Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: GM Shifts to Manual Transmissions for Global Warming

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: GM Shifts to Manual Transmissions for Global Warming

Jeff DeWitt22 Jul 2007 21:04
>>> "Use of mobile phones is prohibited while your vehicle is in
>>> operation.  The only time you are permitted to use a mobile phone is
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I was just watching "Littleman" and one soccer mom changes the pampers
> while driving. It' a comedy but perhaps not too far from real life.

A caffeine IV would be more like it! <G>

Jeff DeWitt

donquijote195422 Jul 2007 20:34
> > "Use of mobile phones is prohibited while your vehicle is in
> > operation.  The only time you are permitted to use a mobile phone is
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Now banning coffee is something else again, thems fightin words!

You can try one of those hydration systems, right? ;)

I was just watching "Littleman" and one soccer mom changes the pampers
while driving. It' a comedy but perhaps not too far from real life.

Jeff DeWitt22 Jul 2007 16:42
>>>>>> The average driver is better off with an automatic.  The don't have to
>>>>>> worry about shifting at the right time, starting off on hills, down
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> free mobile phone when driving if it does not impede your hearing
> (i.e. one earphone only)."

No, NOT COFFEE!!! ANYTHING BUT THAT!

However it is a really bad idea to use a regular cell phone while
driving... requiring someone to be parked with the engine turned off is
a bit extreme but you should at least be stopped.

Now banning coffee is something else again, thems fightin words!

Jeff DeWitt

donquijote195422 Jul 2007 16:24
> >>>> The average driver is better off with an automatic.  The don't have to
> >>>> worry about shifting at the right time, starting off on hills, down
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> for the simple reason that freshly applied mascara is vitally important to
> the masses, for reasons we don't fully understand.)-

Or maybe we should ban cell phones (and coffee) like they do in
Germany (that northern European country)...

"Use of mobile phones is prohibited while your vehicle is in
operation.  The only time you are permitted to use a mobile phone is
if you are parked and the engine is turned-off.  You may use a hands-
free mobile phone when driving if it does not impede your hearing
(i.e. one earphone only)."

MikeWhy22 Jul 2007 00:29
>>>> The average driver is better off with an automatic.  The don't have to
>>>> worry about shifting at the right time, starting off on hills, down
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I agree with a couple others here, people who can't drive a standard are
> pussies.

I don't really disagree, but I feel better knowing that the ass-twat in
front of me juggling cellphone and coffee mug isn't also contending with a
clutch and h-shifter. (I also agree with the consensus; it won't sell here,
for the simple reason that freshly applied mascara is vitally important to
the masses, for reasons we don't fully understand.)

Keith Schiffner21 Jul 2007 23:59
>>> The average driver is better off with an automatic.  The don't have to
>>> worry about shifting at the right time, starting off on hills, down
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> They just don't know any better.
Could have fooled me...Korean pickups are more practical than the american ones.
Any fool that has trouble using a standard transmission is an uncoordinated
syphilitic monkey. I've the coordination of a B movie zombie and I can handle a
standard in almost any situation...haven't had the opportunity to drive arctic
ice or live lava flows.
I agree with a couple others here, people who can't drive a standard are
pussies.

Signature

Keith Schiffner
Reality is motorcycles all else is fantasy.
If you don't want to give her a hard ride you aren't a real man. Straight or gay
she gets your to grinning and acting like a fool kid.


Jeff DeWitt21 Jul 2007 21:14
>> The average driver is better off with an automatic.  The don't have to
>> worry about shifting at the right time, starting off on hills, down
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Graham

They just don't know any better.

Jeff DeWitt

Eeyore21 Jul 2007 19:42
> The average driver is better off with an automatic.  The don't have to
> worry about shifting at the right time, starting off on hills, down
> shifting for coming down steep hills, lugging the engine or riding the
> clutch.

Yes these are shocking challenges for citizens of the richest nation on earth.

Elsewhere on the planet it seems not to be seen as a problem.

Graham

Jeff DeWitt21 Jul 2007 11:59
> This is utter B.S. because the move to computerized automatics was to better
> control the engine and shifting, since many people stay in loer gears too
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> Ted

The average driver is better off with an automatic.  The don't have to
worry about shifting at the right time, starting off on hills, down
shifting for coming down steep hills, lugging the engine or riding the
clutch.  And it's hard to steer, shift, hold a cup of coffee and a cell
phone all at the same time!

But then there are a few oddballs like me who pretty much only drive
sticks... my last car with an automatic was also my first car, a
Studebaker Hawk.  My current car is a Jeep Cherokee and the clutch was
still working perfectly when the throwout bearing went out at 300,000 miles.

Jeff DeWitt

ROY BRAGG21 Jul 2007 06:23
This is utter B.S. because the move to computerized automatics was to better
control the engine and shifting, since many people stay in loer gears too
long or bluntly don't know haw to drive a standard.  As for repairs, I had a
friend that priced a manual rebuild, and it was around $1400 at the time,
approaximately the same as for an automatic.
Roy

>> The US is also a Hell of a lot bigger than Germany or Japan... and most
>> folks either don't like stick shifts or don't even know how to use them.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Ted

Ted Mittelstaedt20 Jul 2007 09:29
> The US is also a Hell of a lot bigger than Germany or Japan... and most
> folks either don't like stick shifts or don't even know how to use them.
>
> And the fact of that matter is that modern automatics are pretty damn
> good and the gas mileage difference is pretty minor.

Actually, a modern computer-controlled automatic is probably better
than most stick drivers in terms of fuel economy.

However, automatics are more complex and a lot more expensive to
fix, and do not last as long as manuals due to the complexity.

Ted

Jeff DeWitt20 Jul 2007 02:28
>>>> GM CEO Rick Wagoner described the initiative at a press conference at
>>>> the company headquarters in Detroit: "We've been coddling our lazy
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> A more advanced society burns three times as much fuel as Germany and
> Japan, and still gets no fun out of it? Funny.

The US is also a Hell of a lot bigger than Germany or Japan... and most
folks either don't like stick shifts or don't even know how to use them.

And the fact of that matter is that modern automatics are pretty damn
good and the gas mileage difference is pretty minor.

Jeff DeWitt

donquijote195420 Jul 2007 01:34
> >> GM CEO Rick Wagoner described the initiative at a press conference at
> >> the company headquarters in Detroit: "We've been coddling our lazy
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Most of the world also bathes once a week or less too, but that doesn't
> mean a more advanced society like ours needs to do the same thing.

A more advanced society burns three times as much fuel as Germany and
Japan, and still gets no fun out of it? Funny.

Jeff DeWitt20 Jul 2007 00:29
>> GM CEO Rick Wagoner described the initiative at a press conference at
>> the company headquarters in Detroit: "We've been coddling our lazy
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Graham

Most of the world also bathes once a week or less too, but that doesn't
mean a more advanced society like ours needs to do the same thing.

Jeff DeWitt

Eeyore19 Jul 2007 14:49
> GM CEO Rick Wagoner described the initiative at a press conference at
> the company headquarters in Detroit: "We've been coddling our lazy
> fellow Americans for too long. It's time everyone started using their
> left foot. This is what Jesus would do."

LOL !

It's what most of the world already does.

Graham

donquijote195419 Jul 2007 14:39
GM Shifts to Manual Transmissions for Global Warming

Responding to growing concerns over global warming, General Motors
(GM) announced today that it would make all of its vehicles with
standard transmissions, starting in 2009. Manual transmissions
generally get better fuel mileage than automatics.

GM CEO Rick Wagoner described the initiative at a press conference at
the company headquarters in Detroit: "We've been coddling our lazy
fellow Americans for too long. It's time everyone started using their
left foot. This is what Jesus would do."

Wagoner said that manual transmissions typically get 2-3 mpg better
mileage than the same vehicle equipped with an automatic, and that in
some cases the difference can be as much as 5 mpg. GM plans to focus
on high-efficiency manuals to minimize the company's output of
greenhouse gases. Manuals are also generally considered more fun to
drive and less expensive to manufacture and maintain.

The GM announcement received a mixed reaction. The late Jerry Falwell
rose from his grave to insist that Jesus would have driven a large van
with an automatic, because he would need to carry so many of his
followers. Other religious leaders hailed the effort to reduce global
warming.

On the environmental side, NRDC President Frances Beineke applauded
the move and encouraged other auto manufacturers to follow suit.

http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s8i21068

Well, it's all A SPOOF! You knew it, right? You know that, although
making a lot of sense, nothing will make the HUNGRY CORPORATIONS get
into a diet. Well, nothing but THE REVOLUTION...

http://atom.smasher.org/streetparty/?l1=Coming+Soon%3A&l2=the&l3=Banana+Revoluti
on%21&l4
=

WELCOME TO THE JUNGLE
http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.