You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Turning Rotors: a case study...
| Stephen H | 16 Dec 2005 14:42 |
"jim>> Anyway my point was to show how little metal comes off during a lathe job.
> i have two points: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > i'd much rather live with a slightly scored disk than one that's been > machined wrong and is now ruined. My point is different; We do it for free with a brake job It takes about 10 minutes to do total
We have never had an issue with machining them wrong. Its to simple. But and idiot could play with the settings on the lath and screw it up... Perhaps the people who turned your rotors in the past were idiots?
I agree with pressed on rotors... What a wonderful idea someone had...
Take care,
 Signature Stephen W. Hansen ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician ASE Automobile Advanced Engine Performance ASE Undercar Specialist
http://autorepair.about.com/cs/troubleshooting/l/bl_obd_main.htm http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/
|
| jim beam | 16 Dec 2005 14:24 |
>>well, i've never had a problem with a new disk. i've had repeated >>problems with skimmed disks. you figure it out. labor and a $5k machine [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Anyway my point was to show how little metal comes off during a lathe job. i have two points:
1. it ain't cheap enough to be worth bothering with [unless it's a disk that requires complete disassembly of the hub] AND
2. the results frequently aren't good enough to be worth the trouble. in fact it often /causes/ problems.
i'd much rather live with a slightly scored disk than one that's been machined wrong and is now ruined.
|
| Stephen H | 16 Dec 2005 06:22 |
> well, i've never had a problem with a new disk. i've had repeated > problems with skimmed disks. you figure it out. labor and a $5k machine [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > no kidding. You may have had problems, and in a perfect world everyone would replace parts with new when worn with high quality stuff, but many want it done cheap.
Anyway my point was to show how little metal comes off during a lathe job.
 Signature Stephen W. Hansen ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician ASE Automobile Advanced Engine Performance ASE Undercar Specialist
http://autorepair.about.com/cs/troubleshooting/l/bl_obd_main.htm http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/
|
| jim beam | 16 Dec 2005 03:24 |
>>>With all of the debate about turning rotors I thought I'd do a bit of >>>measuring and documenting while doing a brake job. Here is my results. [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] > concerned. But by just removing the tire and rotor you can effect the > bearing to rotor play if a small piece of dirt were to fall between them. ok, so now let's /cut/ a disk with a piece of dirt under the rotor. now we have a disk that is perfectly planar with respect to the dirt, not the mounting. and that causes brake judder.
> In > fact, how do you know your "new Honda replacement rotor is true to your old > wheel bearing?. well, i've never had a problem with a new disk. i've had repeated problems with skimmed disks. you figure it out. labor and a $5k machine to futz about with a part that can be replaced with a flawless new disk for $50-$60 in about 10 minutes? forget it.
> We do have a 5000$ on car lathe, that is suppose to be "the > most accurate way to turn the brakes" but it broke again. (600$ was the last [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Wear of the rotor and warpage (runout) are the two biggest factors of a > brake job. no kidding.
|
| Stephen H | 15 Dec 2005 14:36 |
>> With all of the debate about turning rotors I thought I'd do a bit of >> measuring and documenting while doing a brake job. Here is my results. [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > what does measuring disk thickness tell you about how accurately the disk > was kept axial with the bearing? If this were the only factor in the performance of brakes than I would be concerned. But by just removing the tire and rotor you can effect the bearing to rotor play if a small piece of dirt were to fall between them. In fact, how do you know your "new Honda replacement rotor is true to your old wheel bearing?. We do have a 5000$ on car lathe, that is suppose to be "the most accurate way to turn the brakes" but it broke again. (600$ was the last repair bill) and having a brother-in law that is a machinist, we can see no great advantage to turning it on the car of off, as long as the turn job is true.
Wear of the rotor and warpage (runout) are the two biggest factors of a brake job.
 Signature Stephen W. Hansen ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician ASE Automobile Advanced Engine Performance ASE Undercar Specialist
http://autorepair.about.com/cs/troubleshooting/l/bl_obd_main.htm http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/
|
| jim beam | 15 Dec 2005 07:06 |
> With all of the debate about turning rotors I thought I'd do a bit of > measuring and documenting while doing a brake job. Here is my results. [quoted text clipped - 37 lines] > in the time between brake jobs by the pads than on a simple clean up on a > lath. what does measuring disk thickness tell you about how accurately the disk was kept axial with the bearing?
|
| Stephen H | 15 Dec 2005 04:48 |
With all of the debate about turning rotors I thought I'd do a bit of measuring and documenting while doing a brake job. Here is my results.
The car 1987(?) Honda accord; poor shape, 200,000K no brakes due to a ruptured line. This soaked the pads and as per MAP standards required new pads. Now disregarding the brake line (and the springs off in the right read drum that he couldn't afford to repair) the car would appear as a prime candidate for a DIY brake job in the front driveway. Both rotors had no major grooves, very small ridge> I could picture this as a easy pad slap.
Now ASE standards have you measure several different angles to determine if a re-cut is needed. We concentrate on the warpage factor. I don't feel like buying a few hundred dollars more of measuring tools to tell me what one pass on a lathe will tell me.
The right front rotor measured at .747 to start I took one pass at .002 on each side Final measurement was .742
The left front rotor measured at .697 on the outside edge and .703 at the inside edge to start I took one pass at .002 on each side. the start of the cut was heavy, I thought I'd have to do a second cut. Often we will see the O/S edge a wee bit thinner than the inside edge, but when I returned to the lath one cut was all that was needed. Final measurement was .696
I forgot to write it down, but discard was in the .660 range.
Most people who do brakes at home won't measure the rotors and it was interesting to see the big difference in specs from the left to the right to start. We thought there would be at least one new rotor needed, but specs are specs.
You can see by the measurements that the lath action took off very little metal, not enough to make a difference on heat dissipation, but the little work guaranteed me that this car (the POS it was) had decent front brakes when he left. This is why I turn rotors every time. In the big picture, more metal is lost in the time between brake jobs by the pads than on a simple clean up on a lath.
 Signature Stephen W. Hansen ASE Certified Master Automobile Technician ASE Automobile Advanced Engine Performance ASE Undercar Specialist
http://autorepair.about.com/cs/troubleshooting/l/bl_obd_main.htm http://www.troublecodes.net/technical/
|
Quick links: