Re: Alpine CDA-9813, Eclipse 3413, Clarion ProAudio DXZ835MP - Which HU Should I get?
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Alpine CDA-9813, Eclipse 3413, Clarion ProAudio DXZ835MP - Which HU Should I get?
| Paul Vina | 04 Dec 2003 20:13 |
I'd still go with the Alpine. As bad as everyone says the control interface is the only functions that are buried are the ones you shouldn't be adjusting while driving anyway like the time correction and the crossover. All of the day to day stuff is VERY easy to use. And don't discount the Bass Engine Pro functions. You'd be surprised how much less eq a system needs when there aren't as many phase issues.
Paul Vina
> *laughs* Yeah, that definitely answers my question. You've put your > money where your mouth is! :) [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > > > > > > > Paul Vina |
| Mike | 04 Dec 2003 14:06 |
*laughs* Yeah, that definitely answers my question. You've put your money where your mouth is! :)
For all practical purposes, the Alpine 9813 and Eclipse 3413 are basically the same price, the difference being that the Eclipse would be purchased with a warranty the Alpine without.
Obviously as you look at the two the Alpine has more features than the Eclipse. Much larger display, Bass Pro system, etc. But, most people say that the Eclipse has better sound quality and an easier to use user interface. The Alpine also comes with a remote, though I'd ultimately be using a PAC-SWI so I'd only need the remote to program the the PAC-SWI...
Thanks so much for your thoughts. Mike
PS: Not sure why I never saw the other posts you guys made 2 days ago, though I can see them now!
> This should answer your question, I bought 2 9815s from Indo Audio on eBay > from my car and my wife's cars. :) I don't remember the last time I saw a [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > > > > > Paul Vina |
| Paul Vina | 04 Dec 2003 04:00 |
This should answer your question, I bought 2 9815s from Indo Audio on eBay from my car and my wife's cars. :) I don't remember the last time I saw a bad Alpine out of the box.
Paul Vina
> Hey Paul. I thought I responded to this the other day, but my message > never posted. :( [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > > > Paul Vina |
| Mike | 04 Dec 2003 00:57 |
Hey Paul. I thought I responded to this the other day, but my message never posted. :(
Anyway, I have a follow-up question for you. Given that Alpine makes such good decks was the warranty important to you at all? I ask because I found the 9813 for $285 from Etronics, but apparently they aren't an "authorized" dealer and therefore the warranty would be void...I'm just wondering how much I should care about that given how good Alpine HUs are.
Also, anyone know of a place that is an authorized Alpine dealer that sells them for less than retail?
Thanks!
> > Hey Paul, when you hooked up your 9815, did you hook it directly up to > > your car battery? What's up with that? I read on another thread that [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Paul Vina |
| Paul Vina | 30 Nov 2003 06:55 |
> Hey Paul, when you hooked up your 9815, did you hook it directly up to > your car battery? What's up with that? I read on another thread that > that's how it was supposed to be connected, but others said that > wasn't necessarily true. It's marketing. If that HU amp really put out enough power to justify a 10ga. power kit than it wouldn't fit a HU to begin with. I have never, and will never, wire an Alpine to the battry with a 10ga. kit. Besides, the factory B+ lead goes to the battery as well, doesn't it? Hmmmm.
Paul Vina
|
| Mike | 30 Nov 2003 05:44 |
*laughs* Ya know, I was actually counting the buttons on the different units. I'd really prefer it have MORE buttons than less. Should give me more access to things without looking. I don't mind complex. It keeps people from messing with my settings! Plus, I like a good challenge.
I'm really most interested in MP3 capabilities and the display, but I want it to sound good, of course.
The Eclipse 3413 does come with MP3 capabilities, though I haven't figured out if it will read ID3 tags, which would be a big issue if it doesn't. Also, I like the fact that the Alpine will play Play Lists and you can search for artists, etc. Pretty nice features, really. A friend at work has an Alpine that he got a couple of years ago and it only shows directory numbers and song numbers instead of text.
Hey Paul, when you hooked up your 9815, did you hook it directly up to your car battery? What's up with that? I read on another thread that that's how it was supposed to be connected, but others said that wasn't necessarily true.
Thanks.
> I agre with Steve, Eclipse's user interface is a lot simpler on the 55430 I > had but I haven't used either of the new units with DSP so I can't say how [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I > > love my Eclipse deck. |
| Paul Vina | 29 Nov 2003 21:13 |
I agre with Steve, Eclipse's user interface is a lot simpler on the 55430 I had but I haven't used either of the new units with DSP so I can't say how easy they are to use. After having my 9815 for a coupl eof weeks it's gotten a LOT easier to use, not nearly as unintuitive as I first thought. Also, most of the Eclipse units will require the purchase and installation of the Commander unit to play back MP3s. If that's a big thing for you look at the Alpine a bit more.
Paul Vina
> I agree with Paul on most of his points. Clarion's HU have been going downhill > in the quality dept. sine the early 1990s, Alpine and Eclipse both offer > superior sound quality to the Clarion, and sound approx. the same as each > other. I personally couldn't get into the Alpine decks only because I didn't > like their user interface. Pick whichever of the two you like using more, I > love my Eclipse deck. |
| Steve Grauman | 29 Nov 2003 20:35 |
I agree with Paul on most of his points. Clarion's HU have been going downhill in the quality dept. sine the early 1990s, Alpine and Eclipse both offer superior sound quality to the Clarion, and sound approx. the same as each other. I personally couldn't get into the Alpine decks only because I didn't like their user interface. Pick whichever of the two you like using more, I love my Eclipse deck.
|
| Paul Vina | 28 Nov 2003 20:56 |
I'd go with Alpine. I haven't felt Clarion made a solid HU since the original ProAudio heads in 92 and 93 (like my old 6770) no matter how many bells and whistles they put in them. My wife and I both have the 9815 (almost identical to the 9813) and I couldn't recommend them more. The Eclipse IMO does not sound any better then the Alpine (I had a 55430) so go for the Alpine.
Paul Vina
> Hey everyone. I'm trying to decide which deck to put in my car to > replace my stock HU [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Thanks for the thoughts. |
| Mike | 28 Nov 2003 19:41 |
Hey everyone. I'm trying to decide which deck to put in my car to replace my stock HU
Primary wants: *MP3 capability with ID3 translation.
*Decent/Large Display for viewing Text.
*Good sound quality, but not willing to pay for super-high end. I'd like to stay around $300 or so.
*Ideally the unit will utilize Play Lists and random-play sub folders.
*I may very well add a sub or replace stock speakers and add amps, etc, so that flexibility would be nice, but not a priority. I'd prefer it to sound solid as it is without needing to add amps.
Right now I'm leaning towards the Alpine, but the feature set of the Clarion is making me hesitate. I understand that Eclipse makes great decks, but, I think I'll be dissapointed in the feature set just to get a little bit better sound quality, if any.
Thanks for the thoughts.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|