Re: 85 MPH speedometers

You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: 85 MPH speedometers

Sir Ray

31 May 2006 15:56

> > Seeing as there are roads with 70 MPH speed limits within a few hours'
> > drive from my house, how would I be able to tell whether or not I was
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> have no idea how fast you are going. :) Oh, and speed limits below 35MPH
> are rarely (like, almost never) enforced. -Dave

I think speedometers are pretty useless, since quite frankly most sane
people drive the speed they are comfortable for road and weather
conditions (the one usenet troll this is geared to will invariable fair
to understand that). Ideally, lose all speed limits, lose the
speedometers, lose the false science and ad-hoc revenue generation,
clearly mark areas where caution is required (and hey, if there are
inherent dangers, use zig-zag road markings or rumble strips or some
equivalent as approipiate - but no freaking traffic blocking...I mean
traffic 'calming' ), and use the space on the dashboard for larger turn
signal indicators (so the ol' and not so ol' folks won't be driving
2km signalling for a turn).
Cops could still give out their tickets for reckless driving, and
'agressive driving' wouldn't be a crock offense based on speed + one
other offense, but would actually mean something (like weaving in and
out without signalling and tailgating agressively whenever they can't
weave). And instead of wasting time hiding in speed traps, cops could
actually patrol for real safety violations and... Eh, we all know this
already (except for one troll, who refuses to accept reality).
"Speed kills nobody, Stupidity kills millions"

Mike T.

31 May 2006 15:24

> Seeing as there are roads with 70 MPH speed limits within a few hours'
> drive from my house, how would I be able to tell whether or not I was
> speeding?
>
> nate

Hey, I think you've got something there. I say all speedometers should read
25MPH, maximum. Then you would have an iron-clad defense against roadside
tax collection activity. You can't be charged for defective equipment if
the factory installed it. You can't be charged for speeding if you honestly
have no idea how fast you are going. :) Oh, and speed limits below 35MPH
are rarely (like, almost never) enforced. -Dave

N8N

31 May 2006 15:10

> >In the late 70s and 80s, most (all?) cars had speedometers that would only
> >go up to 85. Were they mandated by the government? What year did they come
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the victim's family will sue GM for selling cars that encourage
> speeding.

Seeing as there are roads with 70 MPH speed limits within a few hours'
drive from my house, how would I be able to tell whether or not I was
speeding?

nate

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE

31 May 2006 15:08

>In the late 70s and 80s, most (all?) cars had speedometers that would only
>go up to 85. Were they mandated by the government? What year did they come
>out? Why 85? At the time the maximum speed limit was 55.

It's insane that they read anything over 60. Someday GM is gonna get
sued over this. Somebody will get killed by a speeder doing 80 and
the victim's family will sue GM for selling cars that encourage
speeding.

Ronnie Dobbs	31 May 2006 10:26
In the late 70s and 80s, most (all?) cars had speedometers that would only go up to 85. Were they mandated by the government? What year did they come out? Why 85? At the time the maximum speed limit was 55.

Quick links: