Re: Toyolet prius efficiency
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Toyolet prius efficiency
| isquat@gmail.com | 28 Mar 2007 04:54 |
On Mar 27, 7:45 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 23, 4:11 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com> > >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > Why not sneer at Corolla owners or Civic DX owners or owners of > whatever sh.t boxes GM, Ford and Chrysler are selling now. I don't sneer at Civic DX owners. Aside from the lack of A/C that people in some climates don't need there is nothing to sneer at. Stick a hybrid powertrain in it and it's still a decent car. Yep, corolla is a different story though. At about 85+ mph the steering calibration and testing just was not performed. Nothing is wrong with PT cruiser. I just prefer BARs over Tommy submachine guns.
> Oh, don't get me wrong. There are a hell of a lot of cars that would > be more fun for less money, but the Tesla would still be fun (when it > is running.) I'm sure it will be a fun city car for people who don't keep a habit of running out of gas, er, charge.
> >??? If I compared it to G35/Z350 you would've discounted > >my comparison less? > > Uh, no. You are still comparing cars that cost $10K more. In the > case of the Z car you are comparing a $33K sports car to a $23K green > family car. Does that sound like a reasonable comparison to you? Yes. Bottom line z350 cost $27k and wrx cost about $23. To me both are fine family cars if you keep inlaws in shape. Nevermind the 08 wrx. prius looks prettier than that :-[
> That explains a lot. Automotive enthusiasm is not your problem. > Superficiality may be. It is fine to enjoy high performance and/or > luxury in an automobile. It is more than a bit tacky to look down on > people because they can't afford an expensive car or simply value > different things in a car than you do. I don't look down on people who can't afford expensive cars. I look down on people who are buying cars that, as a whole, are a piece of junk even though there are much better choices for thousands less. But I guess you are partially right. No contest.
|
| Gordon McGrew | 28 Mar 2007 03:45 |
>On Mar 23, 4:11 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >among other things. The Prius being the latter and Tesla/BMW >being the former. What you are talking about is a performance car versus a family car. The BMW is a reasonable substitute for a Prius if you have the money and want to spend it on a car. The Tesla is a toy, and a pretty expensive one at that. For the price, there are a lot of other toys that I would rather own.
Face it, some people either can't afford a BMW or simply don't care about performance and luxury enough to fork over the extra cash. But even if you enjoy sneering at such people, why pick on Prius owners. Why not sneer at Corolla owners or Civic DX owners or owners of whatever sh.t boxes GM, Ford and Chrysler are selling now.
>> By all accounts, the Tesla is not a boring piece of sh.t. My personal >> guess is that it will be an exciting piece of sh.t, assuming you can [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >amount of money you spent on the 500lbs heavier car. >Tesla is a no contender. It's too heavy. Oh, don't get me wrong. There are a hell of a lot of cars that would be more fun for less money, but the Tesla would still be fun (when it is running.)
>> Isn't it a little stupid to be comparing the Prius to a car (BMW 328) >> that costs 50% more? Not to mention that the Prius will be far [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >??? If I compared it to G35/Z350 you would've discounted >my comparison less? Uh, no. You are still comparing cars that cost $10K more. In the case of the Z car you are comparing a $33K sports car to a $23K green family car. Does that sound like a reasonable comparison to you?
>> For most buyers, the Prius would be the best choice by far over either >> of these other cars. The Tesla will be wildly impractical. The BMW [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >pace of life of the mide west. Maybe I should relocate to cure >my authomotive enthusiasm. That explains a lot. Automotive enthusiasm is not your problem. Superficiality may be. It is fine to enjoy high performance and/or luxury in an automobile. It is more than a bit tacky to look down on people because they can't afford an expensive car or simply value different things in a car than you do.
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 26 Mar 2007 08:14 |
On Mar 23, 4:11 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com> wrote:
the goddamn creation of the google braniacs lost my rant about the shittiness of the Echo platform later stretched into the modern day Prius here. Who wrote that composer widget??? Same guy who designed Echo?
> Argument by meandering non sequitur? Are we talking about Prius, > Tesla or BMW? We are talking about a car versus a transportation implement among other things. The Prius being the latter and Tesla/BMW being the former.
> By all accounts, the Tesla is not a boring piece of sh.t. My personal > guess is that it will be an exciting piece of sh.t, assuming you can > get it somewhere fun to drive it without drastically depleting the > batteries. Buy a trailer and a pickup to haul it to the track. Where people in Elise/Exige would smoke you, get into an accident, fix the front end, crash again and buy another Elise for the amount of money you spent on the 500lbs heavier car. Tesla is a no contender. It's too heavy.
> Isn't it a little stupid to be comparing the Prius to a car (BMW 328) > that costs 50% more? Not to mention that the Prius will be far > cheaper to operate. The BMW will have much more luxury and > performance, but you will pay a lot for it, probably twice as much. ??? If I compared it to G35/Z350 you would've discounted my comparison less?
> For most buyers, the Prius would be the best choice by far over either > of these other cars. The Tesla will be wildly impractical. The BMW > is mostly a status symbol. Not that it isn't fun to drive and > modestly luxurious, but most buyers don't know what to do with the > performance and equivalent luxury could be had in a far less finicky > (and somewhat less expensive) Japanese car. It's a pity but you might be right. I leave in the ubercompetitive part of california and forget that there are places with the pace of life of the mide west. Maybe I should relocate to cure my authomotive enthusiasm.
|
| Gordon McGrew | 24 Mar 2007 00:11 |
>On Mar 22, 8:49 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >It was a piece of junk when it came out. >The only notable part is the hybrid power train. Certainly the most notable aspect of the car, but it is otherwise a competent family vehicle. Comfortable and reliable.
>Remove that and you are left with an obviously shitty platform. Why?
>> As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or >> so. Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Taxis and mail delivery: maybe. I don't see what use >there is to the general public. General transportation with excellent fuel economy. What's wrong with that?
>> >I don't like rebooting my cars a few times >> >a day, but that might just be me silly. >> >> Rebooting? > >http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html Modified early production Prius being run in an unorthodox manner at the Bonneville salt flats. This may have been related to the recall problem discussed below. I don't recall any automotive reviews or owner reports mentioning this as a problem, at least since the recall was completed.
>> > I wonder if the same >> >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Design defects? You mean aside from being a boring piece of sh.t? As If you want to rant about boring pieces of sh.t, why don't you pick on the Dodge Caravan? The Prius doesn't have the performance I would personally prefer, but it is interesting in its unconventional operation.
>for production defects there are plenty: >http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/9565/software-problem-affects-some- toyota-prius-hybrids.html >http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/10194/toyota-recalls-prius-hybrids.html >if you google enough you'd find a bit more with the older >Echo based crappola. So, the car had a recall. Lots of cars have recalls. Why pick on this one? The Prius has an excellent reliability record.
The old model wasn't as good as the new one in many respects, but it is still more reliable than just about anything that isn't a Toyota or Honda product.
>> > Someone is going to buy that fat pig >> >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Same buggy electrical system I suppose. I doubt it. The Tesla is pure electric. Why would its electrical system have anything to do with a Prius. Other than the glitch with the recalled 04/05s (which have all been fixed by now), what Prius bugs are you referring to? Be specific.
>Too early to tell, >but judging by the delayed shipment of the first ones >they had serious problems going into production even >with the helping hand of Lotus. In all fairness the first >crop of bmw 3xx had their share of electrical problems also. >The problem is: prius is not half the car beemer is. Argument by meandering non sequitur? Are we talking about Prius, Tesla or BMW?
By all accounts, the Tesla is not a boring piece of sh.t. My personal guess is that it will be an exciting piece of sh.t, assuming you can get it somewhere fun to drive it without drastically depleting the batteries. Buy a trailer and a pickup to haul it to the track.
Isn't it a little stupid to be comparing the Prius to a car (BMW 328) that costs 50% more? Not to mention that the Prius will be far cheaper to operate. The BMW will have much more luxury and performance, but you will pay a lot for it, probably twice as much.
For most buyers, the Prius would be the best choice by far over either of these other cars. The Tesla will be wildly impractical. The BMW is mostly a status symbol. Not that it isn't fun to drive and modestly luxurious, but most buyers don't know what to do with the performance and equivalent luxury could be had in a far less finicky (and somewhat less expensive) Japanese car.
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 23 Mar 2007 17:36 |
On Mar 22, 8:49 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee" > >> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge > technology for the next 50 years? It was a piece of junk when it came out. The only notable part is the hybrid power train. Remove that and you are left with an obviously shitty platform.
> As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or > so. Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a > television until then because they had tube technology? Tubes have their place in high end audio. Just like the prius: niche technology adopted far wider than it should have been. Taxis and mail delivery: maybe. I don't see what use there is to the general public.
> >I don't like rebooting my cars a few times > >a day, but that might just be me silly. > > Rebooting? http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html
> > I wonder if the same > >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise > >or Tesla has a simpler system. > > What problems? I have not hard of any serious design defects with the > Prius. Design defects? You mean aside from being a boring piece of sh.t? As for production defects there are plenty: http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/9565/software-problem-affects-some- toyota-prius-hybrids.html http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/10194/toyota-recalls-prius-hybrids.html if you google enough you'd find a bit more with the older Echo based crappola.
> > Someone is going to buy that fat pig > >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds > >or so shaved for the rest of the population. > > What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius? Same buggy electrical system I suppose. Too early to tell, but judging by the delayed shipment of the first ones they had serious problems going into production even with the helping hand of Lotus. In all fairness the first crop of bmw 3xx had their share of electrical problems also. The problem is: prius is not half the car beemer is.
|
| Gordon McGrew | 23 Mar 2007 04:49 |
>On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee" >> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors >> became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world. >> >Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the >early 21st century. Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge technology for the next 50 years?
As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or so. Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a television until then because they had tube technology?
>I don't like rebooting my cars a few times >a day, but that might just be me silly. Rebooting?
> I wonder if the same >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise >or Tesla has a simpler system. What problems? I have not hard of any serious design defects with the Prius.
> Someone is going to buy that fat pig >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds >or so shaved for the rest of the population. What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius?
>> Response: Prius >> isn't a subcompact <snip> > >That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted >it down with the nickel anchor. ??? The current Prius was designed for the ground up to be a mid-size hybrid car.
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 22 Mar 2007 06:35 |
On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors > became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world. Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the early 21st century. I don't like rebooting my cars a few times a day, but that might just be me silly. I wonder if the same problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise or Tesla has a simpler system. Someone is going to buy that fat pig anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds or so shaved for the rest of the population.
> Response: Prius > isn't a subcompact <snip> That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted it down with the nickel anchor.
|
| Michael Pardee | 22 Mar 2007 01:51 |
> http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html > > maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after > all and Ed Markey would finally shut up? > Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol? Wow - that screwy story is being quoted all over the place. It's hard to know where to start with what's wrong with it, but a bit of checking into the history and current status of that nickle plant in Ontario should clarify just how bogus the story is. After that, consider how miniscule the fraction of nickle output that goes into Prius batteries is and the ludicrous assertion that the expected life of a hybrid is 100K miles (mine had more than that when I bought it, and it drives like new)....
Don't worry, though. You probably won't be forced into buying a hybrid anytime soon. When conventional power trains can't compete in either power or efficiency, your choices may be limited, but I bet you could still buy a 20th century car even 30 years from now. Maybe even one with 4-wheel drum brakes and recirculating ball steering and a Kettering ignition.
When I was a kid fascinated by electronics, the limitations and cost and complexity of transistors spawned pronouncements that transistors would never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.
Mike
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 21 Mar 2007 22:16 |
http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html
maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after all and Ed Markey would finally shut up? Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol?
|
Quick links:
|
|
|