Re: Alpine CDA-9813, Eclipse 3413, Clarion ProAudio DXZ835MP - Which HU Should I get?
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Alpine CDA-9813, Eclipse 3413, Clarion ProAudio DXZ835MP - Which HU Should I get?
| Steve Grauman | 03 Dec 2003 06:49 |
Clarion quickly made my list of products not to buy after knowing someone who needed to exchange their deck twice under warranty before getting one that worked properly. And even then, I was un-impressed by it's sound quality. Nakamichi, Sony, Aiwa, and Panasonic are on the list as well, although the Nak units do sound quite nice. As far as bang for the buck goes in terms of the price:features ratio, I think Blaupunkt and Pioneer have the market beat. And, IMHO, Alpine and Eclipse own the SQ arena. Although I think the Nak units offer a damn good sound, and I hear that McIntosh's deck is quite nice as well, although I've never heard it before.
|
| Paul Vina | 03 Dec 2003 04:03 |
I stopped liking them after they went to that stupid secong version of the Alpha-touch volume with the ball instead of the little pyramid. They were absolute garbage for about 6 years after that.
Paul Vina
> "Paul Vina" <paulvina@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Er6zb.282778 > > Am I the only one who still likes Clarion, sure after the 9375 they haven't > been the same but there far from horrible, just not as good. They still put > a whole lot of stuff in a deck, for better or worse. |
| Tha Ghee | 02 Dec 2003 22:34 |
"Paul Vina" <paulvina@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Er6zb.282778
Am I the only one who still likes Clarion, sure after the 9375 they haven't been the same but there far from horrible, just not as good. They still put a whole lot of stuff in a deck, for better or worse.
|
| Paul Vina | 02 Dec 2003 20:17 |
The cheapest I've seen it from an Authorized dealer is $399. Even with my ex-employee discount I would only save $30 or off of retail. There is no margin in Alpine electronics. Their speakers are another matter entirely though.
Paul Vina
> Not sure if the B+ lead goes to the battery or not... > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > > > Paul Vina |
| Mike | 02 Dec 2003 18:55 |
Not sure if the B+ lead goes to the battery or not...
I've heard that etronics is not an "authorized" Alpine distributor. Would you be concerned about that given that the warranties are only 1 year anyway and that they are well built machines? I can get the 9813 for $285 from Etronics...Though, I'd consider spending a couple more dollars to get the warranty, though, if it's much more I'll have to drop down to the 9811 because it'll go past what I'm willing to spend. Anyone know of a cheap place to get Alpine from an authorized dealer?
Thanks. Mike
> > Hey Paul, when you hooked up your 9815, did you hook it directly up to > > your car battery? What's up with that? I read on another thread that [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Paul Vina |
| Paul Vina | 30 Nov 2003 06:55 |
> Hey Paul, when you hooked up your 9815, did you hook it directly up to > your car battery? What's up with that? I read on another thread that > that's how it was supposed to be connected, but others said that > wasn't necessarily true. It's marketing. If that HU amp really put out enough power to justify a 10ga. power kit than it wouldn't fit a HU to begin with. I have never, and will never, wire an Alpine to the battry with a 10ga. kit. Besides, the factory B+ lead goes to the battery as well, doesn't it? Hmmmm.
Paul Vina
|
| Mike | 30 Nov 2003 05:44 |
*laughs* Ya know, I was actually counting the buttons on the different units. I'd really prefer it have MORE buttons than less. Should give me more access to things without looking. I don't mind complex. It keeps people from messing with my settings! Plus, I like a good challenge.
I'm really most interested in MP3 capabilities and the display, but I want it to sound good, of course.
The Eclipse 3413 does come with MP3 capabilities, though I haven't figured out if it will read ID3 tags, which would be a big issue if it doesn't. Also, I like the fact that the Alpine will play Play Lists and you can search for artists, etc. Pretty nice features, really. A friend at work has an Alpine that he got a couple of years ago and it only shows directory numbers and song numbers instead of text.
Hey Paul, when you hooked up your 9815, did you hook it directly up to your car battery? What's up with that? I read on another thread that that's how it was supposed to be connected, but others said that wasn't necessarily true.
Thanks.
> I agre with Steve, Eclipse's user interface is a lot simpler on the 55430 I > had but I haven't used either of the new units with DSP so I can't say how [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I > > love my Eclipse deck. |
| Paul Vina | 29 Nov 2003 21:13 |
I agre with Steve, Eclipse's user interface is a lot simpler on the 55430 I had but I haven't used either of the new units with DSP so I can't say how easy they are to use. After having my 9815 for a coupl eof weeks it's gotten a LOT easier to use, not nearly as unintuitive as I first thought. Also, most of the Eclipse units will require the purchase and installation of the Commander unit to play back MP3s. If that's a big thing for you look at the Alpine a bit more.
Paul Vina
> I agree with Paul on most of his points. Clarion's HU have been going downhill > in the quality dept. sine the early 1990s, Alpine and Eclipse both offer > superior sound quality to the Clarion, and sound approx. the same as each > other. I personally couldn't get into the Alpine decks only because I didn't > like their user interface. Pick whichever of the two you like using more, I > love my Eclipse deck. |
| Steve Grauman | 29 Nov 2003 20:35 |
I agree with Paul on most of his points. Clarion's HU have been going downhill in the quality dept. sine the early 1990s, Alpine and Eclipse both offer superior sound quality to the Clarion, and sound approx. the same as each other. I personally couldn't get into the Alpine decks only because I didn't like their user interface. Pick whichever of the two you like using more, I love my Eclipse deck.
|
| Paul Vina | 28 Nov 2003 20:56 |
I'd go with Alpine. I haven't felt Clarion made a solid HU since the original ProAudio heads in 92 and 93 (like my old 6770) no matter how many bells and whistles they put in them. My wife and I both have the 9815 (almost identical to the 9813) and I couldn't recommend them more. The Eclipse IMO does not sound any better then the Alpine (I had a 55430) so go for the Alpine.
Paul Vina
> Hey everyone. I'm trying to decide which deck to put in my car to > replace my stock HU [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Thanks for the thoughts. |
| Mike | 28 Nov 2003 19:41 |
Hey everyone. I'm trying to decide which deck to put in my car to replace my stock HU
Primary wants: *MP3 capability with ID3 translation.
*Decent/Large Display for viewing Text.
*Good sound quality, but not willing to pay for super-high end. I'd like to stay around $300 or so.
*Ideally the unit will utilize Play Lists and random-play sub folders.
*I may very well add a sub or replace stock speakers and add amps, etc, so that flexibility would be nice, but not a priority. I'd prefer it to sound solid as it is without needing to add amps.
Right now I'm leaning towards the Alpine, but the feature set of the Clarion is making me hesitate. I understand that Eclipse makes great decks, but, I think I'll be dissapointed in the feature set just to get a little bit better sound quality, if any.
Thanks for the thoughts.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|