Re: Fuel Pressure, Rail Pressure Gauges
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Fuel Pressure, Rail Pressure Gauges
| Tom Lawrence | 30 May 2007 18:19 |
> This is the justification from the mechanic I have been dealing with after > asking him why a rail pressure gauge is preferred over the fuel pressure: All of what he says is correct - however, all that information is available to any tech diagnosing the truck by simply hooking up the DRB3 will operating the truck. So having a rail pressure gauge is only going to be of use to you to indicate that, "yep, there's a problem - better take it to the dealer". However, the truck having little to no power is going to be an even bigger indicator of the same problem.
> I highly doubt that my truck will ever be anything but stock. I like it > just the way it is. Okay - then that narrows things down a bit. In your case, then, I'd say the most important gauge is the tranny temp gauge, followed by the pyro, followed by fuel pressure, and here's the reasoning:
In stock form, it's much more likely to kill your tranny from overheating it (pulling heavy at slow speeds, no torque converter lock-up, building lots of heat in the transmission) than it is to burn up your engine. When towing with my truck (and with the power dialed down to more sane levels), I could see 230°F+ on my tranny temp, before I would hit 1300°F on the pyro.
Now, that doesn't mean that the engine is immune from melting itself... the 3rd gens do run hotter than the previous 24V's, and with the right combination of power and load, it's possible to see 1350°F+ on your pyro - and that's not something you want to do for an extended period of time. At that point, it's time to slow down, downshift, get the engine RPMs (and thereby boost) up to help cool those EGT's a bit.
And lastly, from our previous discussions, a failed/failing lift pump can still cause damage to your injection pump... not nearly as quickly as the older 24V's, but the possibility is still there.
Other gauges - rail pressure, boost, and others, are simply informational.... you're not going to kill your engine if you loose boost (but you're going to know it right away, because power will be down, and EGT's will be up). You're also not going to damage anything if your FCA breaks and you lose rail pressure. Again, you're sure going to know it, because power will be low-to-non-existant - but again, no damage can come of it.
|
| Craig Christian | 30 May 2007 17:56 |
> First, while it's true the 3rd gen trucks' lift pumps were more reliable > than previous years, and the CP3 pump is much more tolerant of lower fuel > pressures, DC felt that the lift pump was still enough of an issue that they > re-designed the low-pressure side of the fuel system, and re-located the > fuel pump inside the tank. This is the justification from the mechanic I have been dealing with after asking him why a rail pressure gauge is preferred over the fuel pressure:
"On the rail pressure, low or fluctuating rail pressure don't necessarily equate to a dead CP3 (injection pump). It's use is to give the operator a base line of rail operating pressures at given load and engine rpm's. Out of the norm for same driving conditions could help diagnose the concern with the high pressure side of the fuel system. Ie. the fuel control acuator (fca) sticking or cycling improperly (low to no rail pressure) or a bad rail pressure sensor or fuel valve. both would cause performance concerns and could asst. Dodge or other diesel techs in more accurate diagnosis of the concern. For example the CP3 could be failing causing a low rail pressure, if the tech, did troubleshooting and found the FCA, rail sensors and low pressure side volume's to be up to par, the ECM (engine control module) or CP3 would be the obvious culprit."
Note, I am not trying to pit anyone against anyone. I trust this guy, he's a great mechanic. What I am trying to overcome is my own personal ignorance on the matter. I'd like to understand better why one is better than the other. Or ... if I'd be better served with scrapping the fuel gauges altogether and just put in two gauges (tranny temp and pyro).
> A rail pressure gauge is really just a "gee-whiz" kind of gauge, This is what I am trying to avoid. Having a gauge for the sake of having a gauge doesn't excite me at all.
> unless > you're planning on playing around with your fuel pressure to get more power [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > that I run on level 1 (mildest setting), just to give a little more fuel way > down low. I highly doubt that my truck will ever be anything but stock. I like it just the way it is.
> For reference, I currently run 7 gauges - pre-and-post-turbo EGT's > (pre-turbo being read by my TST box), boost, fuel pressure, tranny temp, oil > pressure, and water temp (needed to fill the last hole, and I never trust > the factory idiot lights in the shape of gauges). Okay ... you *might* need to calm down a little. :-)
Craig C.
|
| Tom Lawrence | 30 May 2007 17:37 |
> Mounting will be a 3 pod dash mount. I want a tranny temp, pyro and I > thought a fuel pressure gauge. However, the guy doing the install feels [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I thought about a boost gauge, but can't really think of what that gauge > gives me that I can't tell without it. First, while it's true the 3rd gen trucks' lift pumps were more reliable than previous years, and the CP3 pump is much more tolerant of lower fuel pressures, DC felt that the lift pump was still enough of an issue that they re-designed the low-pressure side of the fuel system, and re-located the fuel pump inside the tank.
There have still been reports of lift pumps failing, even on the 3rd gen trucks. While this doesn't automatically trash the injection pump like it used to in the VP44 days, it's still not a good thing for the CP3. Yes, the CP3 has it's own small gerotor lift pump built in, which in other applications draws straight from a fuel source (no aux. lift pump), but that's just it - it's not trying to suck fuel through a locked-up electric lift pump in those applications.
IMO, a fuel pressure gauge is still useful. I use mine all the time to judge when it's time to change fuel filters (I notice the drop-off in pressure, meaning the filter's getting more loaded up with gunk).
A rail pressure gauge is really just a "gee-whiz" kind of gauge, unless you're planning on playing around with your fuel pressure to get more power out of the engine. That's a whole 'nother story, then - and in that case, yes, a rail pressure gauge could be useful. I, personally, am against cranking up fuel pressure much beyond stock (the pictures I've seen of worn injectors sold me on that one). I currently have an Edge EZ box hooked up, that I run on level 1 (mildest setting), just to give a little more fuel way down low.
As for the boost gauge, again - not all that useful if you're running a stock truck. It can be helpful in diagnosing problems (for instance, a blown, or even leaking, intercooler boot is going to be easily noticable on your boost gauge).
For reference, I currently run 7 gauges - pre-and-post-turbo EGT's (pre-turbo being read by my TST box), boost, fuel pressure, tranny temp, oil pressure, and water temp (needed to fill the last hole, and I never trust the factory idiot lights in the shape of gauges).
|
| Craig Christian | 30 May 2007 17:13 |
Need a second opinion:
I am having Pricol Optix gauges installed on my 2004 Ram, CTD in the next few weeks. I like the Optix gauges because they match the OEM dash.
http://www.danininc.com/opticdetail22.html
Mounting will be a 3 pod dash mount. I want a tranny temp, pyro and I thought a fuel pressure gauge. However, the guy doing the install feels that I would be better served with a rail pressure gauge since the pump issue in my model Ram is no longer an issue at all.
Would like opinions ...
I thought about a boost gauge, but can't really think of what that gauge gives me that I can't tell without it.
TIA. Craig C.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|