Re: Toyolet prius efficiency
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Toyolet prius efficiency
| Michael Pardee | 28 Mar 2007 23:27 |
> On Mar 27, 4:47 am, "Michael Pardee" <michaeltn...@cybertrails.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > noise drowns the engine noise unless you have a fart can > for exhaust I guess. Very unlikely on Prius :-] (Disclaimer - I have the sedan, not the hatchback.) The suspension is typical of family cars of the same dimensions. The wind noise is not bad at all; rather, road noise is mostly what the passengers hear. I had some Pirellis on it that made a weird "flying saucer" noise on smooth pavement. In town it is very hard to tell when the engine starts and stops, except for the odd occasion when the engine lurches when it shuts down.
> to place the >> jack. Now every owner who ignores the manual will suffer, and a lot worse [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Anyhow, that was just a one off car purpose built > i don't suppose you have to do the same in yours. I'm not sure I follow you there, but the sedan version of the Prius is more conventional in starting. Like any other auto tranny car, the "shifter" (more properly, "mode selector") is left in Park and the driver puts his foot on the brake while starting and while shifting into gear. IIRC the new model, the hatchback, requires the car to be started with the brake depressed. The version I have doesn't.
Mike
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 27 Mar 2007 16:34 |
On Mar 27, 4:47 am, "Michael Pardee" <michaeltn...@cybertrails.com> wrote:
> <isq...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > don't RTFM too often come here because they didn't know they were supposed > to change their timing belts or use only Honda fluids in their AT or PS. For maintenance, yes it makes sense.
> I guess you are a baby-boomer like me, and remember when an owner's manual > was only to tell you where the switches and fuses were, or how Not really. mid 30s. If I were older I might have appreciated the softly sprung suspension and intermittently noiseless operation while in the city. On the highway it's useless naturally since the wind noise drowns the engine noise unless you have a fart can for exhaust I guess. Very unlikely on Prius :-]
to place the
> jack. Now every owner who ignores the manual will suffer, and a lot worse > than not knowing how to start the car! Evasive maneuvers, eh? Anyhow, that was just a one off car purpose built i don't suppose you have to do the same in yours.
|
| Michael Pardee | 27 Mar 2007 12:47 |
> Behold, finally there is a car where a driver MUST study > the manual before driving. Isn't that an achievement. You've probably noticed there is a strong current of RTFM here. People who don't RTFM too often come here because they didn't know they were supposed to change their timing belts or use only Honda fluids in their AT or PS.
I guess you are a baby-boomer like me, and remember when an owner's manual was only to tell you where the switches and fuses were, or how to place the jack. Now every owner who ignores the manual will suffer, and a lot worse than not knowing how to start the car!
Mike
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 26 Mar 2007 08:15 |
On Mar 23, 5:27 pm, "Michael Pardee" <michaeltn...@cybertrails.com> wrote:
> <isq...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > He would have saved himself embarrassment if he had RTFM. Can't fault the > car for the driver's error. Behold, finally there is a car where a driver MUST study the manual before driving. Isn't that an achievement.
|
| Michael Pardee | 24 Mar 2007 01:27 |
> http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html He would have saved himself embarrassment if he had RTFM. Can't fault the car for the driver's error.
Mike
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 23 Mar 2007 17:36 |
On Mar 22, 8:49 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee" > >> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge > technology for the next 50 years? It was a piece of junk when it came out. The only notable part is the hybrid power train. Remove that and you are left with an obviously shitty platform.
> As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or > so. Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a > television until then because they had tube technology? Tubes have their place in high end audio. Just like the prius: niche technology adopted far wider than it should have been. Taxis and mail delivery: maybe. I don't see what use there is to the general public.
> >I don't like rebooting my cars a few times > >a day, but that might just be me silly. > > Rebooting? http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html
> > I wonder if the same > >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise > >or Tesla has a simpler system. > > What problems? I have not hard of any serious design defects with the > Prius. Design defects? You mean aside from being a boring piece of sh.t? As for production defects there are plenty: http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/9565/software-problem-affects-some- toyota-prius-hybrids.html http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/10194/toyota-recalls-prius-hybrids.html if you google enough you'd find a bit more with the older Echo based crappola.
> > Someone is going to buy that fat pig > >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds > >or so shaved for the rest of the population. > > What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius? Same buggy electrical system I suppose. Too early to tell, but judging by the delayed shipment of the first ones they had serious problems going into production even with the helping hand of Lotus. In all fairness the first crop of bmw 3xx had their share of electrical problems also. The problem is: prius is not half the car beemer is.
|
| Gordon McGrew | 23 Mar 2007 04:49 |
>On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee" >> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors >> became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world. >> >Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the >early 21st century. Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge technology for the next 50 years?
As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or so. Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a television until then because they had tube technology?
>I don't like rebooting my cars a few times >a day, but that might just be me silly. Rebooting?
> I wonder if the same >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise >or Tesla has a simpler system. What problems? I have not hard of any serious design defects with the Prius.
> Someone is going to buy that fat pig >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds >or so shaved for the rest of the population. What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius?
>> Response: Prius >> isn't a subcompact <snip> > >That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted >it down with the nickel anchor. ??? The current Prius was designed for the ground up to be a mid-size hybrid car.
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 22 Mar 2007 06:35 |
On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors > became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world. Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the early 21st century. I don't like rebooting my cars a few times a day, but that might just be me silly. I wonder if the same problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise or Tesla has a simpler system. Someone is going to buy that fat pig anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds or so shaved for the rest of the population.
> Response: Prius > isn't a subcompact <snip> That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted it down with the nickel anchor.
|
| Michael Pardee | 22 Mar 2007 01:51 |
> http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html > > maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after > all and Ed Markey would finally shut up? > Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol? Wow - that screwy story is being quoted all over the place. It's hard to know where to start with what's wrong with it, but a bit of checking into the history and current status of that nickle plant in Ontario should clarify just how bogus the story is. After that, consider how miniscule the fraction of nickle output that goes into Prius batteries is and the ludicrous assertion that the expected life of a hybrid is 100K miles (mine had more than that when I bought it, and it drives like new)....
Don't worry, though. You probably won't be forced into buying a hybrid anytime soon. When conventional power trains can't compete in either power or efficiency, your choices may be limited, but I bet you could still buy a 20th century car even 30 years from now. Maybe even one with 4-wheel drum brakes and recirculating ball steering and a Kettering ignition.
When I was a kid fascinated by electronics, the limitations and cost and complexity of transistors spawned pronouncements that transistors would never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.
Mike
|
| isquat@gmail.com | 21 Mar 2007 22:16 |
http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html
maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after all and Ed Markey would finally shut up? Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol?
|
Quick links:
|
|
|