filament types. Replacement bulbs for those must be E marked too - and
none of the LED ones are, for a very good reason. And that reason is they
are dangerous. Just to emphasise the points again they are either bright
enough when viewed straight on but useless to the side - one type - or dim
all round - the other type.

Oh - FWIW, the custom designed LED indictor units fitted to current VW
cars are not as bright viewed from directly behind as filament types and
considerably inferior to the sides. So could present a totally unnecessary
hazard in bright sunlight - all in the name of fashion.

Signature

*There's two theories to arguing with a woman. Neither one works *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.


R. Mark Clayton16 Oct 2007 17:52
>> As for E marking - the lack of it doesn't mean they don't comply, it
>> merely means they haven't been type approved.
>
> Which means that they are illegal to use on the road.

Well not in the UK, which has [eventually] modified construction and use
regulation to allow LED lights, but to certain criteria.

A good example of UK civil service jobsworthiness is reflective number
plates: -

These were shown on Tomorrow's World about 40 years ago.

DoT (as it then was) rejected them out of hand and drivers who fitted them
prematurely were prosecuted.

OTOH Ireland was an early adopter.

Finally the UK went over to them and only cars pre 1973 could have non
reflective plates made.

Now they are obligatory, not only that if your [cherished] plate is to be
fitted to a post 2000 car, then you have to have new ones made with the BS
mark, although I suppose if they were compliant with BS you could post fix
the mark (see another thread).

RustY©15 Oct 2007 19:48
> As for E marking - the lack of it doesn't mean they don't comply, it
> merely means they haven't been type approved.

Which means that they are illegal to use on the road.

DCA15 Oct 2007 13:41
>  
>> Take a look and tell me what you think - these seem pretty well designed
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>  
You're probably right but these ones have high intensity pointing to the
rear with side clusters for the reflectors
They *may* be very good and I think I will give it a go with front
indicators first
As for E marking - the lack of it doesn't mean they don't comply, it
merely means they haven't been type approved. This could be due to tyhe
fact that it costs  so much to achieve these markings. It's rather like
saying that someone who has passed a driving test is a better driver
than someone who hasn't - which of course is not necessarily true (just
that passing proves it!).
Worth a try for £5

Dave Plowman (News)15 Oct 2007 08:43
> Take a look and tell me what you think - these seem pretty well designed
> to widen the viewing angle:
> http://www.virtualvillage.co.uk/Items/002510-030?

These simply don't produce the same light levels as a 21 watt indicator
bulb in the normal reflector.

Euro car lighting parts must be 'E' marked to conform with those regs. And
non of these replacements are - simply because they can't produce the
correct spread of light at an intensity to replace a 21 watt filament
type. The other type of LED replacement with 5mm leds 'firing' forward do
just about produce the same intensity - but only over a very narrow angle.

For safety lights like indicators etc where a wide viewing angle is
required these things are positively dangerous - they can't be seen in
bright daylight.

Signature

*Why is the man who invests all your money called a broker? *

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.


DCA15 Oct 2007 08:07
>  
>> Can anyone advise me if fitting after market LED bulbs in indicators,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>  
Take a look and tell me what you think - these seem pretty well designed
to widen the viewing angle:
http://www.virtualvillage.co.uk/Items/002510-030?

Dave Plowman (News)14 Oct 2007 23:44
> Can anyone advise me if fitting after market LED bulbs in indicators,
> side adn brake lights confuse the onboard computer?
> I prefer the more responsive light they offer but don't want the car
> dinging me about dead bulbs!

For a start there are no direct replacement LEDs for units designed for
tungsten - the optics on these lights is optimised for a point source
filament. And for things like indictors this is a very real problem in
sunlight etc - the LED replacements simply won't be as bright, or have the
same viewing angle. And it's not just a slight difference either. There
are currently no LED replacements that meet the specifications required by
law in Europe. Completely new lamp units designed from the start for LEDs
are a different matter.

They will also confuse the failed bulb warning system.

Signature

*Why is it that rain drops but snow falls?

   Dave Plowman        dave@davenoise.co.uk           London SW
                 To e-mail, change noise into sound.


DCA14 Oct 2007 20:49
Can anyone advise me if fitting after market LED bulbs in indicators,
side adn brake lights confuse the onboard computer?
I prefer the more responsive light they offer but don't want the car
dinging me about dead bulbs!

I've a 2001 E39

Thanks
David

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.