You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: repl battery for accord 01
| flobert | 29 Jul 2005 17:10 |
>> Yes and no. The battery is designed to be chargable. using, and >> draining and charging the battery doesn't 'damage it' per se. If it is [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >through twenty cycles of 90% discharge followed by full recharge. Most >will be dead by the end of such a torture test. a 90% discharge takes its voltage to somewhere in the 5-6V range, obviously that damages plates. 10V is about 50%, and is aboutt he minimum limit for successfull resotation.
>John |
| John Horner | 28 Jul 2005 22:48 |
> Yes and no. The battery is designed to be chargable. using, and > draining and charging the battery doesn't 'damage it' per se. If it is > kept below 10V for an extended period of time (say 12 hours or more) > then it is irreperably damaged. using a trickle charger is the best > way to charge a low battery. Au contrar, cycling a battery, especially cycling it into a deep discharge mode, absolutely is a major factor in it's expected life time. Automotive lead-acid batteries do not recover well from deep discharge events. Take almost any new conventional battery and run it through twenty cycles of 90% discharge followed by full recharge. Most will be dead by the end of such a torture test.
John
|
| flobert | 28 Jul 2005 16:27 |
>> Is it normal for the battery to fail load test >> at only 36K? Batteries are not engine componants, they work by time, and not miles. Was the battery topped up?
>That really depends on the climate. When I lived in Phoenix I never had a >battery survive three summers - they would almost always give up early in >the third summer (like around May, since summer there is pretty much >May-September, and it's hit 100 degrees in March.) Now I live in Flagstaff >and the only battery I've had to replace in 4 years was in a car we had >recently bought. Did you let the car run for a little before turning the AC on, and similarly turn the AC off a little bit before you turned the engine off in Az? if not, thats what would have killed them.
>Other things can suck the life out of a battery, especially if they are run >down and charged by driving the car. Yes and no. The battery is designed to be chargable. using, and draining and charging the battery doesn't 'damage it' per se. If it is kept below 10V for an extended period of time (say 12 hours or more) then it is irreperably damaged. using a trickle charger is the best way to charge a low battery.
>Mike |
| Michael Pardee | 27 Jul 2005 12:49 |
> Is it normal for the battery to fail load test > at only 36K? That really depends on the climate. When I lived in Phoenix I never had a battery survive three summers - they would almost always give up early in the third summer (like around May, since summer there is pretty much May-September, and it's hit 100 degrees in March.) Now I live in Flagstaff and the only battery I've had to replace in 4 years was in a car we had recently bought.
Other things can suck the life out of a battery, especially if they are run down and charged by driving the car.
Mike
|
| ap | 25 Jul 2005 14:46 |
Hello, Recently went in for an oil change at 35K. The battery load test failed on my car even though I appear to have no starting problems.
My questions: Besides the honda battery (delphi), are there other good replacement batteries?
I'm looking at: Everready (by AC delco) $65 Energizer $60 Bosch $79 Diehard $79 (Sears)
Is it normal for the battery to fail load test at only 36K?
THANK YOU!
|
Quick links: