Re: Fuel Pressure, Rail Pressure Gauges
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Fuel Pressure, Rail Pressure Gauges
| Tom Lawrence | 30 May 2007 18:06 |
> Does this sound correct? Well.... no :)
Back in ye olden days, when there were only two valves per cylinder, there was a mechanical lift pump mounted on the back of the engine that sucked fuel from the tank, and fed it up to the P7100 injection pump. The P7100 was lubricated by engine oil, and if for some strange reason the mechanical lift pump failed and stopped feeding fuel to the P7100, the extent of the damage done was probably a sore toe from you kicking the truck because it stopped running (not to mention all the fun of re-priming the fuel system and getting it running again... but still, no permanent damage done).
With the introduction of the 24V ISB engine, came electronics. With that, the mechanical lift pump was replaced with an electric pump, still mounted on the left-rear of the engine, still sucking fuel from the fuel tank, but now delivering it to a VP44 injection pump. The VP44 no longer used engine oil to lubricate itself as the P7100 did... it relied on diesel fuel for lubrication. You can see where this is going.... when (not if, but when) the electric lift pump failed, it starved the VP44 of fuel, which in very short order would gawl itself all up, and you were then the proud owner of TWO broken pumps.... one relatively cheap (the electric lift pump), and one really expensive (the VP44).
The 3rd gen trucks, with their new ISBe (also called the HPCR, High-Pressure Common Rail engine), use a different version of the same electric lift pump, and a newer, higher-pressure, yet still fuel-lubricated CP3 pump. The CP3 is cheaper to produce than the VP44, as there are no electronics (the VP44 contained electronics to control injection timing) - all the injection timing is now done at the injectors themselves. However, the CP3 is still an expensive unit, and not something you want to fail (and believe me, starve anything that spins around and around of lubrication, and that's exactly what will happen).
Starting in model year '05, DC decided that pulling fuel 12 or so feet through a tiny little tube probably wasn't the best use of a pump designed to push, rather than pull - and re-re-re-designed the fuel system with an in-tank "pusher" pump, that would now feed fuel directly to the CP3 (still going through the stock fuel filter canister, however). Guess what? Sometimes, those pumps fail, too. Of course, now you have the added fun of dropping the tank, and removing the fuel module to replace the pump - something that old 24V guys could do by feel on the side of the road on a moonless night inside of 10 minutes.
|
| Craig Christian | 30 May 2007 17:44 |
> why not do both. install a srt apillar trim and mount your piro there, > thats where mine is, and then your tranny and fuel pressure gauges up on > the dash.. or you could do the steering column mount, this mount comes in > both dual and single gauge. i've got a dual on mine but still only the > boost gauge (i have yet to buy the fuel pressure gauge) I considered the steering mount, but it blocks part of the dash. I'm a no-clutter kinda guy.
> i'll email ya a pic > of my setup if ya want. Yes, please.
> i personally still want to monitor the lift pump (but i have yet to > install the capability lol) Remember, I am not a mechanic, so what I'm about to say might be worded incorrectly ... or worse yet, just downright wrong. :-)
My understanding is that the issue on the older Rams was that they had two pumps. When the fuel pump in the tank failed it caused the lift pump to work harder and eventually fail. Which is why the fuel pressure gauge was necessary (to detect the failure of the cheap pump in the tank and get it fixed before the expensive lift pump failed). In my Ram, there is now just a single, more powerful lift pump. Therefore, the fuel pressure gauge really serves no purpose. However, the rail pressure gauge can be useful in detecting a faulty FCA.
Does this sound correct?
If I ever decide to add a boost gauge, I'll probably put it on the a-pillar with the SRT mount.
Thanks! Craig C.
|
| Chris Thompson | 30 May 2007 17:31 |
> Need a second opinion: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > TIA. > Craig C. why not do both. install a srt apillar trim and mount your piro there, thats where mine is, and then your tranny and fuel pressure gauges up on the dash.. or you could do the steering column mount, this mount comes in both dual and single gauge. i've got a dual on mine but still only the boost gauge (i have yet to buy the fuel pressure gauge) i'll email ya a pic of my setup if ya want.
i personally still want to monitor the lift pump (but i have yet to install the capability lol)
 Signature ____________________________________________ Chris 05 CTD 06 Liberty CRD
|
| Craig Christian | 30 May 2007 17:13 |
Need a second opinion:
I am having Pricol Optix gauges installed on my 2004 Ram, CTD in the next few weeks. I like the Optix gauges because they match the OEM dash.
http://www.danininc.com/opticdetail22.html
Mounting will be a 3 pod dash mount. I want a tranny temp, pyro and I thought a fuel pressure gauge. However, the guy doing the install feels that I would be better served with a rail pressure gauge since the pump issue in my model Ram is no longer an issue at all.
Would like opinions ...
I thought about a boost gauge, but can't really think of what that gauge gives me that I can't tell without it.
TIA. Craig C.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|