You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Newer cars a lot safer? Worth the expense?
| jim beam | 11 Feb 2008 04:00 |
> I have a 1991 Honda Civic and it runs well, great car.
> but I feel like I should > probably buy a newer car with airbags for more safety in a crash. if that is truly a concern, wear a helmet. seriously. if transport safety authorities were serious about safety, helmets and 5-point seat belts would be mandatory.
> Another reason I might want to buy another car is that mine is small. > A larger car would probably provide additional protection. On the > other hand, if I keep my current car I'd save money. Does anyone > think it's not necessarily worthy spending the money for a bigger car > with airbags? these are not airbag issues, but they are "should i buy a more modern car or look at the big picture" issues:
1. paradoxically, the gas savings of more efficient modern engines are offset by much heavier modern cars, so no benefit there.
2. heavier cars are harder to stop, given that tire sizes are the same and thus available braking traction is the same.
3. modern cars consume more resources in their manufacture.
|
| ahorsefly@yahoo.com | 10 Feb 2008 19:56 |
I have a 1991 Honda Civic and it runs well, but I feel like I should probably buy a newer car with airbags for more safety in a crash. Another reason I might want to buy another car is that mine is small. A larger car would probably provide additional protection. On the other hand, if I keep my current car I'd save money. Does anyone think it's not necessarily worthy spending the money for a bigger car with airbags?
|
Quick links: