You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Timing belt snappage on 99 civic
| Burt S. | 28 Nov 2005 07:09 |
"TO L via CarKB.com" <u10197@uwe> wrote in message news:57f27c9286b15@uwe...
>Sounds a.s backwards to me, I told my bro-in law to suggest doing the >clearance checks on the valves as is, but the dealership told him that >wouldn't work. It seems pretty easy to check the valve clearance; even without a feeler gauge. Sounds like she needs an honest mechanic.
> What types of damage could still be hidden? I would imagine anything wrong > with the valvetrain's moving parts would make a big klacking noise. Or lower > compression on a cylinder that isn't getting a good seal on the valve seat. Head, valves, rocker arms, pistons, block and misc parts are some things to think about.
|
| T L | 26 Nov 2005 17:19 |
What types of damage could still be hidden? I would imagine anything wrong with the valvetrain's moving parts would make a big klacking noise. Or lower compression on a cylinder that isn't getting a good seal on the valve seat.
Any other ideas?
t
>> My sisters (poorly maintained) 99 civic with 165000kms has recently snapped >> the timing belt. Thought I would add some ammunition to the OEM vs nonOEM [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >*immediately.* Genuine belts can soak up oil and can last as much as a >month on a well lubricated cam. I've seen it. |
| Burt S. | 26 Nov 2005 15:05 |
> My sisters (poorly maintained) 99 civic with 165000kms has recently snapped > the timing belt. Thought I would add some ammunition to the OEM vs nonOEM [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Its not my car, so I am just doing this for info purposes. I drive a (much > better maintained) 98 civic with 236000kms on it. Just watch the idle and do a compression test. But some damages could still be hidden.
As part of my ritual, the non-genuine belt should be replace before the expected date. If there's any sign of oil on them they should be replaced *immediately.* Genuine belts can soak up oil and can last as much as a month on a well lubricated cam. I've seen it.
|
| T L | 24 Nov 2005 23:47 |
Hi All
My sisters (poorly maintained) 99 civic with 165000kms has recently snapped the timing belt. Thought I would add some ammunition to the OEM vs nonOEM parts debate.
The belt has 60000kms on it. Its made by Goodyear. Its 3 years old. We are located in Winnipeg. And its not even cold yet.
Not only did it possibly ruin the valve train, it took the lower timing cover and the CYL Crank Angle sensor with it. (And they want to charge $300 for the sensor alone!) Total bill to put it back together = $700 at the dealership. Then we get to crank it over and see if the valves are bent.
Sounds a.s backwards to me, I told my bro-in law to suggest doing the clearance checks on the valves as is, but the dealership told him that wouldn't work.
Any ideas out there regarding this? Also does 3 bills for that sensor sound right? What about the valve clearance check?
Its not my car, so I am just doing this for info purposes. I drive a (much better maintained) 98 civic with 236000kms on it.
Thanks in advance. t
|
Quick links: