Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
HomeAnnouncements
Discussion Groups
By Brand
BMWChevroletDodgeFordGMHondaLexusMercedes-BenzNissanPeugeotToyotaVolkswagenOther Brands
By Topic
4x4 CarsRVsDrivingMaintenance & RepairCar AudioCollectible Cars
Country Specific
Australian ForumsUK Forums
ArticlesAuto InsuranceBuyingCars & TechnologyMaintenanceMiscellaneousSafety
DMV Resources
Related Topics
MotorcyclesBoatsMore Topics ...

Re: Toyolet prius efficiency

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free CarKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: Toyolet prius efficiency

Michael Pardee27 Mar 2007 12:47
> Behold, finally there is a car where a driver MUST study
> the manual before driving. Isn't that an achievement.

You've probably noticed there is a strong current of RTFM here. People who
don't RTFM too often come here because they didn't know they were supposed
to change their timing belts or use only Honda fluids in their AT or PS.

I guess you are a baby-boomer like me, and remember when an owner's manual
was only to tell you where the switches and fuses were, or how to place the
jack. Now every owner who ignores the manual will suffer, and a lot worse
than not knowing how to start the car!

Mike

isquat@gmail.com26 Mar 2007 08:15
On Mar 23, 5:27 pm, "Michael Pardee" <michaeltn...@cybertrails.com>
wrote:
> <isq...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> He would have saved himself embarrassment if he had RTFM. Can't fault the
> car for the driver's error.

Behold, finally there is a car where a driver MUST study
the manual before driving. Isn't that an achievement.

Michael Pardee24 Mar 2007 01:27
> http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html

He would have saved himself embarrassment if he had RTFM. Can't fault the
car for the driver's error.

Mike

isquat@gmail.com23 Mar 2007 17:36
On Mar 22, 8:49 pm, Gordon McGrew <RgEmMcOgVr...@mindspring.com>
wrote:

> >On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
> >> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge
> technology for the next 50 years?

It was a piece of junk when it came out.
The only notable part is the hybrid power train.
Remove that and you are left with an obviously shitty platform.

> As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or
> so.  Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a
> television until then because they had tube technology?

Tubes have their place in high end audio. Just like the prius:
niche technology adopted far wider than it should have been.
Taxis and mail delivery: maybe. I don't see what use
there is to the general public.

> >I don't like rebooting my cars a few times
> >a day, but that might just be me silly.
>
> Rebooting?

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/8695/sport-got-hybrid.html

> > I wonder if the same
> >problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise
> >or Tesla has a simpler system.
>
> What problems?  I have not hard of any serious design defects with the
> Prius.

Design defects? You mean aside from being a boring piece of sh.t? As
for production defects there are plenty:
http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/9565/software-problem-affects-some-
toyota-prius-hybrids.html

http://www.caranddriver.com/dailyautoinsider/10194/toyota-recalls-prius-hybrids.html
if you google enough you'd find a bit more with the older
Echo based crappola.

> > Someone is going to buy that fat pig
> >anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds
> >or so shaved for the rest of the population.
>
> What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius?

Same buggy electrical system I suppose. Too early to tell,
but judging by the delayed shipment of the first ones
they had serious problems going into production even
with the helping hand of Lotus. In all fairness the first
crop of bmw 3xx had their share of electrical problems also.
The problem is: prius is not half the car beemer is.

Gordon McGrew23 Mar 2007 04:49
>On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
>> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
>> became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.
>>
>Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the
>early 21st century.

Is someone claiming that the 2007 Prius will be cutting edge
technology for the next 50 years?

As for vacuum tubes, most televisions had them up until the 1980s or
so.  Assuming you are old enough, did you postpone purchasing a
television until then because they had tube technology?

>I don't like rebooting my cars a few times
>a day, but that might just be me silly.

Rebooting?

> I wonder if the same
>problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise
>or Tesla has a simpler system.

What problems?  I have not hard of any serious design defects with the
Prius.  

> Someone is going to buy that fat pig
>anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds
>or so shaved for the rest of the population.

What does the Tesla have to do with the Prius?

>> Response:  Prius
>> isn't a subcompact <snip>
>
>That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted
>it down with the nickel anchor.

???  The current Prius was designed for the ground up to be a mid-size
hybrid car.

isquat@gmail.com22 Mar 2007 06:35
On Mar 21, 5:51 pm, "Michael Pardee"
> never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
> became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.

Exacltly. Prius will be remembered at the vacuum tubes of the
early 21st century. I don't like rebooting my cars a few times
a day, but that might just be me silly. I wonder if the same
problems are delaying the production of the bastardized Elise
or Tesla has a simpler system. Someone is going to buy that fat pig
anyhow. There is Exige for half the price with 500 pounds
or so shaved for the rest of the population.

> Response:  Prius
> isn't a subcompact <snip>

That's how it's life began before Toyoda knitting corporation weighted
it down with the nickel anchor.

Michael Pardee22 Mar 2007 01:51
> http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html
>
> maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after
> all and Ed Markey would finally shut up?
> Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol?

Wow - that screwy story is being quoted all over the place. It's hard to
know where to start with what's wrong with it, but a bit of checking into
the history and current status of that nickle plant in Ontario should
clarify just how bogus the story is. After that, consider how miniscule the
fraction of nickle output that goes into Prius batteries is and the
ludicrous assertion that the expected life of a hybrid is 100K miles (mine
had more than that when I bought it, and it drives like new)....

Don't worry, though. You probably won't be forced into buying a hybrid
anytime soon. When conventional power trains can't compete in either power
or efficiency, your choices may be limited, but I bet you could still buy a
20th century car even 30 years from now. Maybe even one with 4-wheel drum
brakes and recirculating ball steering and a Kettering ignition.

When I was a kid fascinated by electronics, the limitations and cost and
complexity of transistors spawned pronouncements that transistors would
never replace tubes. I knew tubes were finally doomed when transistors
became cheaper than tube sockets. Funny what technology does to our world.

Mike

isquat@gmail.com21 Mar 2007 22:16
http://omidr.typepad.com/torque/2007/03/toyotas_prius_i.html

maybe fewer hybrid crap will be forced on our shoulders after
all and Ed Markey would finally shut up?
Did Canada sign Kyoto protocol?

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.