Re: Elantra Scangauge city mileage update
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Elantra Scangauge city mileage update
| Brian Nystrom | 15 Sep 2007 19:04 |
> Well, the one true trip I took that needed a fill-up off the interstate was > right at 40 mpg. And the Scangauge in instant mileage mode hovers right at > that rate on level ground (plenty where I live) at 65 - 70. Any faster and > it heads down into high 30 figures you note. So it seems to be fairly > accurate so far, albeit based on that one trip. If you're not filling up at the same pump or at least averaging the mileage over several fill-ups, you may get abnormal readings, since the shut-off setting on pumps varies considerably. Additionally, if a trip is one way, it can be affected by wind and terrain. 40 mpg is beyond what the Elantra is capable of averaging at normal highway speeds, though people who drive long distances at ~50 mph have seen that kind of mileage.
|
| unkadunk | 15 Sep 2007 17:45 |
........
> With that little gas used, trip computers are not very accurate. It > could easily be off by several mpg in either direction. ..........
>> Normally it's a mixture of freeway and town, which puts it around 26 >> to 27, but this stint of stop and go really takes it's toll. The [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > 40? Not likely. Something in the range of 36, perhaps 37 is more like > it, provided that you drive reasonably. Well, the one true trip I took that needed a fill-up off the interstate was right at 40 mpg. And the Scangauge in instant mileage mode hovers right at that rate on level ground (plenty where I live) at 65 - 70. Any faster and it heads down into high 30 figures you note. So it seems to be fairly accurate so far, albeit based on that one trip.
>> But still impressively low I think. > > What's impressive about low mileage? I admit my verbiage incompetence. -Depressingly- low enough to make me look at the Prius web pages in envy. And halfway seriousness. Double city mileage is serious stuff (to me). Long term payoff or not.
|
| Brian Nystrom | 15 Sep 2007 15:20 |
> Well, the Scangauge I bought is working great, and I thought I'd share the > new tank of gas mileage with the group. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > At this point with close to half a tank used, 22.5 mpg. And still very > slowly dropping. With that little gas used, trip computers are not very accurate. It could easily be off by several mpg in either direction.
> Frowny face. Shutting off your engine at lights will help significantly.
> Normally it's a mixture of freeway and town, which puts it around 26 to 27, > but this stint of stop and go really takes it's toll. The good part is > that I know it will get around 40 on the road, which makes it a little > better. 40? Not likely. Something in the range of 36, perhaps 37 is more like it, provided that you drive reasonably.
> But still impressively low I think. What's impressive about low mileage?
|
| unkadunk | 15 Sep 2007 14:24 |
Well, the Scangauge I bought is working great, and I thought I'd share the new tank of gas mileage with the group.
In -pure- city driving, and we're talking not any free speed length of more than a quarter mile, ninety percent on stop and go with lights and stopsigns every two or three blocks. But decent slow driving.
At this point with close to half a tank used, 22.5 mpg. And still very slowly dropping.
Frowny face.
Normally it's a mixture of freeway and town, which puts it around 26 to 27, but this stint of stop and go really takes it's toll. The good part is that I know it will get around 40 on the road, which makes it a little better.
But still impressively low I think.
|
Quick links:
|
|
|