>Suppose that our fuel tank was very safe, and 100% safe from >explosions. Suppose that you had an onboard fracturing device that would split water into hydrogen/oxygen. Then you wouldn't need an outside air source and the 'gas' tank would become a water tank that you could heat for no particular purpose except for below 0 weather.
>Instead of fuel injectors, why not heat up the fuel, and pump this >high pressure gaseous vapor into the pistons? I would like to see the >gas tank heated - kind of like a pressure cooker. And the escaping >gas vapor gets channeled into the pistons where it's further mixed >with air. And how would you inject this mixture into the pistons (more correctly into the combustion chamber) and why would you want to? That would make it a diesel.
>Currently, liquid gasoline is sprayed into the pistons. From what I >understand, the finer the mist, the better and more thorough the >combustion. Fuel injected gas engines are in lean burn and with all the controls to regulate fuel and ignition, you are as efficient as it gets as opposed to a carb setup. Combustion only occurs in the cylinders under pressure in the presence of spark. When the spark goes out, the flame goes out. Find a way to keep a spark going for the lenght of the power stroke and see the efficiencies escalate. Also see the tempratures rise dramatically.
>Since the gaseous gasoline is the limit to how finely you can atomize >the gas, I would think that this is the most optimum way to put gas >into the cylinders. There are enuff brains out there who are looking at possible ways to do more with less that if this were a viable idea it would be on cars now or at least announced for cars in (?) years.
|