You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Sex and the Studebaker (Wall St Jrnl)
| rtq11@aol.com | 08 May 2008 21:47 |
I can tell you that a single bed mattress will fit beautifully into the trunk of the 1939-41 Champions. The width and length are perfect. The only problem is height. It will easliy accommodate one person lying flat but "stacking" is not possible. I have considerable experience esp. during the years 1962-67.
|
| Barry | 08 May 2008 16:09 |
Sorry, but my '39 Studebaker doesn't have a back seat... Barry'd in Studes
> In a May 8 letter to the editor commenting on "Hook-Up or Shut Up," a > review [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > deserves our thanks and respect. Anybody in the neighborhood care to call > her up and, um, offer her a ride? |
| Comatus@bex.net | 08 May 2008 12:45 |
In a May 8 letter to the editor commenting on "Hook-Up or Shut Up," a review of the book "Sex and The Soul," Wall Street Journal reader Dorothy Moore of Queens NY writes:
"...but does he really want to take the stance that students had less sex back then? Or, more believably, is it simply that academicians at that time weren't writing about the 'goings-on' in the back seats of 1939 Studebakers, and they weren't using casual, conversational terms to describe them?"
I have no brief (woohoo) on this issue. But Ms. Moore, who clearly knows her way around a 1939 Studebaker, has struck a blow for The Old Brand and deserves our thanks and respect. Anybody in the neighborhood care to call her up and, um, offer her a ride?
|
Quick links: