You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Honda's hydrogen-fuel-cell FCX Clarity
| JXStern | 02 Dec 2007 02:03 |
>The downside, of course, is that PRODUCING hydrogen in quantity is not >generally a zero-emission process (unless you have substantial hydro- or >nuclear-generated electricity available). If you mean someone is burning coal upstream, I suppose so, but the idea is that big centralized power generation is both cleaner and more efficient than most vehicles, so if the resulting consumption is clean, it's a net winner.
Y'know, I don't get it, if you asked anybody five years ago what would make sense for vehicles when oil reached $100/barrel, they'd have said all sorts of alternatives could come online at those prices. Maybe even hydrogen.
J.
|
| Matt Ion | 02 Dec 2007 01:18 |
> "...this is a true zero-emission vehicle, yet it looks, operates and > drives like anything else on the road. There is simply no more [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Wall Street Journal: http://301url.com/f43 The downside, of course, is that PRODUCING hydrogen in quantity is not generally a zero-emission process (unless you have substantial hydro- or nuclear-generated electricity available).
|
| Nomen Nescio | 01 Dec 2007 20:50 |
"...this is a true zero-emission vehicle, yet it looks, operates and drives like anything else on the road. There is simply no more realistic a peek into the possibly green future of the automobile, not the theoretical Chevrolet Volt from General Motors, nor the electric Tesla billionaire-toy, and not even the Holy Green Grail of the plug-in Prius..."
Wall Street Journal: http://301url.com/f43
|
Quick links: