Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: Toyolet prius efficiency

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Toyolet prius efficiency

Gordon McGrew24 Mar 2007 00:11
>On Mar 22, 8:49 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>It was a piece of junk when it came out.
>The only notable part is the hybrid power train.

Certainly the most notable aspect of the car, but it is otherwise a
competent family vehicle.  Comfortable and reliable.  

>Remove that and you are left with an obviously shitty platform.

Why?

>> As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or
>> so.  Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Taxis and mail delivery: maybe. I don't see what use
>there is to the general public.

General transportation with excellent fuel economy.  What's wrong with
that?

>> >I don't like rebooting my cars a few times
>> >a day, but that might just be me silly.
>>
>> Rebooting?
>
>http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html

Modified early production Prius being run in an unorthodox manner at
the Bonneville salt flats.  This may have been related to the recall
problem discussed below.  I don't recall any automotive reviews or
owner reports mentioning this as a problem, at least since the recall
was completed.

>> > I wonder if the same
>> >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Design defects? You mean aside from being a boring piece of sh.t? As

If you want to rant about boring pieces of sh.t, why don't you pick on
the Dodge Caravan?  The Prius doesn't have the performance I would
personally prefer, but it is interesting in its unconventional
operation.  

>for production defects there are plenty:
>http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/9565/software-problem-affects-some-
toyota-prius-hybrids.html

>http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/10194/toyota-recalls-prius-hybrids.html
>if you google enough you'd find a bit more with the older
>Echo based crappola.

So, the car had a recall.  Lots of cars have recalls.  Why pick on
this one?  The Prius has an excellent reliability record.

The old model wasn't as good as the new one in many respects, but it
is still more reliable than just about anything that isn't a Toyota or
Honda product.

>> > Someone is going to buy that fat pig
>> >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Same buggy electrical system I suppose.

I doubt it.  The Tesla is pure electric.  Why would its electrical
system have anything to do with a Prius.  Other than the glitch with
the recalled 04/05s (which have all been fixed by now), what Prius
bugs are you referring to?  Be specific.

>Too early to tell,
>but judging by the delayed shipment of the first ones
>they had serious problems going into production even
>with the helping hand of Lotus. In all fairness the first
>crop of bmw 3xx had their share of electrical problems also.
>The problem is: prius is not half the car beemer is.

Argument by meandering non sequitur?  Are we talking about Prius,
Tesla or BMW?

By all accounts, the Tesla is not a boring piece of sh.t.  My personal
guess is that it will be an exciting piece of sh.t, assuming you can
get it somewhere fun to drive it without drastically depleting the
batteries.  Buy a trailer and a pickup to haul it to the track.

Isn't it a little stupid to be comparing the Prius to a car (BMW 328)
that costs 50% more?  Not to mention that the Prius will be far
cheaper to operate.  The BMW will have much more luxury and
performance, but you will pay a lot for it, probably twice as much.

For most buyers, the Prius would be the best choice by far over either
of these other cars.  The Tesla will be wildly impractical.  The BMW
is mostly a status symbol.  Not that it isn't fun to drive and
modestly luxurious, but most buyers don't know what to do with the
performance and equivalent luxury could be had in a far less finicky
(and somewhat less expensive) Japanese car.

isquat@gmail.com23 Mar 2007 17:36
On Mar 22, 8:49 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com>
wrote:

> >On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
> >> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge
> technology for the next 50 years?

It was a piece of junk when it came out.
The only notable part is the hybrid power train.
Remove that and you are left with an obviously shitty platform.

> As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or
> so.  Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a
> television until then because they had tube technology?

Tubes have their place in high end audio. Just like the prius:
niche technology adopted far wider than it should have been.
Taxis and mail delivery: maybe. I don't see what use
there is to the general public.

> >I don't like rebooting my cars a few times
> >a day, but that might just be me silly.
>
> Rebooting?

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html

> > I wonder if the same
> >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise
> >or Tesla has a simpler system.
>
> What problems?  I have not hard of any serious design defects with the
> Prius.

Design defects? You mean aside from being a boring piece of sh.t? As
for production defects there are plenty:
http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/9565/software-problem-affects-some-
toyota-prius-hybrids.html

http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/10194/toyota-recalls-prius-hybrids.html
if you google enough you'd find a bit more with the older
Echo based crappola.

> > Someone is going to buy that fat pig
> >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds
> >or so shaved for the rest of the population.
>
> What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius?

Same buggy electrical system I suppose. Too early to tell,
but judging by the delayed shipment of the first ones
they had serious problems going into production even
with the helping hand of Lotus. In all fairness the first
crop of bmw 3xx had their share of electrical problems also.
The problem is: prius is not half the car beemer is.

Gordon McGrew23 Mar 2007 04:49
>On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
>> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
>> became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.
>>
>Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the
>early 21st century.

Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge
technology for the next 50 years?

As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or
so.  Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a
television until then because they had tube technology?

>I don't like rebooting my cars a few times
>a day, but that might just be me silly.

Rebooting?

> I wonder if the same
>problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise
>or Tesla has a simpler system.

What problems?  I have not hard of any serious design defects with the
Prius.  

> Someone is going to buy that fat pig
>anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds
>or so shaved for the rest of the population.

What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius?

>> Response:  Prius
>> isn't a subcompact <snip>
>
>That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted
>it down with the nickel anchor.

???  The current Prius was designed for the ground up to be a mid-size
hybrid car.

isquat@gmail.com22 Mar 2007 06:35
On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
> became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.

Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the
early 21st century. I don't like rebooting my cars a few times
a day, but that might just be me silly. I wonder if the same
problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise
or Tesla has a simpler system. Someone is going to buy that fat pig
anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds
or so shaved for the rest of the population.

> Response:  Prius
> isn't a subcompact <snip>

That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted
it down with the nickel anchor.

Michael Pardee22 Mar 2007 01:51
> http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html
>
> maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after
> all and Ed Markey would finally shut up?
> Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol?

Wow - that screwy story is being quoted all over the place. It's hard to
know where to start with what's wrong with it, but a bit of checking into
the history and current status of that nickle plant in Ontario should
clarify just how bogus the story is. After that, consider how miniscule the
fraction of nickle output that goes into Prius batteries is and the
ludicrous assertion that the expected life of a hybrid is 100K miles (mine
had more than that when I bought it, and it drives like new)....

Don't worry, though. You probably won't be forced into buying a hybrid
anytime soon. When conventional power trains can't compete in either power
or efficiency, your choices may be limited, but I bet you could still buy a
20th century car even 30 years from now. Maybe even one with 4-wheel drum
brakes and recirculating ball steering and a Kettering ignition.

When I was a kid fascinated by electronics, the limitations and cost and
complexity of transistors spawned pronouncements that transistors would
never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.

Mike

isquat@gmail.com21 Mar 2007 22:16
http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html

maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after
all and Ed Markey would finally shut up?
Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol?

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.