You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Nader running!!!
| Jeff Strickland | 25 Feb 2008 16:42 |
On Feb 24, 7:05 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <cr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> I do not pretend that he can win, but Nader himself acknowledges that
> every
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Nader's candidacy is a good thing for Republicans.
That's the only reason bush ever got "elected" in the first place
So you guys had to count on trickery
Meanwhile, oh brave bush supporter Jeffy baby, why isn't your cowardly
chickenshit chickenhawk a.s in Iraq fighting for the man you believe
in so
<JS>
Because I'm too old, they won't let me.
How come your chickenshit a.s is not fighting for your country? How come
freedom and liberty are good for you, but too good for the people of Iraq?
Why don't you want them to have what you have? After all, yoiu think I
should give all of my stuff to the central pile so it can be redistributed
to people that don't have enough.
You want to redistribute the wealth when it is safe for you to do so, but
you do not want to redistribute when things get ugly. I get it finally, you
are for conditional redistribution, where the condition is your personal
comfort.
Do not dare to question my committment to my stand until you can show that
your own stand is committed. I have no conditions on my committment.
a.shole.
You are the lowest scum in the pond, hiding behind a screen name.
</JS>
|
| bushlyed | 25 Feb 2008 10:38 |
> I do not pretend that he can win, but Nader himself acknowledges that every
> vote he gets is a vote that the Democrat candidate will not get. There's no
> chance Nader can win, and there's a very good chance he can make it so the
> Democrat does not win either.
>
> Nader's candidacy is a good thing for Republicans.
That's the only reason bush ever got "elected" in the first place
So you guys had to count on trickery
Meanwhile, oh brave bush supporter Jeffy baby, why isn't your cowardly
chickenshit chickenhawk a.s in Iraq fighting for the man you believe
in so
|
| Jeff Strickland | 25 Feb 2008 00:05 |
I do not pretend that he can win, but Nader himself acknowledges that every
vote he gets is a vote that the Democrat candidate will not get. There's no
chance Nader can win, and there's a very good chance he can make it so the
Democrat does not win either.
Nader's candidacy is a good thing for Republicans.
> No. It won't
> I worked for his campaign in the past.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> Surely
>> you know that ... |
| robw | 24 Feb 2008 23:50 |
No. It won't
I worked for his campaign in the past.
He can't win.
What's that Who song?
> Nader himself acknowledges his campaign will siphon Democrat votes. Surely
> you know that ... |
| Jeff Strickland | 24 Feb 2008 23:31 |
Nader himself acknowledges his campaign will siphon Democrat votes. Surely
you know that ...
|
| robw | 24 Feb 2008 23:25 |
The Nadar run will mean nothing.
And I've worked for his campaign in the past.
You know that Bush Derangement thing?
Guess what?
> Some of the best news for McCain has happened this week. The New York Times
> totally screwed up in their liberal rhetoric and then Nader announced he
> would run.
>
> Democrats should convince Paul to run on a 3rd party ticket. |
| Don't Taze Me, Bro! | 24 Feb 2008 22:44 |
Some of the best news for McCain has happened this week. The New York Times
totally screwed up in their liberal rhetoric and then Nader announced he
would run.
Democrats should convince Paul to run on a 3rd party ticket.
|
Quick links:
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage