Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: Newer cars a lot safer? Worth the expense?

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Newer cars a lot safer? Worth the expense?

Private Private16 Feb 2008 06:35
My mother has been in the insurance industry for the last 30 years . She
has extensive experience in the claims division. She says she can't tell
enough people to wear their seatbelt. She's seen countless accidents
where the person in the car wearing a seatbelt walked away from the
crash. Whereas the other person in the vehicle is dead because they
chose not to wear a seatbelt.  Airbags do make a HUGE difference,but
without a seatbelt they're pracically useless. Look at crash ratings to
see which car has better ratings. Smaller doesn't neccessarily mean less
safe. If a smaller car has better crumple zones than a bigger car does.
The smaller car will generally be more safe because the car is design to
'absorb' the impact. Google safety ratings for the model your interested
in.

Dan C11 Feb 2008 04:29
>> but I feel like I should
>> probably buy a newer car with airbags for more safety in a crash.

> if that is truly a concern, wear a helmet.  seriously.  if transport
> safety authorities were serious about safety, helmets and 5-point seat
> belts would be mandatory.

Will a helmet keep the steering column from piercing your chest?

Will a helmet keep your neck and ribs from snapping when that SUV hits you
directly on the driver's door at 60mph?

The answer to both questions is "NO".  An airbag likely would, though.

I wouldn't drive, or let any member of my family drive, a vehicle without
airbags.  Yeah, we all used to do it "back in the day", but things change.
There's just no good reason to not have them now.  Not to mention the fact
that the roads are crowded with inattentive morons talking on cell phones
while driving 20+ MPH over the speed limit, and driving the biggest
vehicle they (can't) afford.  An airbag is a necessity.

> 1. paradoxically, the gas savings of more efficient modern engines are
> offset by much heavier modern cars, so no benefit there.

We're talking safety here, not gas mileage.  Would you rather be safe(r),
or save $0.23 on a trip across town?

> 2. heavier cars are harder to stop, given that tire sizes are the same
> and thus available braking traction is the same.

Tire sizes are generally quite a bit wider now-a-days than they used to
be, not to mention the existence of ABS.  Today's cars can stop *MUCH*
better than a car of 15-20 years ago.

> 3. modern cars consume more resources in their manufacture.

That's beyond our control, and not a factor in anything.

Signature

"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".


jim beam11 Feb 2008 04:00
> I have a 1991 Honda Civic and it runs well,

great car.

> but I feel like I should
> probably buy a newer car with airbags for more safety in a crash.

if that is truly a concern, wear a helmet.  seriously.  if transport
safety authorities were serious about safety, helmets and 5-point seat
belts would be mandatory.

> Another reason I might want to buy another car is that mine is small.
> A larger car would probably provide additional protection.  On the
> other hand, if I keep my current car I'd save money.  Does anyone
> think it's not necessarily worthy spending the money for a bigger car
> with airbags?

these are not airbag issues, but they are "should i buy a more modern
car or look at the big picture" issues:

1. paradoxically, the gas savings of more efficient modern engines are
offset by much heavier modern cars, so no benefit there.

2. heavier cars are harder to stop, given that tire sizes are the same
and thus available braking traction is the same.

3. modern cars consume more resources in their manufacture.

ahorsefly@yahoo.com10 Feb 2008 19:56
I have a 1991 Honda Civic and it runs well, but I feel like I should
probably buy a newer car with airbags for more safety in a crash.
Another reason I might want to buy another car is that mine is small.
A larger car would probably provide additional protection.  On the
other hand, if I keep my current car I'd save money.  Does anyone
think it's not necessarily worthy spending the money for a bigger car
with airbags?

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.