consider the business proposition for the company offering the warranty:
 if the car is likely to break down with something that'll cost you,
you'll lose money.  so you'll only insure prospects that are likely
/not/ to fail.  also, consider the language of the warranty.  when i
read the fine print on the warranty my grandmother bought, it only
covered the stuff that never fails, like crankshaft, con rods, etc.
stuff that does fail like shocks or suspension bushings, ignition
systems, radiators, were excluded.  of course, she didn't read this
before signing, and the sales droid told her it covered everything, but
from what i can see, extended warranties are /highly/ unlikely to be
worth it.  bank the cash and save it instead.

Hi
I just bought the 2007 civic LX A/T. I am thinking of the extended warranty
for 7years/130000 km for 1000$ Canadian. What do you guys think , are people
taking it.  Basic warranty is 3 year for bumper to bumper and 5 years for
powertrain and tranny.  I have had two Hondas before 93 Civic and 92 Accord
and never had a problem before 8 years, but I hear quality is not what it
used to be, excellent compared to everybody else but not the same comparted
to older gen Hondas. I am planning to keep this car for at least 8 years
I appreciate the help.

I believe you have a few months to exercise the extended warranty for the
same price

Tx again