Re: Coolant Vanishing: different direction Coefficient_of_thermal_expansion
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Coolant Vanishing: different direction Coefficient_of_thermal_expansion
| Grumpy AuContraire | 21 Feb 2008 17:20 |
>>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. >>>> The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] >> >> 'Curly' I think the key here is; "Liquids cannot be compressed."
If a given liquid (at normal ambient temperatures) is heated, it will expand but remain in a liquid state hence, it has to go somewhere to accommodate the resultant expansion.
In modern cars, this is the coolant reservoir while in the older tin of the past, it was simply the space at the top of the radiator.
JT
|
| jim beam | 21 Feb 2008 16:24 |
>>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. >>> The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > up much more room than cold coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping > the pressure up". but that's not true. as the liquid warms up, it expands substantially. that's why the "max" mark on the bottle is only half way down, not near the top. and that's why old fashioned thermometers work - as the volume of liquid in the bulb expands, it rises through the tube.
http://www.forestry-suppliers.com/product_pages/View_Catalog_Page.asp?mi=8225#
> The word 'boiling' was used as an adjective, not a verb the first time. > If you (disable the cooling fan so as to) boil it, you'll certainly fill [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > 'Curly' |
| motsco_ | 21 Feb 2008 16:02 |
>> Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The >> coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_thermal_expansion -----------------------------
I should have said "Coolant that is _boiling-hot_ isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping the pressure up". The word 'boiling' was used as an adjective, not a verb the first time. If you (disable the cooling fan so as to) boil it, you'll certainly fill the reservoir to the top, but in a healthy Honda cooling system, the level in the reservoir isn't supposed to go up and down 4 - 5 inches every time you drive it.
'Curly'
|
| jim beam | 20 Feb 2008 22:47 |
>> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com, >> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > Boiling hot coolant isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold > coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping the pressure up. sorry, that's fundamentally incorrect. coolant liquid most definitely expands as it heats - for both systems. pressure doesn't stop coolant expanding, it simply raises the boiling point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_thermal_expansion
> Since about '92 most Hondas will self-bleed any trapped air because the > rad cap is the highest point in the system. When any trapped air is [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > 'Curly' |
| motsco_ | 20 Feb 2008 22:34 |
> On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com, > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > I get my bit of "misinformation" from the behavior of 27 different cars over > a period 38 years. Where do you get yours? ---------------------
Sorry, misinformation is a strong word.
Volvos and Dodge products that I owned had pressurized reservoirs. The coolant level in them went up and down with temperature, but the HONDA isn't supposed to, since it's reservoir isn't under pressure at all. Boiling hot coolant isn't supposed to take up much more room than cold coolant, as long as the rad cap is keeping the pressure up.
Since about '92 most Hondas will self-bleed any trapped air because the rad cap is the highest point in the system. When any trapped air is forced out, the air is supposed to bubble through the reservoir and when the system next cools, the level in the reservoir drops as coolant it drawn back in. That's when the owner is supposed to add coolant up to the MAX mark on bottle. The owner's manuals and the Helms service manual all tell the same story.
However, none of this theory applies if there's a hole in a hose, the head, the heater core, the water pump seal, or if the rad cap is shot.
'Curly'
|
| E Meyer | 20 Feb 2008 17:24 |
On 2/20/08 11:03 AM, in article 13ron1td7br568a@corp.supernews.com,
>> Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here. How low was it in the >> reservoir? When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > 'Curly' I get my bit of "misinformation" from the behavior of 27 different cars over a period 38 years. Where do you get yours?
|
| motsco_ | 20 Feb 2008 17:00 |
> Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here. How low was it in the > reservoir? When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > the "min" mark when the engine has cooled & the level will rise to around > the "max" mark when the engine is hot & has been running for a while. ----------------------------
Where did you get this bit of misinformation? I've owned six Hondas and the level in the reservoir never changes more than about 1", hot or cold, summer or winter.
If yours changes that much, there's something radically wrong from what the Honda engineers designed.
'Curly'
|
| E Meyer | 20 Feb 2008 16:18 |
On 2/20/08 6:20 AM, in article gWUuj.16648$FK2.1405@trndny08,
>>>>>> When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to >>>>>> add [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > preventive measure. Thanks for your response. If you could answer this > post before this evening, when I drop it off, I'd appreciate it greatly. Seems like you're jumping the gun a little bit here. How low was it in the reservoir? When you say reservoir do you just mean the overflow tank, or the radiator?
In normal use, the system will settle out to where the overflow tank sits at the "min" mark when the engine has cooled & the level will rise to around the "max" mark when the engine is hot & has been running for a while.
I certainly would not spend money replacing a head gasket that has not even been diagnosed. There is not enough info here to even say for sure that there is a problem.
|
| mjc13<REMOVETHIS> | 20 Feb 2008 12:20 |
>>>>> When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to >>>>> add [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > the rad filler neck. These change color in the presence of combustion > gases in the coolant. The procedure in the Honda manual online in the UK is to just use a hand pump-operated pressurizer with guage, and see if the pressure drops in the cooling system or cap. I don't know which they used at the shop...
> Your problem is NOT the rad cap. If it were, the reservoir would be > FULL. Good point.
> There is also the possibility of a worn water pump. In that case the > coolant would drip down the block under the timing belt cover and may [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > supposed to check your coolant level every time you open the hood, or at > least once a week. What I'm going to do, assuming I can even afford the cost of a new gasket done by the dealer, is to tell them to look for leaks, especially at the water pump. If they find none, I'll have them replace the head gasket. Shouldn't they install the new timing belt and water pump for no extra labor charge (they will be providing the parts, not me) when they do the gasket? I'm also having the front oil seals replaced as a preventive measure. Thanks for your response. If you could answer this post before this evening, when I drop it off, I'd appreciate it greatly.
|
| Tegger | 20 Feb 2008 11:39 |
>>>> When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to >>>> add [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > going straight to the exhaust and not burning much, how safe is it to > leave it alone? Any suggestions? The pressure test needs to be performed in two places. 1) the cooling system, and 2) the combusion chambers.
the first is done in conjuction with the introduction of UV dye to the coolant, this being detected on the outside with a black light. The second consists of shop air being blown into each combustion chamber, then the rad filler neck being then inspected for bubbles.
There is a third test that uses special paper test strips dipped into the rad filler neck. These change color in the presence of combustion gases in the coolant.
Your problem is NOT the rad cap. If it were, the reservoir would be FULL.
There is also the possibility of a worn water pump. In that case the coolant would drip down the block under the timing belt cover and may not be obvious. Findinig that leak means carefully inspecting the crank pulley area.
Do not put this off. You WILL damage your engine, possibly badly. You're supposed to check your coolant level every time you open the hood, or at least once a week.
 Signature Tegger
The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/
|
| mjc13<REMOVETHIS> | 19 Feb 2008 21:48 |
>>> When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add >>> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > problem. I may have the system pressure-tested if replacing the cap > doesn't work. Thanks. I took the car to a local shop today. They do free pressure tests (I gave them $20 anyway). No leaks, including the cap. Unless I'm missing something, it has to be the #@!@# head gasket, right? Assuming it's going straight to the exhaust and not burning much, how safe is it to leave it alone? Any suggestions?
|
| mjc13<REMOVETHIS> | 19 Feb 2008 10:07 |
>> When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add >> "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Hi, > First I'd replace the rad. cap and see. Good idea. I didn't realize that pressure leaks were such a common problem. I may have the system pressure-tested if replacing the cap doesn't work. Thanks.
|
| Tony Hwang | 18 Feb 2008 21:30 |
> When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add > "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Winter weather. How common are internal head gasket leaks in this > engine, as opposed to slow leaks in the reservoirs? Hi, First I'd replace the rad. cap and see.
|
| mjc13<REMOVETHIS> | 18 Feb 2008 21:20 |
When I had the oil changed in November, I was told they had to add "quite a bit" of coolant to the reservoir. Since the car came from NM, with a spotty service record, I had hoped that it was simply not topped off ever. Now, three months later, with only moderate driving, I see the reservoir is virtually empty again. I don't see excessive white smoke in the exhaust, or smell antifreeze in it - although I haven't sniffed it specifically for that, yet. The oil looks fine. I don't smell coolant inside the car, either. It would be hard to spot a slow drip in this wet Winter weather. How common are internal head gasket leaks in this engine, as opposed to slow leaks in the reservoirs?
|
Quick links:
|
|
|