You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: seller's ignorance
| ACAR | 29 Aug 2006 10:51 |
> When selling my '93 Honda Accord ... Whenever I've sold a car to a private party: 1. take money 2. *take your plates off the car* 3. sign over title 4. wave bye-bye 5. call your insurance company and remove car from policy 6. notify DMV, turn in plates and get refund for remaining value of registration The buyer should come with temporary tags in order to drive away. Alternatively, if you are a nice guy, you and a buddy can drop the car off in the buyer's driveway, do the transaction and get a lift home in your buddy's car. You are not responsible for waiting at the DMV for the buyer to get new plates. In some states you are responsible for selling an inspected car.
|
| btrny@yahoo.com | 29 Aug 2006 09:48 |
When selling my '93 Honda Accord is it to both parties advantage to go to the DMV together to transfer title and finalize the deal (California)? Someone wanted to buy the car off me last night after driving it around the block. He had the money but I didn't feel comfortable with his haste. I have a feeling something may happen to the car before he gets around to going to the DMV and it may be my problem. Should I insist on going to the DMV together?
|
Quick links: