Re: 1964 GT HAWK R2 mint original car for sale
You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free CarKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: 1964 GT HAWK R2 mint original car for sale
| Bob | 29 Mar 2008 02:10 |
> > I agree, the trick is to find just the guy that prefers a nice > > survivor to a trailer queen. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Anyone who would like to discuss this car directly can call me at > 519-927-3966 or Skype: bob.shapton This car is now SOLD.
|
| Bob | 08 Mar 2008 17:21 |
> I agree, the trick is to find just the guy that prefers a nice > survivor to a trailer queen. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > hard to find and impossible to duplicate regardless of how deep one's > > pockets. Different strokes .... Anyone who would like to discuss this car directly can call me at 519-927-3966 or Skype: bob.shapton
|
| John Poulos | 06 Mar 2008 02:06 |
I agree, the trick is to find just the guy that prefers a nice survivor to a trailer queen.
>> I think what this spirited dialogue boils down to is this - > 'most' people may prefer an absolutely 'perfect' car like your green [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Bob
 Signature JP/Maryland Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/ 64 R2 GT Hawk 63 R2 GT Hawk 63 Lark 2 door 57 Wagon 51 Commander 39 Coupe Express 39 Coupe Express (body)
|
| Bob | 06 Mar 2008 01:27 |
> Not great paint > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > 39 Coupe Express > 39 Coupe Express (body) John, I was not trying to disparage your car but only paraphrasing the few shortcomings you mentioned in your listing and what I observed regarding the fit of the passenger door and trunk lid. I don't doubt it was a very nice car indeed, not a turd, and the auction showed its worth. I think what this spirited dialogue boils down to is this - 'most' people may prefer an absolutely 'perfect' car like your green '64 (I'm drooling all over my keyboard) while a very few others, myself included, appreciate a 'survivor' simply because they are SO hard to find and impossible to duplicate regardless of how deep one's pockets. Different strokes ....
Bob
|
| John Poulos | 06 Mar 2008 01:12 |
Not great paint
translation: Not much better then factory, but a 5K plus clear/coat color coat
Poor fitting panels
translation: I have no idea what you are talking about unless it was the hood which I did align.
vinyl on dash
Translation:
true, but it is the vinyl wood grain as used by the factory back in 63
No doubt your car may be nicer in some area's, but the red Hawk was not exactly a turd. maybe a condition 2. Some folks might even prefer a everything rebuilt/upgraded in the last 5000 miles car to a nice original one. I did not knock your car, just commenting on current market value.
> Have you seen and compared both cars? The red '63 is a patched up > 'restored' car with not great paint and poor fitting panels, vinyl on > dash, etc. etc. NO COMPARISON! and it still brought more than $30k ... > and about $20k more was spent on it? Good investment? I don't think > so. 1 of 9 ???? ... right, whatever.
 Signature JP/Maryland Studebaker On the Net http://stude.com My Ebay items:http://www.stude.com/EBAY/ 64 R2 GT Hawk 63 R2 GT Hawk 63 Lark 2 door 57 Wagon 51 Commander 39 Coupe Express 39 Coupe Express (body)
|
| Bob | 05 Mar 2008 22:25 |
On Mar 5, 12:57 pm, "Jerry Forrester" <forr62(no spam)@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> I just pulled a booger out of my nose. > It is a one of a kind, unrestored, unmolested, completely original and [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > -- > > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com Have you seen and compared both cars? The red '63 is a patched up 'restored' car with not great paint and poor fitting panels, vinyl on dash, etc. etc. NO COMPARISON! and it still brought more than $30k ... and about $20k more was spent on it? Good investment? I don't think so. 1 of 9 ???? ... right, whatever.
|
| Jerry Forrester | 05 Mar 2008 17:57 |
I just pulled a booger out of my nose. It is a one of a kind, unrestored, unmolested, completely original and showing no wear what so ever. Does anyone think I can get $58K for it. I doubt it. Rarity does not equate to value. <GGGGGGGGGGG>
-- thanks, Jerry Forrester check out my ebay store.... http://stores.ebay.com/CHROME-CHROME-CHROME
> >> 3,663 > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > You might want to look over this 1 of 9 '63 to get an idea of what those > cars are selling for. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=6466&viewi tem=&item=300201077577
> Lee > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
| Lee Aanderud | 05 Mar 2008 16:27 |
>> 3,663
> Hmmmm ..... that's quite a few more than the 70 R2 Hawks made in '64, > with only 24 of those being non-package cars, and who knows how many > are mint survivors. You can easily spend this much on a proper > restoration and what do you end up with? ... an unoriginal car. Good luck getting $58,000 for it... my advice is if someone offers you 50% of that, grab it and run.
You might want to look over this 1 of 9 '63 to get an idea of what those cars are selling for. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=6466&viewitem= &item=300201077577
Lee
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| Bob | 05 Mar 2008 16:19 |
> > Hmmmm .... and how many '61's were built? > > 3,663 > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com Hmmmm ..... that's quite a few more than the 70 R2 Hawks made in '64, with only 24 of those being non-package cars, and who knows how many are mint survivors. You can easily spend this much on a proper restoration and what do you end up with? ... an unoriginal car.
|
| Lee Aanderud | 05 Mar 2008 15:40 |
> Hmmmm .... and how many '61's were built? 3,663
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| Bob | 05 Mar 2008 15:13 |
> If he can get $58K for a '64, I'll have a '61 on the next day for $56K and > personally deliver it anywhere in the US. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com Hmmmm .... and how many '61's were built?
|
| Lee Aanderud | 05 Mar 2008 14:18 |
If he can get $58K for a '64, I'll have a '61 on the next day for $56K and personally deliver it anywhere in the US.
Lee
> Last year of production. All ORIGINAL - paint, interior, motor, > supercharger, etc. - and in MINT condition. 3 documented owners. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Bob
 Signature Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
| Bob | 05 Mar 2008 13:53 |
Last year of production. All ORIGINAL - paint, interior, motor, supercharger, etc. - and in MINT condition. 3 documented owners. Reluctant sale due to financial circumstances. Numbers matching car with unique one-of-a-kind history (delivered at factory as warranty replacement for defective '63 R2). Pics on request. This is a serious RARE car for a serious investor. $58,000.00
Bob
|
Quick links:
|
|
|