Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: How good are Hankook tires for the Accord?

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: How good are Hankook tires for the Accord?

High Tech Misfit30 May 2007 21:37
> I got the Falken Ziex's for my 2000 Honda Accord in November and they
> were DEAD within 18 months. I do a lot of highway miles, but rotated
> every 7K and got about 18K out of them. Pretty bad treadwear if you
> ask me.

What size tires were your Ziex's?  According to Falken's website, 30-55
series tires have only a 30,000 mile warranty, while 60 and higher series
tires have a 60,000 mile warranty.  I would get a 195/60-15 size tire, so
perhaps they may last somewhat longer on my Civic.

> I just replaced them with Kuhmos that I got on tirerack.com for about
> 50/each. This time I focused more on treadwear ratings vs.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> they tend to use the lowest counterweight to make them perfect (if
> that).

Which model of Kumho tire did you get?  I was also considering the Kumho
Ecsta ASX.

Butcher30 May 2007 18:13
> I'm considering getting a set of Falken Ziex 512's, which I hear are good
> performing tires at a low price.  Although treadwear seems to be this tire's
> weakest point, I estimate that I'll drive only 10,000 miles a year.  So they
> should last me at least 3 years, possibly more since I use winter tires when
> necessary.

I got the Falken Ziex's for my 2000 Honda Accord in November and they
were DEAD within 18 months. I do a lot of highway miles, but rotated
every 7K and got about 18K out of them. Pretty bad treadwear if you
ask me.

I just replaced them with Kuhmos that I got on tirerack.com for about
50/each. This time I focused more on treadwear ratings vs.
performance. It's only been 1000 miles with these, but performance-
wise they're no different from the Ziex's (haven't had heavy rain/snow
yet, so we'll see).

The guy who mounted/balanced them remarked that the Kuhmos rarely need
much to balance - he said they arrive balanced 'out of the box' and
they tend to use the lowest counterweight to make them perfect (if
that).

High Tech Misfit27 May 2007 00:16
> I've got Hankook H406's on my Integra right now. I suppose they're decent
> enough. Put about 20K miles on them so far.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I find the quality of the mounting and balancing job is far more important
> than the tire itself.

I agree, although the tire itself is still a factor, depending on what
characteristics you want in a tire.  I bought my '04 Civic last fall with
newly installed Bridgestone Insignia's on it.  These tires have been
horrible in every possible way.

I'm considering getting a set of Falken Ziex 512's, which I hear are good
performing tires at a low price.  Although treadwear seems to be this tire's
weakest point, I estimate that I'll drive only 10,000 miles a year.  So they
should last me at least 3 years, possibly more since I use winter tires when
necessary.

Tegger26 May 2007 23:54
> I had a set of 4 Hankook Tires put on my 2005 accord ex sedan a month
> ago. I believe they are 205/60HR 14's. So far so good.

I've got Hankook H406's on my Integra right now. I suppose they're decent
enough. Put about 20K miles on them so far.

They are not nearly as direct and rigid as the Yokohama ES100's I had on
there previously. The Hankooks seem to have a softer, squirmier sidewall.

I find the quality of the mounting and balancing job is far more important
than the tire itself.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/


alfred26 May 2007 14:09
I had a set of 4 Hankook Tires put on my 2005 accord ex sedan a month ago. I
believe they are 205/60HR 14's. So far so good. I did have to get one of the
valve stems replaced because it was leaking after going to the carwash, but
the tire place that I had it done did it for free as they gave me a lifetime
warrenty on anything that happens to the tires. I think the car washer was
too rough with the tire brush when he was cleaning my wheels before I
entered the carwash and thats what caused it to leak. I priced them at the
store and it would have been around 600 dollars installed with balancing,
but I got a special deal online for $415.00 for all 4 tires, installed with
balancing, tax, tire disposal, and front and rear alignment too.

Anybody know what these tires are like? I heard they were good but just
thought I'd ask y'all to see if anyone has any thoughts. I know I wont make
it through a RI winter with my old tires that were 80% worn already and I
still have 9 months to go. Why the old stock tires got to 80% worn after
32,000 miles is beyond me, but they did even though the treadware was 340,
go figure!

Al

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.