Re: CR-V Fires and Explosions
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: CR-V Fires and Explosions
| fish | 31 Dec 2006 10:29 |
Gene S. Berkowitz sez...
> In related news, I happened to be behind a late model RAV-4 tonight, > which had been in some sort of rear-end collision. The hatch was > crumpled, and the rear window was missing, replaced with plastic sheet.
> The spare tire, which seemed to be the obvious point of impact, looked > to be okay, as the hatch obviously sacrificed itself to save the tire. Where was this?
I will certainly investigate the tire location through more research - thanks!
The Highlander Hybrid is priced about 10K more than the CR-V/Rav-4.
The Honda Pilot doesn't get good gas mileage.
*sigh*
|
| Gene S. Berkowitz | 31 Dec 2006 04:29 |
In related news, I happened to be behind a late model RAV-4 tonight, which had been in some sort of rear-end collision. The hatch was crumpled, and the rear window was missing, replaced with plastic sheet.
The spare tire, which seemed to be the obvious point of impact, looked to be okay, as the hatch obviously sacrificed itself to save the tire.
--Gene
|
| jim beam | 31 Dec 2006 03:22 |
> jim beam disrespectfully claimed: >> i say you're a trolling dumb-a.s. > > I say you are trolling for a flame war, just like a cockroach. You can't > SHUT UP! go and hide behind mommy's skirt, idiot.
|
| fish | 31 Dec 2006 03:16 |
jim beam disrespectfully claimed:
> i say you're a trolling dumb-a.s. I say you are trolling for a flame war, just like a cockroach. You can't SHUT UP!
|
| jim beam | 31 Dec 2006 02:57 |
> jim beam typed: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Geesh! I post a newpaper article and suddenly the trolls start coming out > like roaches! correction: you post a scare story with the title "CR-V Fires and Explosions". which is "based" on an article 2 years old and proven to be sensationalist nonsense. on top of that, you have the temerity to dress this up as a request for easily accessible information that you're too damned lazy [or stupid] to find for yourself. i say you're a trolling dumb-a.s.
|
| fish | 31 Dec 2006 02:37 |
jim beam typed:
>> jim beam >> <-entire worthless crap snipped-> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> <-snip-> > what's constructive about a post titled "CR-V Fires and Explosions"? It was an article from the Washington Post.
Geesh! I post a newpaper article and suddenly the trolls start coming out like roaches!
|
| jim beam | 30 Dec 2006 18:38 |
> jim beam > <-entire worthless crap snipped-> > > If you can't offer any constructive dialog, then you are trolling for a > flame war. > <-snip-> what's constructive about a post titled "CR-V Fires and Explosions"?
|
| fish | 30 Dec 2006 17:58 |
jim beam <-entire worthless crap snipped->
If you can't offer any constructive dialog, then you are trolling for a flame war. <-snip->
|
| jim beam | 30 Dec 2006 06:32 |
<snip tossing suckie out of stroller>
> Yes, Honda redesigned the CR-V how do you know this?
> - but I want answers. I want to know > specifics of this redesign. you know that contradicts your first statement, right?
here's how it is kiddo; time you did some homework. details are all available on the net if you know where to look. they're even available in dead tree format if you want to pay for it. so, go away, find out what the hell you're talking about, then get back to us. if you don't know what you're talking about, you're just being an a.s.
|
| fish | 29 Dec 2006 01:32 |
Gordon McGrew sez...
> If the CRV meets your needs, you can buy it with confidence. Not when there are reports of fires and explosions!!
You take your own advice - for my hard earned money, my research has yielded shocking results.
> This minor glitch from the past isn't a factor. Oh, I beg to differ!!
Let's see you pay for a motor vehicle knowing the risks from the past.
Listen to me: I will be doing more research into this!!
I want answers from Honda if they expect me to even look in their direction as I drive past their lot on the way to the Toyota dealership.
> I'm sure those few incidents were dramatic although > calling it an explosion would be overstating it a bit.) I want to ask you to re-read the report of the explosion as the gentleman was attempting to open the hood and the entire front end exploded into flames.
I just can't ignore the RECENT past - it was only a few years ago!
Yes, Honda redesigned the CR-V - but I want answers. I want to know specifics of this redesign. _________ ===fish=== ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
|
| Gordon McGrew | 28 Dec 2006 06:52 |
>Gordon McGrew sez... > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >===fish=== >¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ The '07s are redesigned and I would think that they would do anything practical to reduce this risk.
There were a few possible contributing causes:
1. Oil filters installed too tight at the factory or some other problem that caused the gasket to stick to the mounting plate when the filter was removed at the first oil change.
2. Service techs not noticing the sticking gasket and installing the new filter with its gasket on top of the old one. This caused massive and immediate leaks (which the tech also should have noticed.)
3. Because of the layout in the engine compartment, the leaking oil landed on the exhaust which caused it to catch fire after a few miles.
#1 can happen from time to time on any car, thus making it critical that service techs guard against #2. #3 is true of other Honda vehicles (and perhaps other makes.) Not clear why this caused CRVs to catch fire more than any other such car.
This was a little mysterious, but the problem was easily avoidable with a little care. The problem was never very common (22 out of 140,000 2003s = 1 per 6000+) and doesn't seem to have occurred recently indicating that the problem has been solved one way or the other.
If the CRV meets your needs, you can buy it with confidence. This minor glitch from the past isn't a factor. (By minor, I mean that we are talking about a couple dozen vehicles out of millions that Honda has sold. I'm sure those few incidents were dramatic although calling it an explosion would be overstating it a bit.)
|
| fish | 28 Dec 2006 05:37 |
Gordon McGrew sez...
> Thanks for the stroll down memory lane. Any reason you are posting > this now? Yes - I am currently researching for my next motor vehicle and was very seriously considering a Honda CR-V because it is rated very high on Consumer Reports as well as Edmunds and Kelly's Blue Book.
However, what I would like to know is this.
Did Honda ever redesign the CR-V to prevent that type of disaster from ever happening again?
As a consumer, I am currently afraid of the Honda product CR-V SUV motor vehicle. __________ ===fish=== ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
|
| Gordon McGrew | 28 Dec 2006 04:52 |
>27 Fires Linked To Oil Changes In Honda CR-V (washingtonpost.com)27 Fires >Linked To Oil Changes In Honda CR-V > >By Greg Schneider >Washington Post Staff Writer >Friday, July 9, 2004; Page A01 Thanks for the stroll down memory lane. Any reason you are posting this now?
|
| fish | 28 Dec 2006 03:39 |
27 Fires Linked To Oil Changes In Honda CR-V (washingtonpost.com)27 Fires Linked To Oil Changes In Honda CR-V
By Greg Schneider Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, July 9, 2004; Page A01
At least 27 Honda CR-V sport-utility vehicles from the 2003 and 2004 model years burst into flames shortly after getting their first oil changes, according to records provided to the federal government by the manufacturer.
While no injuries were reported, many of the vehicles were destroyed, usually with 10,000 miles or fewer on their odometers. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration investigated the situation and concluded July 1 that the cases were the fault of dealerships or others who improperly installed oil filters. The agency agreed with American Honda Motor Co. that oil from the filters most likely leaked onto the vehicles' hot exhaust systems, quickly igniting -- in some cases as the owners drove the small SUVs home from being serviced.
"We consulted with Honda. Honda concluded it was a technician's error, and they have taken steps to make sure service technicians who work on this vehicle understand that they need to be particularly diligent when they replace the oil filter," NHTSA spokesman Rae Tyson said. But auto safety advocates say they're dismayed that the agency didn't take a stronger stand. "Relatively new cars catching on fire? Running the risk of injuring their occupants? It's a very unusual and a very dangerous situation," said Sally Greenberg of Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports. The fact that a routine oil change could have such catastrophic results suggests "a dire and a dangerous situation that both the automaker and the auto safety agency should have looked much more closely at," she said.
Honda, whose products are consistently rated among the safest vehicles, doesn't know why the fires are happening in only the two most recent CR-V models, spokesman Andy Boyd said. "That's the part we're still investigating. Honestly, that's something we're still trying to understand," he said, adding that there have been no major design changes.
While Boyd said the problem is "absolutely not a design defect," he said the CR-V's engine is configured "such that there is a higher likelihood of oil spraying onto the manifold than . . . on other vehicles." Honda has no plan to recall the vehicles and install a barrier to block the oil from hitting the hot exhaust manifold, he said.
"At this stage I don't believe we think a recall is warranted," Boyd said "We think with a little more communication and education with the dealers, the problem can be eliminated."
About 140,000 CR-Vs were sold in the United States in 2003. Honda said 22 of them caught fire from the apparent oil filter problem. So far this year, five owners of 2004 CR-Vs have reported such fires to NHTSA.
NHTSA's records relate the stories of drivers whose vehicles caught fire. Their names were blacked out. A woman driving on Braddock Road in Northern Virginia last January noticed smoke coming from under her 2003 CR-V. A passerby pulled up and told her it was on fire, so she swerved onto the shoulder, the electrical system shorted out and all the doors locked. She got out without injury.
A North Carolina family driving to church one Sunday in May noticed smoke and had to rush to get their two small children unbuckled from safety seats before their 2004 CR-V went up in flames.
A Georgia man coming home from a flea market stopped when he noticed smoke, tried to open his hood and "heard an explosion and the front end just burst into flames," according to records Honda supplied to NHTSA.
All had recently had their oil changed for the first time. Honda recently warned its technicians about the need to be careful replacing oil filters in a regular newsletter mailed out to all 1,008 U.S. dealer service shops, Boyd said.
Now the company is drafting a letter to the dealerships themselves, as well as preparing an article for a newsletter sent periodically to independent repair shops such as Jiffy Lube and Pep Boys. Honda also plans to change the language on the oil filter itself and its packaging, warning of the dangers of improper installation.
There are no plans to send warnings to customers who might change the oil themselves, Boyd said.
The problem is believed to happen one of two ways: The O-ring gasket on the old oil filter sometimes sticks to the crankcase, and if the new filter is installed over it, oil can leak around it. Or, if the gasket on the new filter isn't lubricated properly, it might set incorrectly and allow oil to leak around it. Then it can spray onto the hot manifold and burn.
Kay C. Brittain of Jacksonville, Fla., was driving to work from her first 5,000-mile oil change when she noticed black smoke in her rearview mirror. She pulled onto the median to turn and go back to the dealership, but a passing motorist shouted that her 2004 CR-V was on fire. A week later, the elderly parents of one of Brittain's co-workers avoided injury when their 2003 CR-V burst into flames.
Brittain, 56, who learned from Web site chat groups of other such incidents around the country, said she had no problems with the 2002 CR-V she drove for two years before trading it in for the new model. Now that she has gotten her dealer to replace the one that burned with another 2004 CR-V, she has lost her peace of mind.
"It just scares me. Here I'm sitting with a brand new car, and come 5,000 miles I'm going to have to go through it again," she said. "I don't want this to happen to somebody else. If there is a problem, I think Honda should acknowledge it and at least check this out and not write it off. "I'm just afraid something bad's going to happen. I just want them to take it seriously."
© 2004 The Washington Post Company
|
Quick links:
|
|
|