Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: Coolant Vanishing: '95 Civic EX 1.6 - Attn Tegger and Techs

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Coolant Vanishing: '95 Civic EX 1.6 - Attn Tegger and Techs

jim beam20 Feb 2008 22:47
>> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> Boiling hot coolant isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold
> coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping the pressure up.

sorry, that's fundamentally incorrect.  coolant liquid most definitely
expands as it heats - for both systems.  pressure doesn't stop coolant
expanding, it simply raises the boiling point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_thermal_expansion

> Since about '92 most Hondas will self-bleed any trapped air because the
> rad cap is the highest point in the system. When any trapped air is
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> 'Curly'

motsco_20 Feb 2008 22:34
> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> I get my bit of "misinformation" from the behavior of 27 different cars over
> a period 38 years.  Where do you get yours?

---------------------

Sorry, misinformation is a strong word.

Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The
coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA
isn't supposed to, since it's reservoir isn't under pressure at all.
Boiling hot coolant isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold
coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping the pressure up.

Since about '92 most Hondas will self-bleed any trapped air because the
rad cap is the highest point in the system. When any trapped air is
forced out, the air is supposed to bubble through the reservoir and when
the system next cools, the level in the reservoir drops as coolant it
drawn back in. That's when the owner is supposed to add coolant up to
the MAX mark on bottle. The owner's manuals and the Helms service manual
all tell the same story.

However, none of this theory applies if there's a hole in a hose, the
head, the heater core, the water pump seal, or if the rad cap is shot.

'Curly'

E Meyer20 Feb 2008 17:24
On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,

>> Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here.  How low was it in the
>> reservoir?  When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> 'Curly'

I get my bit of "misinformation" from the behavior of 27 different cars over
a period 38 years.  Where do you get yours?

motsco_20 Feb 2008 17:00
> Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here.  How low was it in the
> reservoir?  When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the "min" mark when the engine has cooled & the level will rise to around
> the "max" mark when the engine is hot & has been running for a while.

----------------------------

Where did you get this bit of misinformation? I've owned six Hondas and
the level in the reservoir never changes more than about 1", hot or
cold, summer or winter.

If yours changes that much, there's something radically wrong from what
the Honda engineers designed.

'Curly'

E Meyer20 Feb 2008 16:18
On 2/20/08 6:20 AM, in article gWUuj.16648$FK2.1405@trndny08,

>>>>>>   When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to
>>>>>>   add
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> preventive measure. Thanks for your response. If you could answer this
> post before this evening, when I drop it off, I'd appreciate it greatly.

Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here.  How low was it in the
reservoir?  When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or
the radiator?  

In normal use, the system will settle out to where the overflow tank sits at
the "min" mark when the engine has cooled & the level will rise to around
the "max" mark when the engine is hot & has been running for a while.

I certainly would not spend money replacing a head gasket that has not even
been diagnosed.  There is not enough info here to even say for sure that
there is a problem.

mjc13<REMOVETHIS>20 Feb 2008 12:20
>>>>>   When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to
>>>>>   add
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> the rad filler neck. These change color in the presence of combustion
> gases in the coolant.

    The procedure in the Honda manual online in the UK is to just use a
hand pump-operated pressurizer with guage, and see if the pressure drops
in the cooling system or cap. I don't know which they used at the shop...

> Your problem is NOT the rad cap. If it were, the reservoir would be
> FULL.

   Good point.

> There is also the possibility of a worn water pump. In that case the
> coolant would drip down the block under the timing belt cover and may
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> supposed to check your coolant level every time you open the hood, or at
> least once a week.

    What I'm going to do, assuming I can even afford the cost of a new
gasket done by the dealer, is to tell them to look for leaks, especially
at the water pump. If they find none, I'll have them replace the head
gasket. Shouldn't they install the new timing belt and water pump for no
extra labor charge (they will be providing the parts, not me) when they
do the gasket? I'm also having the front oil seals replaced as a
preventive measure. Thanks for your response. If you could answer this
post before this evening, when I drop it off, I'd appreciate it greatly.

Tegger20 Feb 2008 11:39
>>>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to
>>>>    add
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> going straight to the exhaust and not burning much, how safe is it to
> leave it alone? Any suggestions?

The pressure test needs to be performed in two places.
1) the cooling system, and
2) the combusion chambers.

the first is done in conjuction with the introduction of UV dye to the
coolant, this being detected on the outside with a black light. The
second consists of shop air being blown into each combustion chamber,
then the rad filler neck being then inspected for bubbles.

There is a third test that uses special paper test strips dipped into
the rad filler neck. These change color in the presence of combustion
gases in the coolant.

Your problem is NOT the rad cap. If it were, the reservoir would be
FULL.

There is also the possibility of a worn water pump. In that case the
coolant would drip down the block under the timing belt cover and may
not be obvious. Findinig that leak means carefully inspecting the crank
pulley area.

Do not put this off. You WILL damage your engine, possibly badly. You're
supposed to check your coolant level every time you open the hood, or at
least once a week.

Signature

Tegger

The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ
www.tegger.com/hondafaq/


mjc13<REMOVETHIS>19 Feb 2008 21:48
>>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
>>> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> problem. I may have the system pressure-tested if replacing the cap
> doesn't work. Thanks.

   I took the car to a local shop today. They do free pressure tests (I
gave them $20 anyway). No leaks, including the cap. Unless I'm missing
something, it has to be the #@!@# head gasket, right? Assuming it's
going straight to the exhaust and not burning much, how safe is it to
leave it alone? Any suggestions?

mjc13<REMOVETHIS>19 Feb 2008 10:07
>>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
>> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Hi,
> First I'd replace the rad. cap and see.

   Good idea. I didn't realize that pressure leaks were such a common
problem. I may have the system pressure-tested if replacing the cap
doesn't work. Thanks.

Tony Hwang18 Feb 2008 21:30
>    When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Winter weather. How common are internal head gasket leaks in this
> engine, as opposed to slow leaks in the reservoirs?
Hi,
First I'd replace the rad. cap and see.

mjc13<REMOVETHIS>18 Feb 2008 21:20
When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add
"quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM,
with a spotty service record, I had hoped that it was simply not topped
off ever. Now, three months later, with only moderate driving, I see the
reservoir is virtually empty again. I don't see excessive white smoke in
the exhaust, or smell antifreeze in it - although I haven't sniffed it
specifically for that, yet. The oil looks fine. I don't smell coolant
inside the car, either. It would be hard to spot a slow drip in this wet
Winter weather. How common are internal head gasket leaks in this
engine, as opposed to slow leaks in the reservoirs?

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.